Collateral damage
An investigation of non-combatant teasing by American service personnel in occupied Iraq and Afghanistan
This investigation examines ‘teasing’ of non-combatant children by US military service personnel in occupied Iraq and Afghanistan. The majority of existent investigations of teasing and related practices place significant conceptual importance on the intentions of the teaser – such that a target can understand that the tease is not true. However, in data examined here it appears that targets (children) do not understand the language in which the teasing is undertaken. Drawing from publicly available video footage posted on the video sharing website Liveleak, we provide an ethnomethodological (e.g., Garfinkel 1967) and conversation analytic informed (e.g., Sacks, Schegloff and Jefferson 1974; Schegloff 2007) examination of how persons initiating teasing (soldiers) strategically exploit asymmetries in the sequential and preferential organization of interactions when tease recipients (children) do not have sufficient English skills to redress (or understand) the negative assessments being made of them. Three types of candidate teasing practices are identified: soldier initiated negative other-assessments; target parroting negative other-assessments; and offer-withdrawal games. Analysis examines how such interactions effectively fail as teases and explores how children can resist soldiers’ pursuit of degrading responses.
References (43)
Abrahams, Roger D. 1962. “Playing the Dozens.” Journal of American Folklore751: 209–220.
Bandura, Albert. 1999. “Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities.” Personality and Social Psychology Review31: 193–209.
Billig, Michael. 1999. “WhoseTerms? Whose Ordinariness? Rhetoric and Ideology in Conversation Analysis.” Discourse and Society10 (4): 543–558.
Bowman, Shane, and Chris Willis. 2003. “We Media: How Audiences are Shaping the Future of News and Information.” The Media Center at the American Press Institute.
Christensen, Christian. 2008. “Uploading Dissonance: YouTube and the US Occupation of Iraq.” Media, War & Conflict1 (2): 155–175.
Drew, Paul. 1998. “Complaints About Transgressions and Misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction31 (3&4): 295–325.
Eisenberg, Ann R. 1986. “Teasing: Verbal Play in Two Mexicano Homes.” InLanguage Socialization Across Cultures: Studies in the Social Cultural Foundations of Language, ed. byBambi B. Schieffelin and Elinor Ochs, 182–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fiske, Susan T., and Lasana T. Harris. 2004. “Why Ordinary People Torture Enemy Prisoners.” Science3061: 1482–1483.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1956. “Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies.” The American Journal of Sociology61 (5): 420–424.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Goodwin, Charles. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
Goodwin, Charles. 1994. “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist96 (3): 606–633.
Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1990. He-Said-She-Said. Talk as Social Organization Among Black Children. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Goodwin, Marjorie H. 2006. The Hidden Life of Girls: Games of Stance, Status, and Exclusion. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Hansen, Susan, and Don Bysouth. 2008. “‘Now Calm Down Ma’am’: A Preliminary Investigation of Police-Citizen Interactions that Achieve ‘Conflict Resolution’ through Force, or Threats of Force.” Paper presented at the
Economic and Social Research Council Symposium Conflict Resolution and Mediation in Talk-in-Interaction
, Newcastle University, UK.
Hansen, Susan, and Don Bysouth. 2009a. “‘Whaddaya Pulling Me Over for?’ A Preliminary Analysis of the Institutional Trajectory of a Police Traffic Stop.” Paper presented at the
104th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association
, San Francisco, USA.
Hansen, Susan, and Don Bysouth. 2009b. ‘Step Out of the Car, Ma’am.’: On Some Features of Routine Traffic Stops.”Paper presented at the
11th International Pragmatics Association Conference
, Melbourne, Australia.
Heritage, John. 2002. “The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content.” Journal of Pragmatics341: 1427–1446.
Hills, Sarah, and Tom Phillips. 2006, November 22. “US Troops in Sick Taunt of Boys.”Metro.co.uk. Retrieved from: [URL]
Kamber, Michael, and Tim Arango. 2008, July26. “4,000 U.S. Deaths, and a Handful of Images.” The New York Times.Retrieved from: [URL]
Keltner, Dacher, Lisa Capps, Ann M. Kring, Randall C. Young, and Erin A. Heerey. 2001. “Just Teasing: A Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Review.” Psychological Bulletin127 (2): 229–248.
Laurier, Eric, and Chris Philo. 2006. “Natural Problems of Naturalistic Video Data.” InVideo-Analysis. Methodology and Methods. Qualitative Audiovisual Data in Sociology, ed. byHubert Knoblauch, Jürgen Raab, Hans-Georg Soeffner, and Bernt Schnettler, 181–190. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Lynch, Michael. 2002. “From Naturally Occuring Data to Naturally Organized Ordinary Activities: Comment on Speer.” Discourse Studies4 (4): 531–537.
Lytra, Vally. 2007. “Teasing in Contact Encounters: Frames, Participant Positions and Responses.” Multilingua261: 381–408.
Miller, Peggy. 1986. “Teasing as Language Socialization and Verbal Play in a White Working-Class Community.” InLanguage Socialization Across Cultures: Studies in the Social Cultural Foundations of Language, ed. byBambi B. Schieffelin and Elinor Ochs, 199–212.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mondada, Lorenza. 2009. “Video Recording Practices and the Reflexive Constitution of the Interactional Order: Some Systematic Uses of the Split-Screen Technique.” Human Studies32 (1): 67–99.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984a. “Agreeing and Disagreeing With Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJohn M. Atkinson and John C. Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984b. “Pursuing a Response.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. byJohn M. Atkinson and John C. Heritage, 152–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review681: 939–967.
Reddy, Vasudevi. 1991. “Playing with Others’ Expectations: Teasing and Mucking About in the First Year.” InNatural Theories of Mind: Evolution, Development, and Simulation of Everyday Mindreading, ed. byAndy Whiten, 143–158. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language501: 696–735.
Sacks, Harvey. 1978. “Some Technical Considerations of a Dirty Joke.” InStudies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, ed. byJim Schenkein, 249–270. New York: Academic Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1997. “Whose text? Whose context?” Discourse and Society8 (2): 165–187.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis (Vol. 11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language531: 361–382.
Schieffelin, Bambi B. 1986. “Teasing and Shaming in Kaluli Children’s Interactions.” InLanguage Socialization Across Cultures: Studies in the Social Cultural Foundations of Language, ed. byBambi B. Schieffelin and Elinor Ochs, 165–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sharrock, Wes, and Graham Button. 1991. “The Social Actor: Social Action in Real Time.” InEthnomethodology and the Human Sciences, ed. byGraham Button, 137–175. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stokoe, Elizabeth, and Derek Edwards. 2008. “‘Did you have Permission to Smash your Neighbour’s Door?’ Silly Questions and their Answers in Police Suspect Interrogations.” Discourse Studies10 (1): 89–111.
van Zoonen, Liesbet, Fadi Hirzalla, and Floris Müller. 2009. “Fitna: The Video Battle.” Paper presented at the
Etmaal voor Communicatiewetenschap
, Nijmegen, Netherlands, January 2009. Retrieved from: [URL]
Zimbardo, Philip. 2007. The Lucifer Effect: How Good People Turn Evil. London: Ridder.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Kronrod, Ann & Yakov Bart
2018.
Taking a Leaf Out of a Review: The Asymmetrical Link Between Linguistic Similarity and Attitude Certainty for Writers and Readers of Product Reviews.
SSRN Electronic Journal
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.