Van den vos Reynaerde
A social discourse through a satiric looking-glass
Van den vos Reynaerde is interpreted as the satiric textualization of a particular social discourse. In the first part, the objectives are the three estates: clergy, nobility and peasants. The second part is focussed on the dysfunction of authority, its lack of moral and social legitimation and the relation individual-authority. The medieval society is criticized in a goliardic-inspired manner, where the satiric subject reflects through inversion the satiric objective. It is pointed out that the text contains a parody on the biblical story of Judith and Holofernes, to discern whether opposing a repressive authority allows for ‘just war’. The results of this study challenge the conventional interpretations of Van den vos Reynaerde based on an Arthurian courtly context. The author’s profile and intended public are reviewed with respect to these conclusions.
Article outline
- A goliardic-inspired satire
- Prologue (1–40)
- King Nobel holds court (41–496)
- The charges against Reynaert
- King Nobel concludes
- The three summons (497–1752)
- The misadventure of Bruun
- The misadventure of Tybeert
- The public confession of Reynaert to Grimbeert
- Reynaert acts as a goliard
- Conviction and evasion (1753–2795)
- Reynaerts conviction
- The ruse of Reynaert
- Nobel’s incompetence and failing legitimation as authority
- Perversion reveals perversion (2796–3389)
- Reynaert as a pilgrim
- The satiric subject: The decapitation of Cuwaert and Belin’s letter
- The goliardic inspiration: Perversion to reveal perversion
- The satiric object: The parody on the story of Judith and Holofernes
- The epilogue (3390–469)
- A satirical social discourse
- Images of medieval estates
- King Nobel and the members of his court
- The peasants and the clergy
- Images of medieval authority
- The failing legitimation of authority
- The moral decapitation of authority. Does the end justify the means?
- The epilogue: Institutionalisation of the power of authority
- The profiles of the audience and the author
- The audience and the new courtliness
- The author
- Conclusions
- Notes