Cover not available
Article published In:
Circulating Signs and People: Politics, affect, ethnography
Edited by Daniel N. Silva
[Pragmatics and Society 6:2] 2015
► pp. 161–174

Introduction

The pragmatics of discourse circulation

| University of Rio de Janeiro
Published online: 24 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.6.2.01sil
References (45)
Agha, Asif. 2011. “Meet Mediatization.” Language & Communication 311: 163–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andor, József. 2004. “The Master and His Performance: An Interview with Noam Chomsky.” Intercultural Pragmatics 11: 93–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John. 1975. How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Charles Briggs. 1990. “Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 59–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Voices of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1944. “Secondary and Tertiary Responses to Language.” Language 201: 45–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borutti, Silvana. 1984. “Pragmatics and its Discontents.” Journal of Pragmatics 81: 437–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles. 2007. “Anthropology, interviewing, and communicability in contemporary social life.” Current Anthropology 48 (4): 551–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Communicating Biosecurity.” Medical Anthropology 30 (1): 6–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1959. “A Review of B. F. Skinner’s ‘Verbal Behavior.’” Language 35 (1): 26–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cicourel, Aaron. 1987. “On John R. Searle’s ‘Intentionality.’” Journal of Pragmatics 111: 641–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo. 2003. Interpretation and Understanding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1977. “Signature Event Context.” Glyph 11: 172–197.Google Scholar
. 1997. Of Grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Writing and Difference. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1981. “The Order of Discourse.” In Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader, ed. by Robert Young, 48–78. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freire, Paulo. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, William. 1996. “Language form and Communicative Practices.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity, ed. by John Gumperz and Stephen Levinson, 232–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haviland, John. 1997. “Shouts, Shrieks, and Shots: Unruly Political Conversations in Indigenous Chiapas.” Pragmatics 7 (4): 547–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith. 1989. “When Talk Isn’t Cheap: Language and Political Economy.” American Ethnologist 16 (2): 248–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kasher, Asa. 1991. “Pragmatics and Chomsky’s Research Program.” In The Chomskyan Turn, ed. by Asa Kasher, 122–149. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lahud, Michel. 1977. “Alguns mistérios da Linguística.” Almanaque 51: 28–37.Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L., and Mary Talbot. 1988. “Computation and the Soul.” Journal of Pragmatics 121: 743–789. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. (Second ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle. 1982. “The Things We Do with Words: Ilongot Speech Acts and Speech Act Theory in Philosophy.” Language in Society 11 (2): 203–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand. 1998 [1916]. Course in General Linguistics. New York: Open Court.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael, and Greg Urban (eds). 1996. Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. “Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description.” In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Keith Basso and Henry Selby, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. “Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function.” In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. by John Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1979. “Language Structures and Language Ideology.” In The Elements: A Parasession of Linguistic Units and Levels, ed. by Paul R. Clyne, William Hanks, and Carol Hofbauer, 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 
Cambrigde, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 2012. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1958. The Blue and Brown Books. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar