Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 15:2 (2024) ► pp.246274
References (47)
Amossy, Ruth
2009 “The New Rhetoric’s inheritance: Argumentation and discourse analysis.” Argumentation 231: 313–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Alison, Stuart Allan, Alan Petersen and Clare Wilkinson
2005 “The framing of nanotechnologies in the British newspaper press.” Science Communication 27 (2): 200–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Augoustinos, Martha, Shona Crabb and Richard Shepherd
2010 “Genetically modified food in the news: Media representations of the GM debate in the UK.” Public Understanding of Science 19 (1): 98–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika and Changpeng Huan
2018 “Key principles for analyzing appraisal.” Foreign Languages Research, 11: 39–45.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth
1969A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Martha S.
2008 “Ethos and narrative in online educational chat.” In Rhetoric in Detail: Discourse Analyses of Rhetorical Talk and Text, ed. by Barbara Johnstone and Chris Eisenhart, 195–226. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Guy, Elisa Pieri and Peter T. Robbins
2004 “The scientists think and the public feels: Expert perceptions of the discourse of GM food.” Discourse & Society 15 (4): 433–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Guy, Peter T. Robbins and Elisa Pieri
2006 “Words of mass destruction: British newspaper coverage of the genetically modified food debate, expert and non-expert reactions.” Public Understanding of Science 151: 3–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowhurst, Marion
1990 “Teaching and learning the writing of persuasive/argumentative discourse.” Canadian Journal of Education 151: 348–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1978Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., and Christian M. Matthiessen
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halmari, Helena and Tuija Virtanen
2005Persuasion Across Genres: A Linguistic Approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Alison, C. Kay Weaver and George Cheney
2007 “Talking ‘facts’: Identity and rationality in industry perspectives on genetic modification.” Discourse Studies 9 (1): 9–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Colin and Robyn Walker
2012 “Ethos, logos, pathos: Strategies of persuasion in social/environmental reports.” Accounting Forum 361: 194–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmgreen, Lise-Lotte and Torben Vestergaard
2009 “Evaluation and audience acceptance in biotech news texts”. Journal of Pragmatics 411: 586–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, Sally
2010 “Enacting rhetoric in the civic domain.” English in Australia 45 (3): 9–20.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2000Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2005 “Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse.” Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Richard
2000 “Categorization: Identity, social process and epistemology.” Current Sociology 48 (3): 7–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, George A.
2007Aristotle on Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse (George A. Kennedy, translator). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S.
1962The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lassen, Inger
2006 “Is the press release a genre? A study of form and content.” Discourse Studies 8 (4): 503–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008a “Construing hope in gene modification discourse.” In Towards Humane Technologies: Biotechnologies, New Media and Ethics, ed. by Naomi Sunderland, Phil Graham, Peter Isaacs and Bernard McKenna, 133–150. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b “Commonplaces and social uncertainty: Negotiating public opinion.” Journal of Risk Research 11 (8): 1025–1045. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lukin, Annabelle
2019War and Its Ideologies: A Social-semiotic Theory and Description. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maeseele, Pieter
2015 “Risk conflicts, critical discourse analysis and media discourses on GM crops and food.” Journalism 16 (2): 278–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Jeanette R.
2000 “Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Jeanette R. and Peter R. White
2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R. and Ashley R. Kelly
eds. 2017Emerging Genres in New Media Environments. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Motion, Judy and C. Kay Weaver
2005 “The epistemic struggle for credibility: Rethinking media relations.” Journal of Communication Management 9 (13): 246–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Elwood
1944 “The semantics of rhetoric: A dialogue on public speaking in 1944.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 30 (1): 31–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen
2012Scientific Discourse and the Rhetoric of Globalization: The Impact of Culture and Language. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Phillips, Louise, Anabela Carvalho and Julie Doyle
eds. 2012Citizen Voices. Performing Public Participation in Science and Environment Communication. Chicago: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
Pinho, Fabiana
2018On logos, pathos and ethos in judicial argumentation. In Aristotle on Emotions in Law and Politics, ed. by Liesbeth Huppes-Cluysenaer and Nuno M. M. S. Coelho, 133–155. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poortinga, P. Wouter and Nick F. Pidgeon
2005 “Trust in risk regulation”. Risk Analysis 251: 199–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Priest, Susanna H.
2006 “The public opinion climate for gene technologies in Canada and the United States: Competing voices, contrasting frames.” Public Understanding of Science 151: 55–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Priest, Susanna H. and Ten Eyck, Toby A.
2003 “News coverage of biotechnology debates.” Society. 40 (6): 29–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers-Hayden, Tee and Nicholas F. Pidgeon
2007 “Moving engagement ‘upstream’? Nanotechnologies and the royal society and royal academy of engineering’s inquiry.” Public Understanding of Science 161: 345–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roper, Juliet, Ted Zorn and C. Kay Weaver
2004Science Dialogues: The Communicative Properties of Science and Technology Dialogue. Hamilton, N. Z.: University of Waikato.Google Scholar
Schwarze, Steve
2006 “Environmental melodrama.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 92 (3): 239–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Mark C.
1995 “Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches.” The Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571–610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ten Eyck, Toby A.
2005 “The media and public opinion on genetics and biotechnology: Mirrors,windows or walls?Public Understanding of Science 141: 305–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
To, Vinh, Damon Thomas and Angela Thomas
2020 “Writing persuasive texts: Using grammatical metaphors for rhetorical purposes in an educational context.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 40 (2): 139–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tourangeau, Wesley
2018 “Power, discourse, and news media: Examining Canada’s GM Alfalfa protests.” Geoforum 911: 117–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Peter R.
2001Appraisal Website. [URL]
Yamaguchi, Tomiko
2007 “Controversy over genetically modified crops in India: Discursive strategies and social identities of farmers.” Discourse Studies 9 (1): 87–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar