Negotiating academic conflict in discussion sections of doctoral dissertations
This study explores how doctoral students negotiated academic conflict (AC) in discussion section of their dissertations and what engagement resources they utilized to convey academic conflict. To this end, discussion chapters of 30 doctoral dissertations in Applied Linguistics (15 samples by each writer group) were analyzed using Huston’s (1991) academic conflict framework and Martin and White’s (2005) engagement system of Appraisal Theory. The functional analysis constituted discovering components of academic conflict and engagement resources in the discussions. We found that components of academic conflict determined engagement values used to convey them. The linguistic background of the authors was less of an issue in resolving conflicts. The two writer groups managed academic conflict and related engagement resources more or less similarly in different components of academic conflict. They mainly expressed their novel contribution readily and identified the flaws of previous research; however, both writer groups showed little tendency to explain controversial points. The findings have pedagogical implications for academic writing courses highlighting the importance of developing awareness of AC and resolving the conflicts.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.1Hunston’s Framework of Academic Conflict
- 2.2Engagement system
- 3.Method
- 3.1Materials
- 3.2Data analysis
- 4.Results
- 4.1Employment of AC in the discussion sections of Ph.D. dissertations
- 4.2.1Engagement values in specific components of AC in the discussion section of Ph.D. dissertations
- 1.CR through outlining the differences in study objectives and methodologies
- 2.CR through explanation of discrepancies in sample groups
- 3.CR through emphasizing differences in study contexts
- 4.2.2Comparisons between the two graduate writer groups in their employment of engagement resources in AC components
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
-
References