Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 12:2 (2021) ► pp.224–242

Efficiency in shaping grammars

The case of multiple occurrences of the Chinese reflexive ziji

 | Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics
 | Zhejiang University
Hawkins (1994, 1999, 2004, 2014a) proposes a performance-grammar correspondence hypothesis, claiming that grammars can be shaped by processing systems with reference to the degree of preference in communication. Given that Hawkins’s proposal mainly highlights the role of efficiency in language comprehension, this paper demonstrates that parsing principles can also be employed to account for language production. Based on an analysis of the production mechanism behind multiple occurrences of the Chinese reflexive ziji ‘self’ in a single clause, it shows that the notion of intersubjectivity can sometimes play a significant role in sentence planning, in the sense that the Chinese reflexive assists speakers to produce an utterance in line with the principle of efficiency, which will in turn help hearers compute the intended meaning by identifying potential referents.
Keywords: language production, performance-grammar correspondence hypothesis, Chinese reflexive, intersubjectivity, efficiency principle
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The performance-grammar correspondence hypothesis
  • 3.Principles of language production
  • 4.A production-based account
    • 4.1A production account of multiple zijis
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 3 June 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.17031.yan
References (46)
References
Arnold, Jennifer, Janet Eisenband, Sarah Brown-Schmidt and John Trueswell. 2000. “The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking”. Cognition 761: B13–B26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Shipar Dingare and Christopher D. Manning. 2001. “Soft constraints mirror hard constraints: voice and person in English and Lummi”. In Proceedings of the LFG 01 Conference, ed. by M. Butt and T. H. King, 13–32. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry. 2004. Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breban, Tine. 2010. English Adjectives of Comparison: Lexical and Grammaticalized Uses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah and Michael Tanenhaus. 2008. “Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: A targeted language game approach”. Cognitive Science 321: 643–684. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan and Paul Hopper (Eds.). 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Peter John. 1976. Kunwinjku (Gunwinggu): A language of Western Arnhem Land. Canberra: Australian National University master’s thesis.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Corbett, Albert and Frederick Chang. 1983. Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedents. Memory & Cognition 111: 283–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Pinedo-Garcia, Manuel and Jason Nobel. 2008. “Beyond persons: extending the personal/subpersonal distinction to non-rational animals and artificial agents”. Biology and Philosophy 231: 87–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 1986. Content and Consciousness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1985. “Competing motivations”. In Iconicity in Syntax, ed. by J. Haiman, 343–365. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Victor and Robert Slevc. 2007. “Grammatical encoding”. In The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, ed. by Gareth Gaskell, 453–470. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Filimonova, Elena. 1999. Universal’nye anomalii lichnyx mestoimenij [Universal Anomalies of Personal Pronouns]. Doctoral dissertation, Moscow State University.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Person hierarchy and its implications: The case of Aymara”. In Current Studies on South American Languages [ Indigenous Languages of Latin America, 3], ed. by M. Crevels, S. van de Kerke, S. Meira & H. van der Voort, Leiden: Research School of Asian, African, and American Studies (CNWS) 199–213.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1975. Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet D. 1978. “Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations”. Linguistic Inquiry 91: 427–473.Google Scholar
Gabelentz, Georg von der. 1901. Die Sprachwissenschaft, ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Leipzig: C. H. Tauchnitz.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1966. Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. “Explaining article-possessor complementarity: Economic motivation in noun phrase syntax”. Language 751: 227–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1994. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1999. “Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars”. Language 751: 244–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014a. Crosslinguistic Variation and Efficiency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b. “Patterns in competing motivations and the interaction of principles”. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ed. by B. MacWhinney, A. Malchukov and E. Moravcsik, 54–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, Audrey Y-H. Li and Yafei Li. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward and Bernard Comrie. 1977. “Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar”. Linguistic Inquiry 81: 63–99.Google Scholar
Kirby, Simon. 1999. Function, selection and innateness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koyama, Wataru. 2009. “Indexically anchored onto the deictic center of discourse: Grammar, sociocultural interaction, and ‘emancipatory pragmatics’”. Journal of Pragmatics 411: 79–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, Willem J. M. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, Xiaoqian and Xiaolin Zhou. 2010. “Who is ziji? ERP responses to the Chinese reflexive pronoun during sentence comprehension”. Brain Research 13311: 96–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian, Andrej Malchukov and Edith Moravcsik (Eds.). 2014. Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. 2014. “Introduction”. In Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage, ed. by B. MacWhinney, A. Malchukov and E. Moravcsik, 1–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, Dana, Cecile Mckee, Wayne Cowart and Merrill Garret. 2015. “The role of the language production system in shaping grammars”. Language 911: 415–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitkov, Ruslan. 2002. Anaphora Resolution. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Pan, Haihua. 1997. Constraints on Reflexivization in Mandarin Chinese. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl and Ivan A. Sag. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl and Ping Xue. 1998. “Chinese reflexive ziji: syntactic reflexives vs. nonsyntactic reflexives”. Jounal of East Asian Linguistics 71: 287–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shuai, Lan, Tao Gong and Yicheng Wu. 2013. “Who is who? Interpretation of multiple occurrences of the Chinese reflexives: evidence from real-time sentence processing”. PLOS ONE 8(9): e73226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, Michael, Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton, Kathleen M. Eberhand and Julie C. Sedivy. 1995. “Intergration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension”. Science 2681: 1632–1634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tosco, Mauro. 2010. Why contrast matters: Information structure in Gawwada (East Cushitic). In The Expression of Information Structure, ed. by I. Fiedler and A. Schwarz, 315–348. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Wal, Jenneke. 2015. “Information structure, (inter)subjectivity and objectification”. Journal of Linguistics 511: 425–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of Intersubjectivity: Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Intersubjectivity and the architecture of the language system”. In The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectity, ed. by J. Zlatev, T. P. Timothy, C. Sinha and E. Itkonen, 307–331. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xue, Ping, Carl Pollard and Ivan A. Sag. 1994. “A new perspective on Chinese reflexive ziji ”. In Proceedings of the 13th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 432–477. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Yang, Xiaolong and Yicheng Wu. 2015. “Whether or not multiple occurrences of ziji can take distinct antecedents: A deictic perspective”. Journal of Pragmatics 871: 142–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar