Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 15:2 (2024) ► pp.295319
References (32)
Drew, Paul
1991 “Asymmetries of Knowledge in Conversational Interactions.” In Asymmetries in Dialogue, ed. by Ivana Marková, and Klaus Foppa, 21–48. Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Ekberg, Katie, and Amanda LeCouteur
2015 “Clients’ Resistance to Therapists’ Proposals: Managing Epistemic and Deontic Status.” Journal of Pragmatics 901: 12–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1955 “On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” Psychiatry 18 (3): 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2013 “Speaker Meaning and Accountability in Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 48 (1): 41–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
2018 “The Expression of Authority in US Primary Care: Offering Diagnoses and Recommending Treatment.” In Georgetown University Round Table 2018: Approaches to Discourse. Washington D.C., 9–11 March. Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Sue Sefi
1992 “Dilemmas of Advice: Aspects of the Delivery and Reception of Advice in Interactions between Health Visitors and First-Time Mothers.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew, and John Heritage, 359–417. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Izadi, Ahmad
2018 “The Epistemic Grounds of Face in Institutional Argumentative Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 1341: 45–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jager, Margot, and Wyke Stommel
2017 “The Risk of Metacommunication to Manage Interactional Trouble in Online Chat Counseling.” Linguistik online 87 (8): 191–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinnell, Ann Marie K., and Douglas W. Maynard
1996 “The Delivery and Receipt of Safer Sex Advice in Pretest Counseling Sessions for HIV and AIDS.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24 (4): 405–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koenig, Christopher J.
2011 “Patient Resistance as Agency in Treatment Decisions.” Social Science & Medicine 721: 1105–1114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landmark, Anne Marie Dalby, Pål Gulbrandsen, and Jan Svennevig
2015 “Whose Decision? Negotiating Epistemic and Deontic Rights in Medical Treatment Decisions.” Journal of Pragmatics 781: 54–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehtinen, Esa
2007 “Merging Doctor and Client Knowledge: On Doctors’ Ways of Dealing with Clients’ Potentially Discrepant Information in Genetic Counseling.” Journal of Pragmatics 391: 389–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehtinen, Esa, and Helena Kääriäinen
2005 “Doctor’s Expertise and Managing Discrepant Information from Other Sources in Genetic Counseling: A Conversation Analytic Perspective.” Journal of Genetic Counseling 14 (6): 435–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Franziska Thurnherr
2017 “Typing Yourself Healthy: Introduction to the Special Issue on Language and Health Online.” Linguistik online 87 (8): 3–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lukes, Steven
1978 “Power and Authority.” In A History of Sociological Analysis, ed. by Tom Bottomore, and Robert Nisbet, 633–676. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter
2013 “Resistance in Couples Counselling: Sequences of Talk that Disrupt Progressivity and Promote Disaffiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics 491: 18–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter, and Kwok Tim Choi
2010 “Not Remembering as a Practical Epistemic Resource in Couples Therapy.” Discourse Studies 12 (3): 331–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ran, Yongping, and Xu Huang
2019 “Deontic Authority in Intervention Discourse: Insights from Bystander Intervention.” Discourse Studies 21 (5): 540–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverman, David
1997Discourses of Counselling: HIV Counselling as Social Interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa
2013 “Deontic Rights in Interaction: A Conversation Analytic Study on Authority and Cooperation.” PhD diss., University of Helsinki.
2018 “Social Deontics: A Nano-Level Approach to Human Power Play.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 481: 369–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Anssi Peräkylä
2012 “Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (3): 297–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Three Orders in the Organization of Human Action: On the Interface between Knowledge, Power, and Emotion in Interaction and Social Relations.” Language in Society 43 (2): 185–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa, and Jan Svennevig
2015 “Introduction: Epistemics and Deontics in Conversational Directives.” Journal of Pragmatics 781: 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2005 “Parent Resistance to Physicians’ Treatment Recommendations: One Resource for Initiating a Negotiation of the Treatment Decision.” Health Communication 18 (1): 41–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Treatment Decisions: Negotiations between Doctors and Parents in Acute Care Encounters.” In Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, ed. by John Heritage, and Douglas W. Maynard, 279–312. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Rebecca K. Barnes
2018 “Treatment Recommendation Actions, Contingencies, and Responses: An introduction.” Health Communication 33 (11): 1331–1334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Stefan Timmermans
2020 “Medical Authority under Siege: How Clinicians Transform Patient Resistance into Acceptance.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 61 (1): 60–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig
2011a “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 3–24. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2011bThe Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yao, Xue-Li, and Wen Ma
2017 “Question Resistance and Its Management in Chinese Psychotherapy.” Discourse Studies 19 (2): 216–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yu
2021 “How Doctors Do Things with Empathy in Online Medical Consultations in China: A Discourse-Analytic Approach.” Health Communication 36 (7): 816–825. DOI logoGoogle Scholar