Article published In:
Expressing and Describing Surprise
Edited by Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2] 2015
► pp. 270290
References
Athanasiadou, A., & Tabakowska, E
(Eds.) (1998) Speaking of emotions: Conceptualization and expression. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L
(2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Celle, A., & Lansari, L
(2014) ‘I’m surprised’/’Are you surprised?’: Surprise as an argumentation tool in verbal interaction. In P. Blumenthal, I. Novakova, & D. Siepmann (Eds.), Les émotions dans le discours/Emotions in discourse (pp. 267–279). Bern/Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Damasio, A
(1994) Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Deignan, A
(2005) Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V
(1975) Unmasking the face. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., Levenson, R.W., & Friesen, W.V
(1983) Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes among emotions. Science, 2211, 1208–1210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, J.J.R., Scherer, K.R., & Soriano, C
(Eds.) (2013) Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frijda, N.H
(1986) Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W
(1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world In R.W. Gibbs & G.J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics: Selected papers from the 5th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (pp. 145–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., & Colston, H
(2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, C
(this volume). The complex, language-specific semantics of “surprise”.
Goossens, L
(1990) Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in the expression of linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 323–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Handl, S., & Schmid, H.-J
(Eds.) (2011) Windows to the mind: Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holland, D., & Quinn, N
(Eds.) (1987) Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z
(1986) Metaphors of anger, pride, and love. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990) Emotion concepts. Berlin/New York: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Metaphor and emotion. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Metaphor and emotion. In R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 380–396). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction, 2nd edition. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) Methodological issues in conceptual metaphor theory. In S. Handl & H.-J. Schmid (Eds.), Windows to the mind: Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending (pp. 23–39). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2015) Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z
(1987) The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). Cambridge/ New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R
(1987) Cognitive grammar. Vol. 11. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J
(1996) The emotional brain. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Lutz, C.A
(1988) Unnatural emotions: Everyday sentiments on a Micronesian atoll and their challenge to western theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Manstead, A.S.R., Frijda, N., & Fischer, A
(Eds.) (2004) Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam Symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niemeier, S., & Dirven, R
(Eds.) (1997) The language of emotions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, G., & Occhi, D
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quinn, N
(Ed.) (2005) Finding culture in talk: A collection of methods. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Russel, J.A., Fernández-Dols, J.M., Manstead, A.S.R., & Wellenkamp, J.C
(Eds.) (1995) Everyday conceptions of emotion. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E
(2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soriano, C
(2005) The conceptualization of anger in English and Spanish: A cognitive approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.Google Scholar
Soriano, C., Fontaine, J., & Scherer, K
(this voume). Surprise in the GRID.
Stefanowitsch, A
(2006) Words and their metaphors. In A. Stefanowitsch & S.T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 64–105). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, P
(Ed.) (2012) Dynamicity in emotion concepts. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, N
Cited by

Cited by 36 other publications

Bolognesi, Marianna & Kristina Š. Despot
2019. Fantastic metaphors and where to find them. In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bosman, Nerina & Elsabé Taljard
2021. A Cross-Linguistic Study of BLOOD Metaphors in Afrikaans and Northern Sotho. Language Matters 52:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Lang & Guangwei Hu
2020. Mediating Knowledge through Expressing Surprises: A Frame-based Analysis of Surprise Markers in Research Articles across Disciplines and Research Paradigms. Discourse Processes 57:8  pp. 659 ff. DOI logo
Cifuentes Honrubia, José Luis
2023. (No) faltaba/faltaría más. In Verb and Context [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 34],  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Csillag, Andrea
2023. Metaphorical Meanings of Some Prepositions in English Expressions of Sadness. Romanian Journal of English Studies 20:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hu, Guangwei & Lang Chen
2019. “To our great surprise …”: A frame-based analysis of surprise markers in research articles. Journal of Pragmatics 143  pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Julich-Warpakowski, Nina & Paula Pérez-Sobrino
2023.  M. Bolognesi, M. Brdar, & K. Despot (eds.) (2019). Metaphor and metonymy in the digital age. Theory and methods for building repositories of figurative language. John Benjamins (Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8).. Language and Cognition 15:3  pp. 622 ff. DOI logo
Kövecses, Zoltán
2017. Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 28:2  pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
Kövecses, Zoltán
2019. Chapter 16. Perception and metaphor. In Perception Metaphors [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 19],  pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Kövecses, Zoltán
2020. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory, DOI logo
Kövecses, Zoltán
2020. A multi-level view of metaphor and some of its advantages. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9],  pp. 72 ff. DOI logo
Kövecses, Zoltán, Laura Ambrus, Dániel Hegedűs, Ren Imai & Anna Sobczak
Kövecses, Zoltán, Réka Benczes, Anna Rommel & Veronika Szelid
2024. Universality versus variation in the conceptualization of anger: A question of methodology. Russian Journal of Linguistics 28:1  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Lemghari, El Mustapha
2019. A metaphor-based account of semantic relations among proverbs. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1  pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Lemghari, El Mustapha
2022. On the Role of Source and Target Words’ Meanings in Metaphorical Conceptualizations. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 67:1  pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Li, Jinyan & Zi Ouyang
2023. Review of Yu (2022): Moral Metaphor System: A Conceptual Metaphor Approach. Journal of Language and Politics 22:6  pp. 952 ff. DOI logo
Menete, Sérgio N. & Guiying Jiang
2024. The semantics of the polysemic Amharic word fit ‘face’. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Menete, Sérgio N. & Guiying Jiang
2024. Another member out of the family: the description of manner of gait in Changana verbs of motion. Folia Linguistica 0:0 DOI logo
Piata, Anna
2020. Stylistic humor across modalities. Internet Pragmatics 3:2  pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Piata, Anna
2022. Stylistic humor across modalities. In The Pragmatics of Internet Memes [Benjamins Current Topics, 120],  pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Shea, Jordan Edward, Cecilia Ovesdotter Alm & Reynold Bailey
2018. 2018 IEEE Western New York Image and Signal Processing Workshop (WNYISPW),  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Soriano, Cristina & Javier Valenzuela
2022. The size of shame and pride. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1  pp. 210 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Qian & Guangwei Hu
2022. What surprises, interests and confuses researchers? A frame-based analysis of knowledge emotion markers in research articles. Lingua 279  pp. 103426 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Ning
2020. Linguistic embodiment in linguistic experience. In Body Part Terms in Conceptualization and Language Usage [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 12],  pp. 12 ff. DOI logo
Yu, Ning & Jie Huang
2019. Primary Metaphors across Languages: Difficulty as Weight and Solidity. Metaphor and Symbol 34:2  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. The Abstract Understood Figuratively, the Concrete Understood Literally, but the Concrete Understood Figuratively?. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,  pp. 22 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Conceptual or Contextual?. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,  pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. References. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,  pp. 186 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. A Brief Outline of “Standard” Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Some Outstanding Issues. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Direct or Indirect Emergence?. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,  pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Offline or Online?. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,  pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Index. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,  pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Domains, Schemas, Frames, or Spaces?. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,  pp. 50 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. The Shape of the Extended View of CMT. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,  pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. By Way of Conclusion: Responses to the Five Questions. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,  pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Preface. In Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,  pp. xi ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.