Book review
F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & A. Galera Masegosa. Cognitive modeling: A linguistic perspective [Human Cognitive Processing Series (HCP), Cognitive Foundations of Language Structure and Use, 45]. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014. ISBN 9789027223999 viii + 250 pp.
References (15)
References
Colston, H. L., & O’Brien, J. (2000). Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics, 321, 1557–1583. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1998). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 641, 501–538. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E. (2002). Surface generalizations: An alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(4), 327–356. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalizations in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Horn, L. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. PhD dissertation, distributed by IUCL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Israel, M. (2011). The grammar of polarity: Pragmatics, sensitivity, and the logic of scales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 109–132). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2007). High-level cognitive models: In search of a unified framework for inferential and grammatical behaviour. In K. Kosecki (ed.), Perspectives on metonymy (pp. 11–30). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2011). Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza (eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 103–123). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Mairal Usón, R. (2008). Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: An introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model. Folia Linguistica, 42(2), 355–400.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Iza Erviti, Aneider
2021.
From Discourse Markers to Construction Grammar(s) in Discourse. In
Discourse Constructions in English [
Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, ],
► pp. 7 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Iza Erviti, Aneider
2021.
Introduction. In
Discourse Constructions in English [
Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, ],
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.