Cover not available
Article published In:
(Co-)Constructing Interpersonally Sensitive Activities Across Institutional Settings
Edited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen and Rosina Márquez Reiter
[Pragmatics and Society 7:4] 2016
► pp. 570–594

Evading and resisting answering

An analysis of Mexican Spanish news interviews

| Centre for Research and Advanced Studies in Social Anthropology (CIESAS)
This investigation is a conversation-analytic study of Mexican Spanish news interviews. It focuses on the question-answer adjacency pair in which interviewees (IE) are questioned, directly or indirectly, by the interviewers (IR) about the legality of their wealth in light of corruption allegations. The questions examined display strategies to generate news: content questions elicit a contrast; statement formulated questions followed by a request for confirmation give the opportunity to accept or deny the allegations, in contrast to statements which create a confrontational context. Non-type-conforming answers evade answering and type-conforming answers contain resistance elements. The IE minimize the allegations by repairing and providing a downgraded version, or use other resources to suggest that their activities are of common order, hence not newsworthy. The IE display evasion by addressing only certain elements of the question and counter the allegations by casting doubt on the professionalism of the IR.
Keywords: news interviews, answers, Mexican Spanish, evasion, questions
Published online: 20 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.4.03car
References (26)
Atkinson, John, and Paul Drew. 1979. Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation). 2011. Mexican Poll Contender Peña Nieto Falters at Book Event. 6 December 2011. [online] Accessed on 30 August 2016 from [URL]
Bull, Peter. 1994. “On Identifying Questions, Replies, and Non-replies in Political Interviews.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13 (2): 115–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Kate Mayer. 1993. “How Not to Answer Questions in Political Interviews”. Political Psychology 14 (4): 651–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 1988. “Displaying Neutrality in Television News Interviews.” Social Problems 35 (4): 474–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. “Footing in the Achievement of Neutrality: The Case of News Interview Discourse.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 163–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Answers and Evasions.” Language and Society 30 (3): 403–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage. 2002. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clementson, David E. 2015. “Why Do We Think Politicians Are So Evasive? Insight From Theories of Equivocation and Deception, with a Content Analysis of U.S. Presidential Debates, 1996–2012.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 35 (3): 247–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage. 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garibay Kintana, Ángel M. 1964. La Literatura de los Aztecas. Mexico, DF: Joaquín Mortiz.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie H. Goodwin. 1987. “Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments.” IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1 (1): 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 1991. “Evasive Action: How Politicians Respond to Questions in Political Interviews.” In Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, 76–99. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2012. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1990. “List Construction as a Task and Resource.” In Interaction Competence, ed. by George Psathas, 63–93. Lanham, Md.: University Press of America.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Glossary of Transcription Conventions.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 14–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paz, Octavio. 1989 [1950]. El Laberinto de la Soledad [The Labyrinth of Solitude]. Mexico, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Actions, ed. by John M. Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 681: 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1987. “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button and John R.E. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1979. “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. A. 1996. “Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-interaction: A Partial Sketch of Systematic.” In Studies in Anaphora, ed. by Barbara A. Fox, 437–485. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Sequence Organisation in Interaction: A Prime in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vázquez Carranza, Ariel. 2013. “Responding and Clarifying: An Analysis of pues as a Sequential Marker in Mexican Spanish Talk-in-interactions.” Spanish in Context 10 (2): 284–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Sequential Markers in Mexican Spanish Talk: A Conversation Analytic Study. PhD Thesis. University of Essex.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Alroumi, Abdulrahman & El Mustapha Lahlali
2023. The role of assessments in providing evasive answers in news interviews. Pragmatics and Society 14:6 ► pp. 883 ff. DOI logo
Zainal Abidin, Najah, Veronica Lowe & Jariah Mohd Jan
2023. Evasion in Malaysian Parliamentary Question Time. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 31:3 ► pp. 1057 ff. DOI logo
Alroumi, Abdulrahman
2022. Assessments and actions: Instances from Arabic broadcast political interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 191 ► pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Alroumi, Abdulrahman
2023. ‘We are not putschists’: Accountability and the negotiation of membership categories in political news interviews. Discourse, Context & Media 56 ► pp. 100743 ff. DOI logo
Janusz, Bernadetta, Jörg R. Bergmann, Feliks Matusiak & Anssi Peräkylä
2021. Practices of Claiming Control and Independence in Couple Therapy With Narcissism. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.