Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 14:6 (2023) ► pp.908943
Aksan, Mustafa, and Yeşim Aksan
2018 “Linguistic Corpora: A View from Turkish.” In Studies in Turkish Natural Language Processing, ed. by Kemal Oflazer and Murat Saraçlar, 291–315. Berlin: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altıparmak, Ayşe
2022 “An analysis of Turkish interactional discourse markers ‘şey’, ‘yani’, and ‘işte’.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 51(4): 729–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Elaine S., Maquela Brizuela, Beatrice DuPuy, and Laura Gonnerman
1999 “Cross-linguistic evidence for the early acquisition of discourse markers as register variables.” Journal of Pragmatics 311: 1339–1351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla
1990 “Phatic connectives as interactional cues in contemporary spoken Italian.” Journal of Pragmatics 141: 629–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate
2007 “La co-variation des marqueurs discursifs bon, c’est-à-dire, enfin, hein, quand même, quoi, et si vous voulez : Une question d’identité?” [The co-variation of the discursive markers bon, c’est-a-dire, enfin, hein, quand meme, quoi, and si vous voulez: A question of identity?] Langue Française 2(154): 78–93.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996Pragmatic Markers in English. Berlin and New York: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1978 “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, ed. by Esther N. Goody, 56–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1987 “Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow.” In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. by Russell S. Tomlin, 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dailey-O’Cain, Jennifer
2000 “The sociolinguistic distribution of and attitudes toward focuser like and quotative like .” Journal of Sociolinguistics 41: 60–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolino
1993 “Outline of Discourse Transcription.” In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. by Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert, 45–89. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet
1999 “New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research.” Language in Society 281: 185–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, Britt
1986 “Some Pragmatic Expressions in English Conversation.” In English in Speech and Writing: A Symposium, ed. by Gunnel Tottie and Ingegerd Bäklund, 131–147. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
1992 “Female and male usage of pragmatic expressions in same-sex and mixedsex interaction.” Language Variation and Change 41: 217–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foolen, Ad
1996 “Pragmatic Particles.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 1–24. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
2005Guidelines for Research in Discourse Markers. Boston: Boston University.Google Scholar
Furman, Reyhan, and Aslı Özyürek
2007 “Development of interactional discourse markers: Insights from Turkish children’s and adults’ oral narratives.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 1742–1757. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabarró-Lopez, Silvia
2020 “Are discourse markers related to age and educational background? A comparative account between two sign languages.” Journal of Pragmatics 1561: 68–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1955 “On face-work.” Psychiatry 18(3): 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1970 “Language Structure and Language Functions.” In New Horizons in Linguistics, ed. by John Lyons, 140–165. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
1977Explorations in the Functions of Language. New York: Elsevier North-Holland.Google Scholar
1978Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1979 “Modes of Meaning and Modes of Expression: Types of Grammatical Structure, and their Determination by Different Semantic Functions.” In Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis: Essays Offered to William Haas, ed. D. J. Allerton, Edward Carney, and David Holdcroft, 57–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet
1986 “Functions of you know in women’s and men’s speech.” Language in Society 151: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, Allan Bell, and Mary Teresa Boyce
1991Variation and Change in New Zealand English: A Social Dialect Investigation. (Project Report to the Social Sciences Committee of the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology). Wellington: Victoria University.Google Scholar
Ilgın, Leyla, and Nalan Büyükkantarcıoğlu
1994 “Türkçe’de “Yani” Sözcüğünün Kullanımı Üzerine Bir İnceleme.” [A Study on the Use of the Word “Yani” in Turkish]. In Proceedings of the 8th Turkish Linguistics Conference, 24–37. Istanbul: Istanbul University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levelt, Willem J. M.
1983 “Monitoring and self-repair in speech.” Cognition 141: 41–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald
2002 “You know, it depends.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 749–767. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matei, Mădălina
2011 “The influence of age and gender on the selection of discourse markers in casual conversations.” Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov Series IV: Philology and Cultural Studies 4 (53) No.1: 213–220.Google Scholar
Müller, Simone
2005Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native English Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola
1981You Know: A Discourse-Functional Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özbek, Nurdan
1995Discourse Markers in Turkish and English: A Comparative Study. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Nottingham: Nottingham University.
2000 “Yani, İşte, Şey, Ya: Interactional Markers of Turkish.” In Studies on Turkish and Turkic Languages, ed. by Aslı Göksel and Celia Kerslake, 393–401. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Perera, Kaushalya
2021 “Interviewing academic elites: A discourse analysis of shifting power relations.” Qualitative Research 21(2): 215–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Povolná, Renata
2008 “Why are there so many labels for discourse markers?Discourse and Interaction 1/11: 115–124.Google Scholar
Ruhi, Şükriye
2009 “The Pragmatics of Yani as a Parenthetical Marker in Turkish: Evidence from the METU Turkish Corpus.” In Working Papers in Corpus-Based Linguistics and Language Education 31: 285–298.Google Scholar
2013 “Interactional markers in Turkish: A corpus-based perspective.” Journal of Linguistics and Literature 10(2): 1–7.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleef, Erik
2004 “Gender, power, discipline, and context: On the sociolinguistic variation of okay, right, like, and you know in English academic discourse.” Texas Linguistic Forum 481: 177–186.Google Scholar
Schwalbe, Michael L., and Michelle Wolkomir
2002 “Interviewing Men.” In Handbook of Interview Research, ed. by Jaber F. Gubrium and James A. Holstein, 203–19. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Stubbe, Maria, and Janet Holmes
1995 “You know, eh and other ‘exasperating expressions’: an analysis of social and stylistic variation in the use of pragmatic devices in a sample of New Zealand English.” Language & Communication 15(1): 63–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenger-Trayner, Etienne, and Beverly Wenger-Trayner
2015An Introduction to Communities of Practice: A Brief Overview of the Concept and Its Uses. Available from authors at [URL]
Yılmaz, Erkan
1994Descriptive and Comparative Study of the Discourse Markers ‘Well’ in English and ‘Şey’ in Turkish (Unpublished Master’s Thesis), Colchester: Essex University.Google Scholar
2004A Pragmatic Analysis of Turkish Discourse Particles: Yani, İşte and Şey. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.