Article published In:
(Co-)Constructing Interpersonally Sensitive Activities Across Institutional Settings
Edited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen and Rosina Márquez Reiter
[Pragmatics and Society 7:4] 2016
► pp. 618637
Auer, Peter
2002 “Projection in Conversation and Projection in Grammar.” InLiSt 331, [URL].Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome
1983Child’s Talk: Learning to Use Language. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E
1993 “Reformulating the Question: A Device for Answering/Not Answering Questions in News Interviews and Press Conferences.” Text 131: 159–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys
2010 “Reference as an Interactively and Multimodally Accomplished Practice: Organizing Spatial Reorientation in Guided Tours.” In Spoken Communication, ed. by Massimo Pettorino, Antonella Giannini, Isabella Chiari, and Francesca Dovetto, 137–170. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys, and Lorenza Mondada
2007 “L’organizzazione multimodale e interazionale dell’orientamento spaziale in movimento.” Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée 851: 131–159.Google Scholar
Gardner, Rod
2004 “On Delaying the Answer: Question Sequences Extended after the Question.” In Second Language Conversations, ed. by Rod Gardner and Johannes Wagner, 246–267. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Glenn, Phillip, and Elizabeth Holt
2014 “Introduction.” In Studies of Laughter in Interaction, ed. by Phillip Glenn and Elizabeth Holt, 1–22. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1967Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Haakana, Markku
2001 “Laughter as a Patient’s Resource: Dealing with Delicate Aspects of Medical Interaction.” Text 211: 187–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
2002 “The Limits of Questioning: Negative Interrogatives and Hostile Question Content.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1427–1446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and David Greatbatch
1991 “On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interview Interaction.” In Talk and Social Structure, ed. by Deirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, 93–137. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke
1995 “Meeting Both Ends: Between Standardization and Recipient Design in Telephone Survey Interviews.” In Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities, ed. by Paul ten Have and George Psathas, 91–106. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis, and University Press of America.Google Scholar
Koshik, Irene
Mehan, Hugh
1979Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2005 “La constitution de l’origo déictique comme travail interactionnel des participants: une approche praxéologique de la spatialité.Intellectica 41–421 : 75–100.Google Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi
2007 “Conversation Analysis. ” In Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, ed. by George Ritzer, 791–794. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974“A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 501: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
2007Sequence Organization. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seedhouse, Paul
2004The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack, and Tanya Stivers
(eds) 2012Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen
1995 “On Projection.” In Interaction and Social Intelligence, ed. by Esther Goody, 84–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traverso, Véronique
2008 “Cadres, espaces, objets et multimodalité dans l’interaction en site commercial.” In Les interactions en site commercial: Invariants et variations, ed. by Cathérine Kerbrat-Orecchioni and Véronique Traverso, 45–77. Lyon: ENS Editions.Google Scholar
2012 “’Le salon bibliothèque’: délimitation et partage des espaces. Usage des annonces dénominatives désignatives dans la visite guidée.” In Les visites guidées. Discours, interaction, multimodalité, ed. by Jean-Paul Dufiet, 56–84. Trento: Collezione Labirinti.Google Scholar
2014a “Compétences montrées, compétences partagées, compétences situées: nomination et définition des objets dans les visites guidées.” In De compétences en performances, ed. by Sandra Bornand and Cécile Leguy, 137–163. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
2014b“La construction de (l’attention visuelle sur) l’objet au cours de la visite guidée: étude d’un cas limite.” In L’objet d’art et de culture à la lumière de ses médiations, ed. by Jean-Paul Dufiet, 43–85. Trento: Collezione Labirinti.Google Scholar
vom Lehn, Dirk, Christian Heath, and Jon Hindmarsh
2001 “Exhibiting Interaction: Conduct and Collaboration in Museums and Galleries.” Symbolic Interaction 24 (2): 189–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar