Cover not available
Article published In:
Dialogicity in Political Discourse
Edited by Elda Weizman and Zohar Livnat
[Pragmatics and Society 13:5] 2022
► pp. 861–884

Resemblance in comments/posts interaction

Forms and functions of dialogicity

| Bar-Ilan University
| David Yellin College of Education
This paper studies dialogicity in posts and their comments. Focusing on political slogans in the Facebook page of Israel PM Binyamin Netanyahu, we examine the ways comments meta-represent the posts in various degrees of resemblance. Starting with the premise that comments/post interactions are dialogic in the Bakhtinian sense, we argue that comments are dialogic in yet another way, which is related to the form and degree of resemblance between them. The conceptualization draws on the notion of meta-representation supplemented by insights gained from accommodation theory and Bakhtin’s dialogism. We argue that through resemblance, the propositional content, ideology and viewpoint conveyed by the initiating slogan are incorporated in the comment, and a tacit dialogue is constructed between them. An additional layer of polyphony is added to the multiplicity of ratified voices otherwise manifest in the interaction between separate posts and comments.
Keywords: dialogue, dialogicity, resemblance, meta-representation, accommodation, commenting, Facebook posts
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Two approaches to resemblance
    • 2.1Meta-representation through resemblance
    • 2.2Accommodation theory
  • 3.Data and context
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Netanyahu’s rhetoric
    • 3.3Political slogans
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1A scale of resemblance
      • 4.1.1Type A: Full resemblance: The chameleon effect
      • 4.1.2Type B: Discursive resemblance
      • 4.1.3Type C: Resemblance with stance explicitation
    • 4.2Type D: Ironic echoic mention
    • 4.3Ambiguity
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 December 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21022.wei
References (51)
References
Atifi, Hassan and Michel Marcoccia. 2015. “Follow-ups and dialogue in online discussions on French politics.” In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence Berlin, 109–140. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkin, Hila. 2019. Interactivity in Readers’ Ironic Comments to On-Line Op-Eds. on the Website of the “Haaretz” Newspaper: Threads and Ripples. Unpublished PhD dissertation, submitted to the Senate of Bar-Ilan University, supervised by Elda Weizman (in Hebrew).
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. In The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. ed. by Michael Holquist, trans. by Caryl Emerson. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, ed. and trans. by Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, ed. by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, trans. by Vern W. McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Chartrand, Tanya L. and John L. Bargh. 1999. “The Chameleon Effect: The Perception-Behavior Link and Social Interaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 (6): 893–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Condit, Celeste and John Lucaites. 1993. Crafting Equality: America’s Anglo-African Word. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Cristian, Michael Gamon and Susan Dumais. 2011. “Mark my Words! Linguistic Style Accommodation in Social Media”. WWW 2011, March 28–April 1, 2011, Hyderabad, India. ACM 978-1-4503-0632-4/11/03.Google Scholar
Galois, Cindy, Tania Ogay and Howard Giles. 2006. “Communication Accommodation Theory: A Look Back and a Look Ahead.” In Theorizing about communication and culture, ed. by W. B. Gudykunst, 121–148. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Gitay, Yehoshua. 2016. “Netanyahu in the USA Congress”. Israel Studies in Language and Society 9 (1–2): 20–28 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Ireland, Molly E., Richard B. Slatcher, Paul W. Eastwick, Lauren E. Scissors, Eli J. Finkel and James W. Pennebaker. 2011. “Language Style Matching Predicts Relationship Initiation and Stability.” Psychological Science 22 (1): 39–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishak, Wan Irham and Shameem Rafik-Galea. 2015. “Speech Accommodation Strategies in the Selling of Life Insurance.” Pertanika, Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities 231: 143–157.Google Scholar
Johansson, Marjut. 2015. “Bravo for this editorial! Users’ comments in discussion forums.” In Follow-ups in Political Discourse. Explorations across contexts and discourse domains, ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer, 83–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohn, A. 2003, “Comic strip, poem, and journal article: Three models of image/text.” In Hebrew – A Living Language 3, ed. by Rina Ben-Shahar and Gideon Toury, 167–189. Tel-Aviv: Hakibbutz Hamehuchad and the Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Kohn, Ayelet. 2011. “From a slight smile to scathing sarcasm: Shades of humor as means of criticism in Israeli photojournalism.” Misgarot Media 71: 29–54. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
. 2016. “The Polyphonic Framing of Ehud Olmert.” Israel studies in Language and Society 9 (1–2): 116–141. [In Hebrew.]Google Scholar
. 2019. “Iconic Televised Situations.” In Hebrew – A Living Language 8, ed. by Rina Ben-Shahar and Nitsa Ben-Ari, 153–176. Tel-Aviv: Hakibbutz Hamehuchad and the Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
Lakin, Jessica L., Valerie E. Jefferis, Clara Michelle Cheng, and Tanya L. Chartrand. 2003. “The Chameleon Effect as Social Glue: Evidence for the Evolutionary Significance of Nonconscious Mimicry.” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 271:145–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Anat, Oren Miara, Sarit Malayev, and Vered Silber-Varod. 2018. “The Influence of the Interlocutor’s Gender on the Speaker’s Role Identification”. In: Speech and Computer (SPECOM 2018). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 110961, ed. by Alexey Karpov, Oliver Jokisch and Rodmonga Potapova, 321–330. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Litt, Eden, and Eszter Hargittai. 2016. “The Imagined Audience on Social Network Sites.” Social Media and Society 2(1): 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Xing. 1999. “An Ideological/Cultural Analysis of Political Slogans in Communist China.” Discourse & Society 10(4): 487–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livnat, Zohar and Beverly Lewin. 2016. “The Interpersonal Strand of Political Speech: Recruiting the Audience in PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s Speeches”. Language and Dialogue 6(20): 275–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Sankar, Alessandro D’Ausilio, Noël Nguyen, Luciano Fadiga, and Leonardo Badino. 2017. The Relationship Between F0 Synchrony and Speech Convergence in Dyadic Interaction. Interspeech, August 2017: 2341–2345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niederhoffer, Kate G. and James W. Pennebaker. 2002. “Linguistic style matching in social interaction.” Journal of language and Social Psychology 21(4): 337–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pardo, Jennifer S. 2006. “On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 19 (4): 2382–2393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pardo, Jennifer S., Adelya Urmanche, Sherilyn Wilman, Jaclyn Wiener, Nicholas Mason, Keagan Francis, and Melanie Ward. 2018. “A comparison of phonetic convergence in conversational interaction and speech shadowing.” Journal of Phonetics 691: 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park-Fuller, Linda M. 1986. “Voices: Bakhtin’s Heteroglossia and Polyphony, and the Performance of Narrative Literature”, Literature in Performance 7 (1):1–12. Online at: [URL] (accessed 17 November 2020). DOI logo
Perelman, Chaïm et Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1958. Le Traité de l’argumentation, la nouvelle rhétorique. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Reddy, Michael. 1979. “The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language.” In Metaphor and thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 284–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina. 2019. “’Well, Yair? When Will You Be Prime Minister?’: Different Readings of Ordinariness in a Politician’s Facebook Post as a Case in Point.” In The Construction of Ordinariness across Media Genres, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Elda Weizman, 103–129. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020a. “The Right to Speak and the Request to Remain Silent: Who Own Politicians’ Facebook Pages?” Israel Affairs 26 (1): 26–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020b. “Hero, genius, king and Messiah”: Ironic echoing in pro-ethos and anti-ethos readers’ comments on Facebook posts”. In The Discourse of Indirectness: Cues, voices and functions, ed. by Zohar Livnat, Pnina Shukrun-Nagar and Galia Hirsch, 59–82. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. “Constructed General Truths against Specific Political Rivals in Politicians’ Facebook Posts”. Journal of Pragmatics 1721: 79–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silber-Varod, Vered, Sarit Malayev, and Anat Lerner. 2020. “Positioning oneself in different roles: Structural and lexical measures of power relations between speakers in map task corpus.” Speech Communication 1171:1 – 12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 2000. “Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective”. In Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Dan Sperber, 117–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1981. “Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction.” In Peter Cole, ed., Radical Pragmatics, 295–318. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice. 2020. “Reconceptualizing mirroring: Sound imitation and rapport in naturally occurring interaction”. Journal of Pragmatics 1671: 131–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weise, Andreas and Rivka Levitan. 2018. “Looking for structure in lexical and acoustic-prosodic entrainment behaviors.” Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2018, 297–302. New Orleans, Louisiana, June 1 – 6, 2018. Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weise, Andreas, Vered Silber-Varod, Anat Lerner, Julia Hirschberg and Rivka Levitan. 2021. “’Talk to me with left, right, and angles’: Lexical entrainment in spoken Hebrew dialogue”. Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2021), Online conference, 19–23 April, 2021. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda. 1984. “Some register characteristics of discourse structure in journalisitic language.” Applied Linguistics V/11: 39-50.Google Scholar
. 2008. Positioning in Media Dialogue: The Case of News Interviews on Israeli Television. Amsterdam/Philadelphia John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar.
. 2012. “Irony in news interviews: Dialogism and intertexuality”. In Slovo a Slovesnost, Special Issue on Intertexuality, Polyphony, Heteroglossia, ed. by Svetla Cmejrková and Jana Hoffmannová, 253–262. Prague: Charles University.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Irony in and through follow-ups: talk and meta-talk in online commenting.” In The Dynamics of Political Discourse, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence Berlin, 173–194. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Ironic commenting on op-eds: obstructing discussion.” Israel Studies in Language and Society 9(1–2): 184–208 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
. 2019. “The discursive pattern ‘claim+ indirect quotation in quotation marks’: Strategic uses in French and Hebrew online journalism.” Journal of Pragmatics 1571: 131–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda and Gonen Dori-Hacohen. 2017. “Commenting on opinion editorials in on-line journals: A cross-cultural examination of face-work in the Washington Post (USA) and NRG (Israel).” Discourse, Context & Media 191: 39–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda and Anita Fetzer (eds.). 2019. Follow-Ups in Political Discourse: Explorations Across Contexts and Discourse Domains. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2012. “Metarepresentation in linguistic communication.” in Meaning and Relevance, ed. by Deirdre Wilson and Dan Sperber, 230–258, Cambridge University Press. [First published in Dan Sperber (ed.). 2000. Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford University Press, 2000, 411–48]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 1992. “On Verbal Irony.” Lingua 871: 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Explaining irony”, in Meaning and Relevance, ed. by Deirdre Wilson and Dan Sperber, 123–146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Weizman, Elda
2023. Recontextualization practices: A scale of directness. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.