Review published In:
Expressing and Describing Surprise
Edited by Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:2] 2015
► pp. 507514
Butler, C.
(2006) On functionalism and formalism: A reply to Newmeyer. Functions of Language, 13(2), 197–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
(2000) Why can’t we talk to each other? Review of Newmeyer (1998) Lingua, 110(4), 235–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1991) Cognitive versus generative linguistics: How commitments influence results. Language & Communication, 11(1–2), 53–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J.
(1991) Functional explanation in linguistics and the origins of language. Language & Communication, 11(1–2), 3–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998) Language form and language function. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J.
(2005) Brothers in arms? On the relations between functional and cognitive linguistics. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáňez & M. S. Peňa Carvel (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 69–100). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2007) Cognitive linguistics and functional linguistics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 543–565). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) Pattern versus process concepts of grammar and mind. In M. Brdar, S. T. Gries, & M. Žic Fuchs (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp. 47–66). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. A.
(1991) On addressing functional explanation in linguistics. Language & Communication, 11(1–2): 93–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar