Review published In:
Review of Cognitive LinguisticsVol. 18:1 (2020) ► pp.275–281
Book review
N. I. Stolova (2015). Cognitive Linguistics and lexical change. Motion verbs from Latin to Romance
Reviewed by
References (19)
Blank, A. (2003). Words and concepts in time: Towards diachronic cognitive onomasiology. In R. Eckardt, K. von Heusinger & Ch. Schwarze (Eds.), Words in time: Diachronic semantics from different points of view (pp. 37–65). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 
Iacobini, C. (2012). Grammaticalization and innovation in the encoding of motion events. Folia Linguistica, 461, 359–385.
(2015). Particle-verbs in Romance. In P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (Eds.), Word-formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe (pp. 626–658). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Koch, P. (2000a). Pour une approche cognitive du changement sémantique lexical: Aspect onomasiologique. In the Société de Linguistique de Paris (Ed.), Théories contemporaines du changement sémantique (pp. 75–95). Leuven: Peeters.
(2000b). Indirizzi cognitivi per una tipologia lessicale dell’italiano. Italienische Studien, 211, 99–117.
(2004). Diachronic onomasiology and semantic reconstruction. In W. Mihatsch & R. Steinberg (Eds.), Lexical data and universals of semantic change (pp. 79–106). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Koch, P., & Marzo, D. (2007). A two-dimensional approach to the study of motivation in lexical typology and its first application to French high-frequency vocabulary. Studies in Language, 31(2), 259–291.
Kopecka, A. (2006). The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspectives. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Pountain, Ch. J. (2000). Pragmatic factors in the evolution of the Romance reflexive (with special reference to Spanish). Hispanic Research Journal, 1(1), 5–25.
Pourcel, S., & Kopecka, A. (2005). Motion expression in French: Typological diversity. Durham & Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics, 111, 139–153.
Simone, R. (2008). Verbi sintagmatici come categoria e come costruzione. In M. Cini (Ed.), I verbi sintagmatici in italiano e nelle varietà dialettali: Stato dell’arte e prospettive di ricerca. Atti delle giornate di studio (Torino, 19–20 febbraio 2007) (pp. 13–30). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Stefenelli, A. (1992). Das Schicksal des lateinischen Wortschatzes in den romanischen Sprachen. Passau: Richard Rothe.
Stolova, N. I. (2008). From satellite-framed Latin to verb-framed Romance: Late Latin as an intermediate stage. In R. Wright (Ed.), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif VIII: Actes du VIIIe Colloque International sur le Latin Vulgaire et Tardif, Oxford, 6–9 septembre 2006 (pp. 253–262). Hildesheim: Georg Olms; Zürich: Weidmann.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Traugott, E. C. (1985). On regularity in semantic change. Journal of Literary Semantics: An international review, 14(3), 155–173.
Traugott, E. C., & Dascher, R. B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.