The semantic network of temperature
Non-sensory domains accessed with metaphorical extensions of the Italian adjectives caldo and
freddo
The present study investigates the relation between temperature and non-sensory domains conceptually
close to it. Observing metaphorical extensions of the Italian basic temperature terms caldo ‘hot’ and
freddo ‘cold’, individuated through a collocational analysis performed on the ItTenTen16 corpus, mental
operations responsible for the association of temperature with other domains are assessed. Interestingly, many
associations are first elaborated onto warmth/heat and then used to map concepts onto cold. Although conceptual
associations are primarily motivated by embodiment, in some cases they stem from a shared “vertical” image-schematic structure:
warmth and heat are up, while cold is down on the axis, resembling the
configuration of other domains with a positive/negative orientation (e.g., good/bad). A visual representation of the
semantic network of temperature highlights that domains associated with temperature are mirrored in its two
poles: for instance, high and low temperature are associated, respectively, with friendliness and
unfriendliness.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical framework
- 3.The temperature domain
- 4.Data and methodology
- 5.Analysis and results
- 5.1Pleasant is warm and unpleasant is cold
- 5.2Enclosing is warm and not enclosing is cold
- 5.3Lack of self-control is heat and self-control is cold
- 5.4Activity is heat and inactivity is cold
- 6.Conclusions and prospective work
- Notes
-
References
References (71)
References
Agbetsoamedo, Y., & Di Garbo, F. (2015). Unravelling temperature terms in Sɛlɛɛ. In M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (Ed.), Linguistics of temperature (pp. 107–127). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2014). Cross-linguistic view. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), The grammar of knowledge (pp. 1–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ameka, F. K. (2015). “Hard sun, hot weather, skin pain”. In M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (Ed.), Linguistics of temperature (pp. 43–72). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Apresjan, V. (1997). Emotion metaphors and cross-linguistic conceptualization of emotions. Cuadernos de filología inglesa, 6121, 179–195.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clausner, T. C., & Croft, W. (1999). Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics, 10(1), 1–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, W. (1993). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics, 41, 335–370. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cruse, D. A., & Togia, P. (1995). Towards a cognitive model of antonymy. Lexicology, 11, 113–141.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deignan, A., & Potter, L. (2004). A corpus study of metaphors and metonyms in English and Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1231–1252. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Emantian, M. (1995). Metaphor and the expression of emotion: The value of cross-cultural perspectives. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 101, 163–182. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G. (1998). Mental spaces and conceptual integration. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 251–279). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 113–130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fortescue, M. (2001). Thoughts about thought. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(1), 15–45. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fruyt, M. (2013). Temperature and cognition in Latin. Revue de Linguistique Latine du Centre Alfred Ernout. De Lingua Latina, 91, 1–34.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Georgakopoulos, T., & Polis, S. (2018). The semantic map model: State of the art and future avenues for linguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(2), 1–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2007). Idioms and formulaic language. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 697–724). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2007). NSM analyses of the semantics of physical qualities: Sweet, hot, hard, heavy, rough, sharp in cross-linguistic perspective. Studies in Language, 34(1), 675–800. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goossens, L. (1998). Meaning extensions and text type. English Studies, 791, 120–43. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grady, J. E. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Berkeley: University of California PhD Thesis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grady, J. E. (2007). Metaphor. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 188–213). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, Z. (1970). Distributional structure. In Z. Harris (Ed.), Papers in structural and transformational linguistics. Formal linguistics (pp. 775–794). New York: Humanities Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hensel, H. (1981). Thermoreception and temperature regulation. London: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, C. (1997). Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of see
. In M. K. Hiraga, C. Sinha & S. Wilcox (Eds.), Cultural, typological and psychological issues in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 155–169). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, M., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V. (2014). The Sketch Engine: ten years on. Lexicography, 11, 7–36. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Z. (1990). Emotion concepts. New York: Springer-Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Z. (1995). Anger: Its language, conceptualization, and physiology in the light of cross-cultural evidence. In J. R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 181–196). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion. Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Z. (2007). Emotion concepts: From happiness to guilt. A cognitive semantic perspective. Research Gate, January 2007. Available at: <[URL]>. Accessed: 22 March 2020.
Kövecses, Z., Palmer, G. B., & Dirven, R. (2003). Language and emotion: The interplay of conceptualisation with physiology and culture. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 133–159). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., Espenson, J., & Schwartz, A. (1991). The master metaphor list. Technical report, University of California at Berkeley.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lehrer, A. (1970). Static and dynamic elements in semantics: Hot, warm, cool, cold. Papers in Linguistics (Carbondale), 31, 349–373. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lorenzetti, M. I. (2009). “That girl is hot, her dress is so cool, and I’m just chilling out now”: Emergent metaphorical usages of temperature terms in English and Italian. Paper presented at the Corpus-Based Approaches to Figurative Language Colloquium in Liverpool, UK, July 2009.
Montes, M. (2017). Evaluación de la temperatura en el italiano escrito contemporáneo [Evaluation of temperature in written contemporary Italian]. Encuentros, 41, 9–19.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Parrott, W. G. (1995). The heart and the head: Everyday conceptions of being emotional. In J. A. Russell, J.-M. Fernández-Dols, A. S. R. Manstead & J. C. Wellenkamp (Eds.), Everyday conceptions of emotion: An introduction to the psychology, anthropology and linguistics of emotion (pp. 73–84). Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinelli, E. (2017). The conceptualisation of fear in Italian and Russian: Different degrees of lexicalisation of metonymies. In A. Baicchi & E. Pinelli (Eds.), Cognitive modelling in language and discourse across cultures (pp. 283–297). Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plank, F. (2003). Temperature talk: The basics. Paper presented at the Workshop on Lexical Typology at the ALT conference in Cagliari, September 2003.
Plank, F. (2010). Temperature talk: The basics revisited. Talk presented at the Workshop on Temperature in Language and Cognition, Stockholm University, 19–20 March 2010.
Radden, G. (2000). How metonymic are metaphors? In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 93–108). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rohrer, T. (2007). Embodiment and experientialism. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 25–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2019). Understanding figures of speech: Dependency relations and organizational patterns. Language & Communication, 711, 16–38. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sahlgren, M. (2006). The Word-Space Model: Using distributional analysis to represent syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations between words in high-dimensional vector spaces. Stockholm: Stockholm University PhD Thesis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stubbs, M. (1995). Collocations and cultural connotations of common words. Linguistics and Education, 71, 379–390. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sutrop, U. (1998). Basic temperature terms and subjective temperature scale. Lexicology, 41, 60–104.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taylor, J. R. (1995). Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turner, M. (2007). Conceptual integration. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 377–393). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ullmann, S. (1957). The principles of semantics (2nd ed.) Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Violi, P. (2003). Le tematiche del corporeo nella Semantica Cognitiva [Bodily matters in Cognitive Semantics]. In L. Gaeta & S. Luraghi (Eds.), Introduzione alla linguistica cognitiva [Introduction to cognitive linguistics] (pp. 57–76). Roma: Carocci.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wierzbicka, A. (1995). Dictionaries vs. encyclopaedias: How to draw the line. In P. W. Davis (Ed.), Alternative linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical modes (pp. 289–315). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures: Diversity and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhong, C.-B., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 19(9), 838–42. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)