Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 14:6 (2023) ► pp.824843
References (38)
References
Ädel, Annelie. 2006. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “Reflections on Reflexivity in Digital Communication: Towards a Third Wave of Metadiscourse Studies.” In Metadiscourse in Digital Communication, ed. by Larissa D’Angelo, Anna Mauranen and Stefania Maci, 37–65. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amouzadeh, Mohammad and Raha Zareifard. 2019. “Interactional metadiscourse of gender in Persian: The case of conference presentations.” Pragmatics and Society 10 (4): 512–537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2006. “Introduction: sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 10 (4): 419–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barber, Charles, Joan Beal and Phillip Shaw. 2009. The English Language: A Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, Judith. 2010. The Language of Female Leadership. New York: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper. 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Brescoll, Victoria. 2016. “Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes of emotion lead to biased evaluations of female leaders.” The Leadership Quarterly 271: 415–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall. 2010. “Locating Language in Identity.” In Language and Identities, ed. by Carmen Llamas and Dominic Watt, 18–28. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 1995. Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2007. The Myth of Mars and Venus: Do Men and Women Really Speak Different Languages? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Curl, Traci, and Paul Drew. 2008. Contingency and action: a comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2): 129–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freytag, Vera. 2020. Exploring Politeness in Business Emails: A Mixed Methods Analysis. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ho, Victor. 2014. “Managing rapport through grounder in evaluation – A qualitative study.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (10): 2534–2547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Exploring metadiscourse in making persuasive attempts through workplace email requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 1131: 70–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 2006. Gendered Talk at Work: Constructing Gender Identity through Workplace Discourse. New York and Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet. and Maria Stubbe. 2003. Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Jensen, Astrid. 2009. “Discourse Strategies in Professional E-mail Negotiation: A Case Study”. English for Specific Purposes 281: 4–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Feng. Kevin, and Ken, Hyland. 2021. “‘The goal of this analysis…’: Changing patterns of metadiscursive nouns in disciplinary writing.” Lingua 2521: 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2010. “Locating Language in Identity.” In Language and Identities, ed. by Carmen Llamas and Dominic Watt, 29–38. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Deborah. 2000. “‘Gender trouble in the Workplace: ‘Language and Gender’ Meets ‘Feminist Organizational Communication’”. In Gendered Speech in Social Context: Perspectives from Gown & Town, ed. by Janet Holmes, 192–210. Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel, and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koester, Almut. 2010. Workplace Discourse. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ladegaard, Hans Jørgen. 2012. “Rudeness as a discursive strategy.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1661–1679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 2021. “‘Gonna write about it on my blog too’. Metadiscourse in Research Blog Discussions.” In Metadiscourse in Digital Communication, ed. by Larissa D’Angelo, Anna. Mauranen, and Stefania Maci, 11–35. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKeown, Jamie. 2022. A comparative investigation of metadiscursive clarifying devices in the abortion discourse of the U.S. Supreme Court. Discourse & Communication, accessed here: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKeown, Jamie and Qilin Zhang. 2015. “Socio-pragmatic variation on opening salutation and closing valediction of British Workplace Email.” Journal of Pragmatics 851: 92–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKeown, Jamie, and Hans Jørgen Ladegaard. 2020. “Exploring the metadiscursive realisation of incivility in TV news discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media 331, 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob. 1993. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mullany, Louise. 2010. “Gendered Identities in the Professional Workplace.” In Language and Identities, ed. by Carmen Llamas and Dominic Watt, 179–190. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ng, Catherine, and Laura Byra. 2006. “Communication Channels and Gender Structures at Work”. In Gender and Communication at Work, ed. by Mary Barret and Marilyn. J. Davidson, 129–141. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Nieva, Veronica, and Barbara Gutek. 1980. “Sex Effects on Evaluation.” Academy of Management Review 5(2): 267–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1992. “Indexing gender.” In Sex and Gender Hierarchies, ed. By Barbara Miller, 146–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa. 2009. “Metapragmatic utterances in computer-mediated communication”. In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz and Axel Huber, 87–106. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tse, Polly, and Ken Hyland. 2008. “Robot Kung fu: Gender and professional identity in biology and philosophy reviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 401: 1232–1248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, Julia T. 2014. Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender, and Culture. Boston: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.Google Scholar