Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 14:4 (2023) ► pp.568592
References (75)
Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel. A.
2019Constructing us. The First and Second Persons in Spanish Media Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel and María José Serrano
2013Style in Syntax. Investigating Variation in Spanish Pronoun System. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2016 “A Matter of Style: Gender and Subject Variation in Spanish”. Gender and Language 10 (2): 240–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan
2014The Guidebook to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bodine, Ann
1975 “Sex Differentiation in Language”. In Language and Sex: Difference and dominance, ed. by Barrie Thorne and Nancy Henley, 130–151. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Boogart, Ronny and Egbert Fortuin
2016 “Modality and Mood in Cognitive Linguistics and Construction Grammars”. In The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood, ed. by Jan Nuyts and Johan van Auwera, 514–534. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Bravo, Ana and Luis García Fernández
2016 “Perífrasis Verbales”. In Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica, ed. by Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach, 785–796. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broccias, Cristiano
2016 “Cognitive Approaches to Grammar”. In Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, ed. by Gitte Kristiansen, Francisco Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Michel Achard and René Dirven, 81–115. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan and Suzanne Fleischman
1995 “Modality in Grammar and Discourse: an Introductory Essay”. In Modality in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by Joan Bybee and Suzanne Fleischman, 1–14. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah
1985Feminist and Linguistic Theory. London: McMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, Jennifer
1986Women, Men and Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cook-Gumperz, Jenny
2001 “Girls’ Oppositional Stances: The Interactional Accomplishment of Gender in Nursery School and Family Life”. In Gender in Interaction, ed. by Bettina Baron and Helga Kotthoff, 21–50. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William and Allan D. Cruse
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuyckens, Hubert, Kristin Davidse and Lieven Vandelanotte
2010 “Introduction”. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Hubert Cuyckens, Kristin Davidse and Lieven Vandelanotte, 1–26. Mouton: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie
2015Linguistic Variation, Identity Construction and Cognition. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
1993 “Cooperative Competition in Adolescent Girl Talk”. In Gender and Conversational Interaction, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 32–61. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
2000Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. The Linguistic Construction of Social Meaning in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet
2003Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, Benjamin Bergen and Jörg Zinken
2007 “The Cognitive Linguistic Enterprise: an Overview”. In The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, ed. by Vyvyan Evans, Benjamin Bergen and Jörg Zinken, 2–36. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony
2009Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gili Gaya, Samuel
1980Curso Superior de Sintaxis Española. Barcelona: Biblograf.Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel
2001 “Theorizing Gender: Feminist Awareness and Language Change”. In Gender in Interaction, ed. by Bettina Baron and Helga Kotthoff, 329–347. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez Torrego, Leonardo
1988Perífrasis verbales: sintaxis, semántica y estilística. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
1992La impersonalidad gramatical: descripción y norma. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Goutier, N.
2009 “The Origin of Social Approach in Language and Cognition Research Exemplified by Studies into the Origins of Language”. In Language and Social Cognition: Expression of the Social Mind, ed. by Hanna Pishwa, 25–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C.
2003 “Gender and Power in Online Communication”. In The Handbook of Language and Gender ed. by Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff, 202–223. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C. and Sharon Stoerger
2014 “Gender and (A)nonymity in Computer-Mediated Communication”. In The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality, ed. by Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff and Janet Holmes, 567–586. Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
2009 “Men, Masculinities and Leadership: Different Discourse Styles at Work”. In Gender and Spoken Interaction, ed. by Pia Pichler and Eva Eppler, 186–210. London: Palgrave McMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Language and Gender in the Workplace”. In The Handbook of Language, Gender and Sexuality ed. by Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff and Janet Holmes, 433–452. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
James, Deborah
1996Derogatory Terms for Men and Women: A New Look. Paper Presented at Gender and Belief Systems: Fourth Women and Language Conference . Berkeley: California.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1990 “The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change”. Language Variation and Change 2(2), 205–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1990 “The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemas?Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1): 39–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1973Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1985 “Observations and Speculations on Subjectivity”. In Iconicity in Syntax, ed. by John Haiman, 109–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999a “Assessing the Cognitive Linguistic Enterprise”. In Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope and Methodology, ed. by Theo Janssen and Gisela Redeker, 15–39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999bGrammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “An Introduction to Cognitive Grammar”. In The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, ed. by Vyvyan Evans, Benjamin Bergen and Jörg Zinken, 444–480. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Leon, Felipe
2017 “From Modal Skepticism to Modal Empiricism”. In Modal Epistemology after Rationalism, ed. by Bob Fischer and Felipe Leon, 247–262. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maltz, Daniel N. and Bolker, Ruth A.
1982 “A Cultural Approach to Male-Female Miscommunication”. In Language and social identity, ed. by John. J. Gumperz, 196–216. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCormick, K. M.
2001 “Gender and Language”. In Concise Encyclopedia of Sociolinguistics, ed. by Rajend Mesthrie and R. E. Asher, 336–345. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, M.
2014 “Variation and Gender”. In The Handbook of Language, Gender and Sexuality, ed. by Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff and Janet Holmes, 87–102. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mills, Sara
2012Gender Matters. Feminist Linguistic Analysis. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Mittelberg, Irene, Thomas A. Farmer and Linda R. Waugh
2007 “They Actually Said That? An Introduction to Working with Usage Data through Discourse and Corpus Analysis”. In Methods in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Mónica González-Márquez, Irene Mittelberg, Seana Coulson and Michael J. Spivey, 19–52. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
NGLE
2010Real Academia Española y Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. Nueva gramática de la lengua española, Madrid, Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2007 “Cognitive Linguistics and Functional Linguistics”. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens, 543–566. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
2016 “Analyses of the Modal Meanings”. In The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood, ed. by Jan Nuyts and Johan van der Auwera, 31–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, John
2007Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perkins, Michael R.
1983Modal Expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Pishwa, Hanna
2009 “Linguistic Structures as Cues for Social Cognitive Functions: Introduction.” In Language and Social Cognition: Expression of the Social Mind, ed. by Hanna Pishwa, 1–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul
2009Modality. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Ramson, Evelyn N.
1977 “On the Representation of Modality”. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 357–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española y Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española
2005Diccionario Panhispánico de Dudas. Madrid: Santillana.Google Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad
2009 “On Collective Cognition and Language”. In Language and Social Cognition: Expression of the Social Mind, ed. by Hanna Pishwa, 163–180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serrano, María José
2011 “Morphosyntactic Variation in Spain”. In Handbook of Hispanic Sociolinguistics, ed. by Manuel Díaz-Campos, 187–204. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “La variación sintáctica”. In Enciclopedia de Lingüística Hispánica, ed. by Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach, 809–821. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “La textualización de la desubjetivización: variación entre la perífrasis haber que + infinitivo y el clítico se”. Oralia 23 (1): 131–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021 “La modalidad deóntica como (de)subjetivación del discurso: variación entre las perífrasis haber/tener que+infinitivo», Anuario de Letras. Lingüística y Filología ” IX (2): 43–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serrano, María José and Miguel Ángel Aijón Oliva
2011 “Syntactic Variation and Communicative Style”. Language Sciences 331: 138–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2004Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sunderland, Jane
2004Gendered Discourses. New York: Palgrave McMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Language and Gender. An Advance Resource Book. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sally
2012Variationist Sociolinguistics. Change, Observation, Interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Talbot, Mary
2010Language and Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
2007 “The Relation of Grammar to Cognition”. In The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, ed. by Vyvyan Evans, Bettina Bergen and Jörg Zinken, 481–544. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1986That’s not what I meant! How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks your Relation with Others. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
1991You Just Don’t Understand. London: Virago.Google Scholar
1993 “The Relativity of Linguistic Strategies. Rethinking Power and Solidarity in Gender and Dominance”. In Gender and Conversational Interaction, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 165–185. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1997 “Yes: Women and Men Talking: an Interactional Sociolinguistic Approach”. In Women, Men and Gender: Ongoing Debates, ed. by Mary Roth Walsh, 82–90. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Andrea
2008 “Introduction”. In Language in the Context of Use: Discourse and Cognitive Approaches to Language, ed. by Andrea Tyler, Kim Young and Mari Takada, 1–22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich and Hans-Jörg Schmid
1996An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Van Herk, Gerard
2012What is Sociolinguistics? Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weatherall, Ann
2000Gender Relevance in Talk-in-Interaction in Discourse. Discourse and Society 111: 290–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele
2012Discourse of Twitter and Social Media. London: Continuum Publishing group.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by 2 other publications

Aijón Oliva, Miguel Ángel
2023. Opciones múltiples, significados diferentes: las construcciones modales deónticas en el dis-curso oral y escrito de los medios de comunicación peninsulares. Dicenda. Estudios de lengua y literatura españolas 41  pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Serrano, María José
2023. Sintaxis y discurso: el infinitivo independiente en los tuits como variante y punto de vista desubjetivador . Moenia DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.