Cover not available
Article published In:
Ideophones: Between Grammar and Poetry
Edited by Katherine Lahti, Rusty Barrett and Anthony K. Webster
[Pragmatics and Society 5:3] 2014
► pp. 384–405

Making new ideophones in Siwu

Creative depiction in conversation

 | Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Ideophones are found in many of the world’s languages. Though they are a major word class on a par with nouns and verbs, their origins are ill-understood, and the question of ideophone creation has been a source of controversy. This paper studies ideophone creation in naturally occurring speech. New, unconventionalised ideophones are identified using native speaker judgements, and are studied in context to understand the rules and regularities underlying their production and interpretation. People produce and interpret new ideophones with the help of the semiotic infrastructure that underlies the use of existing ideophones: foregrounding frames certain stretches of speech as depictive enactments of sensory imagery, and various types of iconicity link forms and meanings. As with any creative use of linguistic resources, context and common ground also play an important role in supporting rapid ‘good enough’ interpretations of new material. The making of new ideophones is a special case of a more general phenomenon of creative depiction: the art of presenting verbal material in such a way that the interlocutor recognises and interprets it as a depiction.
Keywords: ideophones, semiotics, Siwu, iconicity, conversation, depiction, creativity
Published online: 14 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.5.3.04din
References (47)
Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald. 2004. Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Childs, G. Tucker. 1989. “Where do Ideophones Come From?” Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 19 (2): 55–76.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Where Have all the Ideophones Gone? The Death of a Word Category in Zulu.” Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 151: 81–103.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V., and Herbert H. Clark. 1979. “When Nouns Surface as Verbs.” Language 55 (4): 767–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. “Quotations as Demonstrations.” Language 66 (4): 764–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: 
Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. in press. “Ideophones and Reduplication: On the Interpretation of Repeated Talk in Discourse.” Studies in Language.
. 2011a. “The Meaning and Use of Ideophones in Siwu.” Ph.D. dissertation, Nijmegen: Radboud University. [URL].
. 2011b. “Ezra Pound among the Mawu: Ideophones and Iconicity in Siwu.” In Semblance and Signification, ed. by Pascal Michelucci, Olga Fischer, and Christina Ljungberg, 39–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Advances in the Cross-linguistic Study of Ideophones.” Language and Linguistics Compass 6 (10): 654–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Ideophones and Gesture in Everyday Speech.” Gesture 13 (2): 143–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N.J. 2009. The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances. 
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Sources of Asymmetry in Human Interaction: Enchrony, Status, Knowledge, and Agency.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 285–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda, and Nikole D. Patson. 2007. “The ‘Good Enough’Approach to Language Comprehension.” Language and Linguistics Compass 1 (1–2): 71–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortune, G. 1971. “Some Notes on Ideophones and Ideophonic Constructions in Shona.” African Studies 30 (3): 237–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gombrich, E.H. 2002. Art & Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. (6th ed.). London & New York: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. “Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories in Crosslinguistic Studies.” Language 86 (3): 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, David W. 2000. “No Nonsense: The Logic and Power of Acoustic-Iconic Mnemonic Systems.” British Journal of Ethnomusicology 9 (2): 93–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell H. 1985. “Some Subtleties of Measured Verse.” In Proceedings, Niagara Linguistic Society, 15th Spring Conference, ed. by June Hesch, 13–57. Buffalo: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, and Linda R. Waugh. 1979. The Sound Shape of Language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 43–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo. 2010. “Bodily Quoting in Dance Correction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (4): 401–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1998. A Theory of Linguistic Signs. Trans by. Duenwald Kimberley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klassen, Doreen Helen. 1999. “You Can’t Have Silence with Your Palms Up: Ideophones, Gesture, and Iconicity in Zimbabwean Shona Women’s Ngano (Storysong) Performance.” Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Kunene, Daniel P. 1965. “The Ideophone in Southern Sotho.” Journal of African Languages 41: 19–39.Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Noss, Philip A. 2001. “Ideas, Phones and Gbaya Verbal Art.” In Ideophones, ed. by F.K. Erhard Voeltz, and Christa Kilian-Hatz, 259–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B. 1996. Sounds Like Life: Sound-Symbolic Grammar, Performance, and Cognition in Pastaza Quechua. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “To Be or To Be Not Ideophonically Impoverished.” In SALSA XI: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium about Language and Society, Austin, ed. by Wai Fong Chiang, Elaine Chun, Laura Mahalingappa, and Siri Mehus, 131–142. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1970. “Inventory and Choice in Expressive Language.” Word 261: 153–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1971. “Survey of Bantu Ideophones.” African Language Studies 121: 130–168.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret. 1994. “Emphatic Speech Style – with Special Focus on the Prosodic Signalling of Heightened Emotive Involvement in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 22 (3–4): 375–408. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Shintel, Hadas, Howard C. Nusbaum, and Arika Okrent. 2006. “Analog Acoustic Expression in Speech Communication.” Journal of Memory and Language 55 (2): 167–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sundberg, Johan. 1994. “Musical Significance of Musicians’ Syllable Choice in Improvised Nonsense Text Singing: A Preliminary Study.” Phonetica 51 (1–3): 132–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Kevin J. 2006. KA-BOOM! A Dictionary of Comic Book Words, Symbols & Onomatopoeia. Mora Publications, November 1.Google Scholar
von Staden, Paul M.S. 1977. “Some Remarks on Ideophones in Zulu.” African Studies 36 (2): 195–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Kendall L. 1973. “Pictures and Make-Believe.” The Philosophical Review 82 (3): 283–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Welmers, William E. 1973. African Language Structures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Werner, Heinz, and Bernard Kaplan. 1963. Symbol Formation; An Organismic-Developmental Approach to Language and the Expression of Thought. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Westermann, Diedrich Hermann. 1927. “Laut, Ton und Sinn in westafrikanischen Sudansprachen.” In Festschrift Meinhof, ed. by Franz Boas, 315–328. Hamburg: L. Friederichsen.Google Scholar
Ziervogel, D. 1952. A Grammar of Swazi. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M., and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1987. “Plain Morphology and Expressive Morphology.” In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by John Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis, and Hana Filip, 71, 330–340. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Cited by (21)

Cited by 21 other publications

Albert, Saul & Dirk vom Lehn
2023. Non-lexical vocalizations help novices learn joint embodied actions. Language & Communication 88 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Nomikou, Iris
2023. Joining actions through effort sounds: Mothers and infants in routine activities. Language & Communication 91 ► pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Beukeleers, Inez & Myriam Vermeerbergen
2022. Show Me What You’ve B/Seen: A Brief History of Depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Park, Ji-Yeon
2022. The phonosemantics of the Korean monosyllabic ideophone ttak . In Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 18], ► pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Thompson, Arthur L., May Pik Yu Chan, Ping Hei Yeung & Youngah Do
2022. Structural markedness and depiction. The Mental Lexicon 17:2 ► pp. 300 ff. DOI logo
Keevallik, Leelo
2021. Vocalizations in dance classes teach body knowledge. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s4 DOI logo
McLean, Bonnie
2021. Revising an implicational hierarchy for the meanings of ideophones, with special reference to Japonic. Linguistic Typology 25:3 ► pp. 507 ff. DOI logo
Tkacheva, Liubov, Maria Flaksman, Andrey Nasledov, Yulia Sedelkina & Yulia Lavitskaya
2021. Iconicity and Second Language Visual Perception: A Psycholinguistic Study of English Imitative Words at Different De-iconization Stages. Mathematics 9:12 ► pp. 1331 ff. DOI logo
DINGEMANSE, MARK & BILL THOMPSON
2020. Playful iconicity: structural markedness underlies the relation between funniness and iconicity. Language and Cognition 12:1 ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Edmiston, Pierce, Marcus Perlman & Gary Lupyan
2018. Repeated imitation makes human vocalizations more word-like. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285:1874 ► pp. 20172709 ff. DOI logo
Ferrara, Lindsay & Gabrielle Hodge
2018. Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo
Perlman, Marcus, Hannah Little, Bill Thompson & Robin L. Thompson
2018. Iconicity in Signed and Spoken Vocabulary: A Comparison Between American Sign Language, British Sign Language, English, and Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo
Taitz, Alan, M. Florencia Assaneo, Natalia Elisei, Mónica Trípodi, Laurent Cohen, Jacobo D. Sitt, Marcos A. Trevisan & Niels O. Schiller
2018. The audiovisual structure of onomatopoeias: An intrusion of real-world physics in lexical creation. PLOS ONE 13:3 ► pp. e0193466 ff. DOI logo
Nuckolls, Janis B., Tod D. Swanson, Diana Shelton, Alexander Rice & Sarah Hatton
2017. Lexicography in-your-face: The active semantics of Pastaza Quichua ideophones. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 62:2 ► pp. 154 ff. DOI logo
Styles, Suzy J. & Lauren Gawne
2017. When Does Maluma/Takete Fail? Two Key Failures and a Meta-Analysis Suggest That Phonology and Phonotactics Matter. i-Perception 8:4 DOI logo
Winter, Bodo, Marcus Perlman, Lynn K. Perry & Gary Lupyan
2017. Which words are most iconic?. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18:3 ► pp. 443 ff. DOI logo
Dingemanse, Mark
2015. Ideophones and reduplication. Studies in Language 39:4 ► pp. 946 ff. DOI logo
Dingemanse, Mark
2018. Redrawing the margins of language: Lessons from research on ideophones. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1 DOI logo
Dingemanse, Mark
2019. ‘Ideophone’ as a comparative concept. In Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 16], ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Enfield, N.J.
2015. Linguistic Relativity from Reference to Agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 44:1 ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Perry, Lynn K., Marcus Perlman, Gary Lupyan & Johan J Bolhuis
2015. Iconicity in English and Spanish and Its Relation to Lexical Category and Age of Acquisition. PLOS ONE 10:9 ► pp. e0137147 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.