Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 15:4 (2024) ► pp.501–531

Historical imprints on Chinese ideological given names

 | Beihang University
 | University of Western Australia
 | Curtin University
This diachronic study investigates Chinese ideological given names (personal names which represent the name-givers’ shared ideas and beliefs) by focusing on historical changes over five time periods between 1935 and 2012. Based on an analysis of 21,687 given names, 2,687 (12.4%) of which are ideological names, the study finds that naming practices bear historical imprints in terms of content and syllabic form. The more intensely a society is politicized, the higher the rate of occurrence of ideological given names. The data also illustrate the dynamic that exists in naming practices between conformity and individuality. In this article, we argue that names are like social cards: people play them to serve their ideological needs, as shown by the evolution of naming strategies through different historical periods. The implication is that historical changes can influence the way in which a name can communicate ideological views.
Keywords: given names, personal names, first names, Chinese names, ideological names, socio-onomastics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Chinese names
    • 2.1Given names in the Chinese personal naming system
    • 2.2Ideological given names
  • 3.Data and methodology
    • 3.1Research design
    • 3.2Data analysis
  • 4.Changes in the content, quantity, and form of ideological names
    • 4.1Changes in the content and quantity of ideological names
      • 4.1.1Period 1: The Republic of China (1935–1948)
      • 4.1.2Period 2: Socialist transformation (1949–1965)
      • 4.1.3Period 3: The Cultural Revolution (1966–1976)
      • 4.1.4Period 4: Economic Reform (1977–1984)
      • 4.1.5Period 5: Economic Growth (2010–2012)
    • 4.2Form changes in ideological names
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Historical imprints on Chinese ideological names
    • 5.2Conformity
    • 5.3Individualism
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 13 April 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21008.su
References (37)
References
Ainiala, Terhi. 2016. “Attitudes to Street Names in Helsinki.” In Names and Naming: People, Places, Perceptions and Power, ed. by Guy Puzey, and Laura Kostanski, 106–119. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ainiala, Terhi, and Jan-Ola Östman. 2017. “Introduction: Socio-onomastics and Pragmatics.” In Socio-Onomastics: The Pragmatics of Names, ed. by Terhi Ainiala, and Jan-Ola Östman, 2–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aldrin, Emilia. 2017. “Creating Identities through the Choice of First Names.” In Socio-Onomastics: The Pragmatics of Names, ed. by Terhi Ainiala, and Jan-Ola Östman, 46–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aleksiejuk, Katarzyna. 2016. “Internet Personal Naming Practices and Trends in Scholarly Approaches”. In Names and Naming: People, Places, Perceptions and Power, ed. by Guy Puzey, and Laura Kostanski, 3–17. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alhaug, Gulbrand, and Minna Saarelma. 2017. “Naming of Children in Finnish and Finnish-Norwegian Families in Norway”. In Socio-Onomastics: The Pragmatics of Names, ed. by Terhi Ainiala, and Jan-Ola Östman, 70–91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheang, Justina. 2008. “Choice of Foreign Names as a Strategy for Identity Management.” Intercultural Communication Studies 17(2): 197–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Bronwyn, and Rom Harré. 2001. “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” In Discourse Theory and Practice, ed. by Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon Yates, 261–271. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 2003. “Language as Culture in U.S. Anthropology: Three Paradigms.” Current Anthropology 44(3): 323–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chinese Dictionary Compilation Division (汉语大字典编纂处). 2018. Chinese Comprehensive Dictionary (中华大词典). Chengdu: Sichuan Dictionary Press (四川辞书出版社). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Edward, Paul G. Pickowicz, and Mark Selden. 2005. Revolution, Resistance, and Reform in Village China. New Haven: Yale University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodenough, Ward H. 1965. “Personal Names and Modes of Address in Two Oceanic Societies.” In Context and Meaning in Cultural Anthropology, ed. by Melford E. Spiro, 265–276. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habibi, Nader. 1992. “Popularity of Islamic and Persian Names in Iran Before and After the Islamic Revolution.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 241: 253–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henry, Eric S. 2012. “When Dragon Met Jasmine: Domesticating English Names in Chinese Social Interaction.” Anthropologica 54(1): 107–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herbert, Robert K. 1998. “Personal Naming and Social Organization: The Comparative Anthroponymy of Southern Africa.” In Scope, Perspectives and Methods of Onomastics, ed. by Wilhelm F. H. Nicolaisen, 187–194. Aberdeen: Department of English, University of Aberdeen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, Geert. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. New York: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leibring, Katharina. 2016. “Given Names in European Naming Systems.” In The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming, ed. by Carole Hough, 199–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberson, Stanley. 2000. A Matter of Taste: How Names, Fashions, and Culture Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberson, Stanley, and Eleanor O. Bell. 1992. “Children’s First Names: An Empirical Study of Social Taste.” American Journal of Sociology 98(3): 511–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieberson, Stanley, and Freda B. Lynn. 2003. “Popularity as a Taste: An Application to the Naming Process.” Onoma 381: 235–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, Jo, and Deborah Dempsey. 2017. “First Names and Social Distinction: Middle-class Naming Practices in Australia.” Journal of Sociology 53(3): 577–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lou, Guangqin. 1985. “Looking at Social Culture from Names.” Foreign Language Teaching and Research 51: 79–82.Google Scholar
Mao, Robert L. M. 1994. “Beyond Politeness Theory: ‘Face’ Revisited and Renewed.” Journal of Pragmatics 21(5): 451–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Men, Zaofen. 2010. “A Cross-cultural Comparative Study of Chinese and English Names.” Journal of Chifeng University 11: 33–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obukhova, Elena, Ezra W. Zuckerman, and Jiayin Zhang. 2014. “When Politics Froze Fashion: The Effect of the Cultural Revolution on Naming in Beijing.” American Journal of Sociology 120(2): 555–583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rymes, Betsy. 1996. “Naming as Social Practice: The Case of Little Creeper from Diamond Street.” Language in Society 251: 237–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scollon, Ron, and Suzanne Wong Scollon. 1995. Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sung, Margaret M. Y. 1981. “Chinese Personal Naming.” Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 161: 67–90.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1995. “Discourse Semantics and Ideology.” Discourse and Society 6(2): 243–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. “Discourse and Manipulation.” Discourse and Society 17(3): 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Langendonck, Willy. 2007. Theory and Typology of Proper Names. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varnum, Michael E. W., and Kitayama Shinobu. 2011. “What’s in a Name? Popular Names are Less Common on Frontiers. Psychological Science 221: 176–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walkowiak, Justyna B. 2016. “Personal Names in Language Policy and Planning: Who Plans What Names, for Whom and How?” In Names and Naming: People, Places, Perceptions and Power, ed. by Guy Puzey, and Laura Kostanski, 197–212. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weitman, Sasha. 1987. “Prénoms et Orientations Nationales en Israël 1882–1980.” Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales 421: 879–900. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, Rongmei. 2019. “An Intercultural Comparative Study on Names of Chinese and English.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 9(10): 1332–1336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar