From usage patterns to meaning construction
Evidence from ear and eye figurative constructions
The present study investigates the meaning construction emerging from figurative constructions involving
ear and eye in Modern Greek. The study concerns authentic language data retrieved from a
corpus search. Analysis takes into consideration the embodiment hypothesis, the development of chained metonymies and the
interaction of metaphor and metonymy as the motivation for the usage patterns under investigation. The constructions analyzed
reveal that the sense of vision is prioritized over hearing. Furthermore, constructional parameters of meaning show how
ears and eyes are perceived in MG language and culture. Eye is attributed
the agent role in the constructions, while ear is the entity acted upon. Moreover, eyes are
mainly perceived as reflections of different dimensions of the selfhood, while ears are perceived as containers.
A broader polysemy thus emerges for the eye than for the ear.
Keywords: corpus-based study, usage pattern, construction, ear, eye, metaphor, metonymy, embodiment, polysemy, culture, Greek
Article outline
- 1.Introduction and background
- 1.1Metaphor and metonymy and their interaction in figurative language
- 1.2Experiential basis of metaphor and metonymy and their interaction in figurative language
- 1.2.1Body parts and chained metonymies
- 2.Corpus studies and methodology
- 3.Meaning construction in usage patterns with body part terms
- 3.1Metaphor-metonymy and their interaction in ear usage patterns
- 3.1.1Constructional parameters of meaning in ear usage patterns
- 3.2Metaphor-metonymy and their interaction in eye usage patterns
- 3.2.1Constructional parameters of meaning in eye usage patterns
- 3.3Overall discussion and comparison
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (54)
References
Barcelona, A. (2002). Clarifying
and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics: An
update. In R. Dirven & R. Porings (Eds.), Metaphor
and metonymy in comparison and
contrast (pp. 207–277). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Bergen, B. (2015). Embodiment. In E. Dabrovska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook
of Cognitive
Linguistics (pp. 10–30). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Cienki, A. (2007). Frames,
Idealized Cognitive Models, and Domains. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens. (Eds), The
Oxford handbook of Cognitive
Linguistics (pp. 170–187). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croft, W. (1993). The
role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive
Linguistics,
4
(4), 335–370. 

Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive
Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Deignan, A., & Potter, L. (2004). A
corpus study of metaphors and metonymies in English and Italian. Journal of
Pragmatics,
36
1, 1231–1252. 

Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2005). Embodiment
and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press. 

Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions
at work: The nature of generalization in
language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grady, J. (2007). Metaphor. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds), The
Oxford handbook of Cognitive
Linguistics (pp. 188–213). Oxford University Press.
Granger, S., & Paquot, M. (2008). Disentangling
the phraseological web. In S. Granger, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology:
an interdisciplinary
perspective (pp. 27–49). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 

Hilpert, M. (2006). Keeping
an eye on the data: Metonymies and their pattern. In A. Stefanowitch & S. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based
approaches to metaphor and
metonymy (pp. 123–151). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Johnson, M. (1987). The
body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and
reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 

Kӧvecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor:
A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kraska-Szlenk, I. (2014). Semantic
extension of body part terms: Common patterns and their interpretation. Language
Sciences,
44
1, 15–39. 

Lakoff, G. (1993). The
contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Εd.), Metaphor
and
thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors
we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Littlemore, J., & Taylor, J. (2014). Introduction. In J. Littlemore & J. Taylor (Εds.), The
Bloomsbury companion to Cognitive
Linguistics (pp. 1–26). London: Bloomsbury.
Marmaridou, S. (2006). On
the conceptual, cultural and discursive motivation of Greek pain lexicalizations. Cognitive
Linguistics,
17
(3), 393–434. 

Mel΄čuk, I. (1998). Collocations
and lexical functions. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology:
Theory, analysis and
applications (pp. 23–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Niemeier, S. (2000). Straight
from the heart – metonymic and metaphorical explorations. In A. Barcelona (Εd.), Metaphor
and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive
perspective (pp. 196–213). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Oakley, T. (2007). Image
schemas. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Εds), The
Oxford handbook of Cognitive
Linguistics. (pp. 214–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Panther, K. W., & Thornburg, L. (2007). Metonymy. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Εds), The
Oxford handbook of Cognitive
Linguistics (pp. 236–263). Oxford University Press.
Radden, G. (2002). How
metonymic are metaphors? In R. Dirven & R. Porings (Εds), Metaphor
and Metonymy in Comparison and
Contrast (pp. 407–434). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Rohrer, T. (2007). Embodiment
and experientialism. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds), The
Oxford Handbook of Cognitive
Linguistics. (pp. 25–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2000). The
role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor
and metonymy at the
crossroads (pp. 109–132). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera-Masegosa, A. (2011). Going
beyond metaphtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb
interpretation. Language
Value,
3
(1), 1–29. 

Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Corpus-based
approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In A. Stefanowitch & S. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based
approaches to metaphor and
metonymy (pp. 1–16). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sweetser, E. (1990). From
etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic
structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Θώμου, Π. (2008). Η μεταφορά (metaphor) στην Ονοματική Φράση (ΕΠΙΘΕΤΟ + ΟΥΣΙΑΣΤΙΚΟ). ΑΡΙΑΔΝΗ
14
1, 273–291. [Thomou, P. (2008). Metaphor in the Noun Phrase (ADJECTIVE + NOUN). ARIADNE
14
1, 273–291] (in
Greek).
Θώμου, Π. (2010). Εκδοχές της μεταφοράς (metaphor) σε σχολικά βιβλία και η κατανόησή τους από
μαθητές, Αριάδνη,
16
1, 217–238. [Thomou, P. (2010). Comprehension of options of Metaphor in Schoolbooks. ARIADNE,
16
1, 217–238] (in
Greek).
Thomou, P. (2013). Verbal
collocations in Modern Greek and English: Common
patterns. GLOSSOLOGIA,
21
1, 19–38.
Thomou, P. (2017). Conceptual
and lexical aspects influencing metaphor realization in Modern
Greek. In T. Georgakopoulos, T.-S. Pavlidou, M. Pechlivanos, A. Alexiadou, J. Androutsopoulos, A. Kalokerinos, S. Spopeteas & K. Stathi (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 12th International Conference on Greek
Linguistics (pp. 993–1006). Edition Romiosini/CeMoG, Freie Universitat Berlin. ([URL])
Thomou, P. (2019). Locatives
and their metaphorical conceptualization in multi-word units retrieved from a corpus
search. In M. Chondrogianni, S. Courtenage, G. Horrocks, A. Arvaniti & I. Tsimpli (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 13th International Conference on Greek
Linguistics (pp. 248–255). London: University of Westminster. ([URL])
Thomou, P. (2020). Towards
a constructional account of multi-word units in Modern Greek: a corpus-based
study. In S. Markantonatou & A. Christofidou (Eds.), Multi-word
expressions: Drawing on data from Modern Greek and other
languages (pp. 305–331). Athens: Academy of Athens.
Βελούδης, Γ. (2005). Η σημασία πριν, κατά και μετά τη
γλώσσα. Αθήνα: Κριτική. [Veloudis, G. (2005). Meaning in and beyond
language. Athens: Kritiki] (in
Greek)
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic
language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Xioufis, T. (2017). The
pattern of the metaphor within metonymy in the figurative language of romantic love in Modern
Greek. In T.-S. Pavlidou, M. Pechlivanos, A. Alexiadou, J. Androutsopoulos, A. Kalokerinos, S. Spopeteas & K. Stathi (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 12th International Conference on Greek
Linguistics (pp. 1275–1287) Edition Romiosini/CeMoG, Freie Universitat Berlin.
Yu, N. (2004). The
eyes for sight and mind. Journal of
Pragmatics,
36
1, 663–686. 

Yu, N. (2008). Metaphor
from body and culture. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The
Cambridge handbook of metaphor and
thought (pp. 247–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Christodoulakis, Christos & Paraskevi Thomou
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.