References (58)
Adami, Elisabeth
2014 “What’s in a click? A social semiotic framework for the multimodal analysis of website interactivity.” Visual Communication 14 (2): 133–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brucks, Merrie
1985 “The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior.” Journal of Consumer Research 12 (1): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Button, Graham
1991Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, Andy, David M. Nichols, Mark Rouncefield, and Michael B. Twidale
2000 “The contribution of ethnomethodologycally-informed ethnography to the process of designing digital libraries.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (7): 666–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, Andy, Michael Twidale, Jon O’Brien, and David Nichols
1997 “Talking in the Library: Implications for the Design of Digital Libraries.” Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference of Digital Libraries. Philadelphia: Association of Computing Machinery, 221–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crook, Charles
2015 “The Field of Digital Technology Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Digital Technology Research ed. by Sara Price, Carey Jewitt, and Barry Brown, 26–40. London: Sage.Google Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys
2013 “The collaborative organisation of next actions in a semiotically rich environment: Shopping as a couple.” In Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion ed. by Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 123–151. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Establishing joint orientation towards commercial objects in a self-service store.” In Interaction with Objects Language, materiality, and social activity, ed. by Maurice Nevile, Pentti Haddington, Trine Heinemann, and Mika Rauniomaa, 271–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John
2007 [1910]How we think. New York: Cosimo.Google Scholar
Dourish, Paul, and Graham Button
1998 “On ‘technomethodology’: Foundational relationships between ethnomethodology and system design.” Human-Computer Interaction 131: 395–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frohlich, David, Paul Drew, and A. Monk
1994 “Management of repair in human-computer interaction.” Human-Computer Interaction, ACM Press 9 (4): 385–425. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1963 “A conception of, and experiments with, ‘trust’ as a condition of stable concerted actions.” In Motivation and social interaction, ed. by O. J. Harvey, 187–238. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2006Seeing Sociologically. The Routine Grounds of Social Action. Boulder, Colo.: Paradigm Press [1948]Google Scholar
Guo, Chiquan
2001 “A Review on Consumer External Search: Amount and Determinants.” Journal of Business and Psychology 151: 505–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hazel, Spencer, Kristian Mortensen, and Gitte Rasmusen
2014 “A Body of Resources: CA Studies in Social ConductJournal of Pragmatics. 651: 10–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Christian, and Paul Luff
2000Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa, and Galina Bolden
2012 “The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription”. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 57–76. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilbert, Richard A.
1990 “Ethnomethodology and the Micro-Macro Order.” American Sociological Review 55 (6): 794–808. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Robert, and Günther Kress
1998Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hong, Weiyin, James Y. L. Thong, and Kar Yan Tam
2004 “Effects of Information Format and Shopping Task on Consumers’ Online Shopping Behavior: A Cognitive Fit Perspective.” Journal of Management Information Systems 21 (3): 149–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housley, William, and Richard Fitzgerald
2009 “Membership Categorization, Culture and Norms in Action.” Discourse & Society 20 (3): 345–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hua, Zhu, Emi Otsuji, and Alastair Pennycook
2017 “Multilingual, Multisensory and Multimodal Repertoires in Corner Shops, Streets and Markets.” Social Semiotics 27 (4): 383–543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, Carey
2015Multimodal Methods for Researching Digital Technologies. In The SAGE Handbook of Digital Technology Research, ed. by Sara Price, Carey Jewitt, and Barry Brouwn, 250–265. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H., and Paul Drew
2016 “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 49 (1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotler, Philip, Kevin L. Keller, and Alexander Chernev
2009Marketing Management. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
Kress, Günther
2010Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, Günther, and Theo van Leeuwen
2001Multimodal Discourse: the Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Elisabeth D. and Gitte Rasmussen
(2021) ‟Using Eye‑tracking Recordings as Data in EMCA Studies.” Social Interaction – Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality 4(4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Jay L.
2002 ‟Travels in hypermodality.” Visual Communication 1(3): 299–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Kenneth
2011 “The reflexive intelligibility of affairs: ethnomethodological perpectives on communicating sense.” Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure 641: 73–99.Google Scholar
2013More Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York and Albany: State University of New York Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loebbecke, Claudia
2002 “Digital goods: An economic perspective.” In Encyclopedia of Information Systems, ed. by Hossein Bidgoli, 635–647. San Diego, Cal.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas, and Steven Clayman
1991 “The diversity of ethnomethodology.” Annual Review of Sociology 171: 385–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Christian, Jürgen Streeck, and J. Scott Jordan
2017Intercorporeality – Emerging Socialities in Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2016 “Multimodal resources and the organization of social interaction” In Handbooks of Communication Science, ed. by Andrea Rocci, and Louis De Saussure, 328–350. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “The multimodal interactional organization of tasting: Practices of tasting cheese in gourmet shops.” Discourse Studies 20 (6): 743–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 “Participants’ orientations to material and sensorial features of objects: looking, touching, smelling and tasting while requesting products in shops.” Gesprächsforschung 201: 461–494. [URL]
2022 “Appealing to the senses: Approaching, sensing, and interacting at the market’s stall.” Discourse & Communication 16 (2), 160–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Robert J., Elisabeth F. Churchill, and Rai G. P. Kantamneni
2011 “Three Sequential Positions of Query Repairiin Interactions with Internet Search Engines. CSCW’ 11 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Hangzhou, China: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Norris, Sigrid
2004Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York and London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, Søren V.
2022 “The same but different: A social semiotic analysis of website interactivity as discourse.” Discourse & Communication 6 (2): 249–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rahman, Mohammad A., Aminul Islam, Bushra H. Esha, Nahida Sultana, and Sujan Chakravorty
2018 “Consumer buying behavior towards online shopping: An empirical study on Dhaka city, Bangladesh.” Cogent Business & Management 51: 1514940. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, Gitte, Spencer Hazel, and Kristian Mortensen
2014 “A body of resources – CA studies in social conduct.” Journal of Pragmatics 651: 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, Gitte, and Elisabeth D. Kristiansen
2022 “The sociality of minimizing involvement in self-service shops in Denmark: Customers’ multi-modal practices of being, getting and staying out of the way.” Discourse & Communication 16 (2): 200–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, Gitte, and Theo van Leeuwen
(eds.) 2022 “The human touch – Analyzing online and offline shopping.” Discourse & Communication 16 (2), 149–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds.) 2024Multimodality and Social Interaction in Online and Offline Shopping (1st ed.). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rawls, Anne W.
2005 “Garfinkel’s Conception of Time.” Time & Society 14 (2–3): 163–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowley, Jennifer
2000 “Product search in e‑shopping: A review and research propositions.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 17 (1): 20–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
1996 “Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action.” American Journal of Sociology 102 (1): 161–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schutz, Alfred
1962 “The Problem of Social Reality.” In Collected Papers, Vol 11, ed. by Maurice Natanson. The Hague, Boston and London: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Shah, Caryn S., and Anindita Paul
2020 “Information Seeking Behaviour in Online Shopping.” In Re‑imagining Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology and Systems: A Continuing Conversation, ed. by Sujeet K. Sharma, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Bhimaraya Metri, and Nripendra P. Rana, 439–450. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis D. LeBaron
2011Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Twidale, Michel B., Damon Chaplin, Andy Crabtree, David M. Nichols, Jon O’Brien, and Mark Rouncefield
1997Collaboration in Physical and Digital Libraries. British Library Research and Innovation Centre Report 64.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Jan, and Kenneth Hacker
2003 “The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon.” The Information Society 19 (4): 315–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zammit, Katine
2007The construction of student pathways during information-seeking sessions using hypermedia programs: A social semiotic perspective. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Western Sydney.