Cover not available
Review published In:
Corpus Approaches to Language, Thought and Communication
Edited by Wei-lun Lu, Naděžda Kudrnáčová and Laura A. Janda
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 17:1] 2019
► pp. 295–301
Book review

R. W. Gibbs, Jr. Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life

Reviewed by
| English Department, School of Foreign Languages, Ocean Universty of China
| English Department, School of Foreign Languages, Ocean Universty of China
| English Department, School of Foreign Languages, Ocean Universty of China
Published online: 20 August 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00036.yan
References
El Refaie, E.
(2013) Cross-modal resonances in creative multimodal metaphors. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 11(2), 236–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E.
(2009) Introduction. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 3–17). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr.
(2008) Metaphor and thought: The state of the art. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 3–13). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A.
(2011) Metaphor as resource for the conceptualisation and expression of emotion. In K. Ahmad (Ed.), Affective computing and sentiment analysis: Emotion, metaphor and terminology (pp. 19–32). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2000) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(2008) The neural theory of metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steen, G.
(2011) Metaphor, language and discourse processes. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 585–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar