On the constitutional relevance of non‑discursive enlanguaged doings to sociomaterial practices
In expanding on the ‘dynamics first, symbols afterwards’ principle (
Cowley
2009) of Distributed Language research, I propose that embodied linguistic competencies comprise the prerequisite for
human agents to engage in sociomaterial practices. I make the case that human practical activity is fundamentally ‘enlanguaged’
and that linguistic skills are not only trans-practical in the sense of enabling agents to engage in diverse activities across
practices but also that they constitute the basis for adult skill acquisition (see
Dreyfus and
Dreyfus 1986) more generally. Specifically, I explore language-relative skills as the enablers of more diverse
activities than what is prescribed to them by Saussurean linguistic tradition i.e., the denotative relations intrinsic to
linguistic signs as well the rule-governed combinations of such signs into meaningful sentences.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Languaging as the starting point
- 3.From language to languaging (or ‘sayings’) and enlanguaged doings: Critically expanding on the accounts of Linell and
Schatzki
- 4.The constitutive role of conceptual know-how in practical activity and practices
- 5.Wrapping up
- Notes
-
References
References (37)
References
Chomsky, Noam. 2007. “Of
minds and
language.” Biocommunication 11: 9–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cowley, Stephen J. 2013. “Naturalizing language: human
appraisal and (quasi) technology.” AI &
Society 28 (4):443–453. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cowley, Stephen J. 2019. “Languaging
evolved.” Chinese Semiotic
Studies 15 (4):461–482. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cowley, Stephen J. 2020. “Living and Languaging Are
Self-Fabrication.” Constructivist
Foundations 15 (2): 135–137.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cowley, Stephen J. & Gahrn-Andersen Rasmus. 2022. “Languaging
in an enlanguaged world.” Constructivist
Foundations 18 (1): 54–57.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. 2009. A
Thousand Plateaus. London & New York: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dreyfus, Stuart E., and Hubert L. Dreyfus. 1986. Mind
over Machine. New York: Free Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2014. “Overcoming the Myth of the
Mental: How Philosophers Can Profit from the Phenomenology of Everyday
Expertise.” In Skillful Coping: Essays on the phenomenology of
everyday perception and action, ed. by Hubert L. Dreyfus, and Mark A. Wrathall. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gahrn-Andersen, Rasmus. 2021. “Conceptual
attaching in perception and practice-based
behavior.” Lingua 2491, 102960. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gahrn-Andersen, Rasmus, and Stephen J. Cowley. 2017. “Phenomenology
& Sociality: How Extended Normative Perturbations Give Rise to Social
Agency”. Intellectica 671: 379–398. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gahrn-Andersen, Rasmus, and Stephen J. Cowley. 2022. “Autonomous
technologies in human ecologies: enlanguaged cognition, practices and technology.” AI &
Society
37
(2): 687–699. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guattari, Felix. 1995. Chaosmosis:
an ethico-aesthetic paradigm. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, Roy. 1981. The
Language
Myth. London: Duckworth.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hutchins, Edwin. 2005. “Material
anchors for conceptual blends.” Journal of
Pragmatics 371: 1555–1577. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hutchins, Edwin. 2014. “The
cultural ecosystem of human cognition.” Philosophical
Psychology 27 (1): 34–49. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kravchenko, Alexander V. 2021. “Constructing a Constructivist
View of Language.” Constructivist
Foundations 17 (1): 22–24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kravchenko, Alexander V. 2022. “The maturanian turn: Good
prospects for the language sciences”. Constructivist
Foundations 18 (1): 30–41.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Latour, Bruno. 1996. “On
Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications.” Soziale
Welt 47 (4): 369–381.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Jia, Steffensen, Sune V., and Guowen Huang. 2020. “Rethinking
ecolinguistics from a distributed language perspective.” Language
Sciences 801, 101277. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Linell, Per. 1982. The
Written Language Bias in Linguistics (University of Linköping Studies in Communication
2). Linköping University, Linköping.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking
Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human
Sense-Making. Information Age Publishing: Charlotte, NC.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Linell, Per. 2013. “Distributed
language theory, with or without dialogue.” Language
Sciences 401: 168–173. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Love, Nigel. 2004. “Cognition
and the language myth.” Language
Sciences 261: 525–544. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Love, Nigel. 2017. “On
languaging and languages.” Language
Sciences 611: 113–147. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maturana, Humberto R. 1988. “Reality: The Search for
Objectivity or the Quest for a Compelling Argument.” The Irish Journal of
Psychology 9 (1): 25–82. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maturana, Humberto R. 2002. “Autopoiesis, Structural
Coupling and Cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of
cognition.” Cybernetics & Human
Knowing 9 (3–4): 5–34.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maturana, Humberto R. 2006. “Self-consciousness: How? When?
Where?”. Constructivist
Foundations 1 (3): 91–102.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morgan, Thomas, Uomini, Natalie, Rendell, Luke et al. 2015. “Experimental
evidence for the co-evolution of hominin tool-making teaching and language”. Nature
Communications 61. Article number 6029. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raimondi, Vincenzo. 2019. “The
bio-logic of languaging and its epistemological background.” Language
Sciences 711: 19–26. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916/1959. Course in general
linguistics. New York: Philosophical library.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schatzki, Theodore. R. 2002. The site of the social: a philosophical
account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thibault, Paul. 2017. “The
reflexivity of human languaging and Nigel Love’s two orders of language.” Language
Science 611: 74–85. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thibault, Paul J. 2019. “Simplex selves, functional
synergies, and selving: Languaging in a complex world.” Language
Sciences 711: 49–67. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thibault, Paul J. 2022. Distributed Languaging, Affective
Dynamics, and The Human Ecology – Volume 1: The Sense-making Body (Routledge Advances in Communication
and Linguistic Theory). Routledge: London & New York.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turner, Jonathan H. & David E. Boynes. 2006. The
Return of Grand Theory. In Handbook of Sociological
Theory, ed. by Jonathan H. Turner, 353–378. New York: Springer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2009. Philosophical
Investigations. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Fester-Seeger, Marie-Theres
2024.
How a Child Learns to ‘Talk’ to a Smart Speaker: On the Emergence of Enlanguaged Practices.
Linguistic Frontiers 7:1
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Gahrn-Andersen, Rasmus
2024.
Introduction to the Special Issue on Enlanguaged Practices.
Linguistic Frontiers 7:1
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Raimondi, Vincenzo
2024.
Rethinking Sociality in Language Evolution: Enlanguagement as a Catalyst for Shifts in Developmental Pathways.
Linguistic Frontiers 7:1
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.