Cover not available
Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society
Vol. 14:6 (2023) ► pp.883–907

The role of assessments in providing evasive answers in news interviews

ORCID logo | Majmaah UniversityAl-Majmaah
| University of Leeds
This paper examines the role of assessments in the design of interviewees’ answers in news interviews settings on two Arabic networks. It employs a Conversation Analysis approach, in addition to quantitative analysis, to observe the most recurrent positions for emerging assessments in interviewees’ answers. In addition, it examines the role of these assessments in providing evasive answers to interviewers’ questions. The data consists of twenty-eight hours of recorded Arab news interviews from four shows: Liqāʾ Xāṣ (Special Interview) and Bilā Ḥudūd (Without Bounds) on Aljazeera and Nuqṭat Niḏ̣ām (Point of Order) and Muqābalah Xāṣah (Special Interview) on Al-Arabiya. The findings reveal that assessments emerge in recurrent positions in interviewees’ answers and play a role in their design. Likewise, they show the role of assessments in the design of evasive answers.
Keywords: assessments, epistimicity, news interviews, evasive answers, Arab media, conversation analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Assessments
  • 3.Assessments in interviewees’ answers
  • 4.Data and method
  • 5.Results and discussion
    • 5.1Assessments in turn-beginnings
      • 5.1.1Assessments that address interviewers’ displayed assessments
      • 5.1.2Displayed assessments to address the accuracy of questions propositions
      • 5.1.3Assessments that introduce new assessables
    • 5.2Assessments in interviewees’ turn-endings
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 11 April 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.21056.alr
References (35)
References
Abdullah, Saeed and Mokhtar Elareshi. 2015. “Building narratives: A study of terrorism framing by Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya TV networks”. Arab Media & Society 211: 1–14.Google Scholar
Alroumi, Abdulrahman and El Mustapha Lahlali. 2022. “The accountability of assessments in news interviews”. Discourse & Communication 15(6): 3–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2009. “Dimensions of evaluation: Cognitive and linguistic perspectives”. Pragmatics and Cognition 7(1): 146–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carranza, Ariel. 2016. “Evading and resisting answering”. Pragmatics and Society 7(4): 570–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chovanec, Jan. 2020. “‛Those are not my words’: Evasion and metalingual accountability in political scandal talk.” Journal of Pragmatics 1581: 66–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven. 2001. “Answers and evasions”. Language in Society 30(3): 403–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Conversation nalysis in the news interview.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 630–656. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “The micropolitics of legitimacy: Political positioning and journalistic scrutiny at the boundary of the mainstream”. Social Psychology Quarterly 80(1): 41–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven and John Heritage. 2002. The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca. 2016. Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek and Jonathan Potter. 2012. Descriptions and Assessments [paper presentation]. Conference on Discourse-Communication-Conversation, Loughborough, United Kingdom, March 20–22 2012.
. 2017. “Some uses of subject-side assessments”. Discourse Studies 19(5): 497–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekström, Mats, Monika Djerf-Pierre, Bengt Johansson, and Nicklas Håkansson. 2016. “Negotiating politicians’ responsibilities in news interviews”. Journalism Practice 10(8): 983–1004. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmertsen, Sofie. 2007. “Interviewers’ challenging questions in British debate interviews”. Journal of Pragmatics 39(3): 570–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, Robert. 2007. Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. and Sandra A. Thompson. 2010. “Responses to Wh-questions in English conversation”. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43(2): 133–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabrielsen, Jonas, Heidi Jønch-Clausen, and Chrisina Pontoppidan. 2020. “Answering without answering: Shifting as an evasive rhetorical strategy”. Journalism 21(9): 1355–1370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin. 1987. “Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assesments”. Papers in Pragmatics 1(1): 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John and David Greatbatch. 1986. “Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences”. American Journal of Sociology 921: 110–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan and John Sinclair. 2000. “Towards a local grammar of evaluation.” In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson, 74–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lahlali, Mustapha. 2011. Contemporary Arab broadcast media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge Universiy Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddicoat, Anthony J. 2011. An introduction to conversation analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna and Lorenza Mondada. 2009. “Assessments in social interaction: Introduction to the special issue”. Research on Language & Social Interaction 42(4): 299–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James and Peter White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piirainen-Marsh, Arja. 2005. “Managing adversarial questioning in broadcast interviews”. Journal of Politeness Research 1(2): 193–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piirainen-Marsh, Arja and Heidi Jauni. 2012. “Assessments and the social construction of expertise in political TV interviews”. Text and Talk 32(5): 637–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita M. 1984. “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.” In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, ed. by Maxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding”. American Sociological Review 68(6): 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey and John Heritage. 2006. “The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren”. Language in Society 35(5), 677–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Harvey Sacks. 1973. “Opening up closings”. Semiotica 8(4): 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya and Makoto Hayashi. 2010. “Transformative answers: One way to resist a questions constraints”. Language in Society 39(1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff and Laura Alba-Juez. 2014. Evaluation in Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue and Celia Kitzinger. 2008. “Conversation analysis”. In The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology, ed. by Wendy Stainton-Rogers and Carla Willig, 54–72. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Alroumi, Abdulrahman
2024. Equivocation in media communication. Journal of Language and Politics DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.