Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 28, Lisbon
Edited by Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo and Sandra Pereira
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10] 2016
► pp. 43–60

Explicative clauses in Portuguese as a case of parentheses

| Universidade de Lisboa
ORCID logo | Universidade de Lisboa
A subset of causal explicative clauses in European Portuguese (EP) introduced by the connectors pois ‘for’, que ‘that’ and porque ‘because’ has been classified either as coordinate or subordinate clauses, or alternatively as autonomous discursive expressions. Extending previous work, we claim that, although the sentences they head present most of the characteristics of subordination, they establish with the host sentence a paratactic link, and involve secondary and non-restrictive information. We will argue that these explicative clauses arise from parenthetical inclusion via Par-Merge, in the sense of De Vries (2012). This analysis allows us to provide a syntactic account for these clauses, and to capture some of their correlated discursive properties.
Keywords: Causal explicative clauses, parataxis, parenthetical clauses, Parenthetical Merge, subordination
Published online: 8 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.10.03col
References (35)
References
Bechara, Evanildo. 1999. Moderna Gramática Portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Lucerna.Google Scholar
Bello, Andrés. 1847. Gramática de la lengua castellana. Tenerife: Aula de Cultura, 1981.Google Scholar
Colaço, Madalena and Gabriela Matos. 2015. “A natureza paratática das causais explicativas em português”. In XXXI Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística. Textos Selecionados, ed.by António Moreno, Fátima Silva and João Veloso, 175–193. Porto: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística.Google Scholar
Cunha, Celso and Luís-Filipe Cintra. 1984. Nova Gramática do Português Contemporâneo. Lisboa: Edições João Sá da Costa.Google Scholar
Déhé, Nicole and Yordanka Kavalova. 2007. “Parentheticals: An Introduction”. In Parentheticals, ed. by Nicole Déhé and Yordanka Kavalova, 1–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner. 2012. “On two types of adverbial clauses allowing root-phenomena”. In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons, ed. by Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman and Rachel Nye, 405–429. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner and Hubert Truckenbrodt. 2015. “Syntactic and prosodic integration and disintegration in peripheral adverbial clauses and in right dislocation/afterthought”. In Syntactic Complexity across Interfaces, ed. by Andreas Trotzke and Josef Bayer, 75–106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Frota, Sónia. 2000. Prosody and Focus in European Portuguese. Phonological Phrasing and Intonation. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Galán Rodriguez, Carmen. 1999. “La subordinación causal y final”. In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte, 3597–3642. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 1991. “Frasiavverbialli: temporalli, causali e consecutive”. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, ed. by Lorenzo Renzi and Giampaolo Salvi, 2.2, 738–751. Bologna: Il Molino.Google Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice. 1993. Le Bon Usage- Grammaire française. Refondued par André Goosse, 13th edition revised. Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar
Griffiths, James. 2015. On appositives. PhD Dissertation, University of Groningen. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series, no.389.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. “Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach”. In Aspects of Modern English: Papers Presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday , ed. by Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Yamada, Osamu Koma and Takao Yagi, 232–254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.
Huddleston, Rodney, John Payne and Peter Peterson. 2002. “Coordination and Supplementation”. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, ed. by Rodney Huddleston, and Geoffrey Pullum, 1273–1351. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kluck, Marlies. 2015. “On representing anchored parentheses in syntax”. In Syntactic Complexity across Interfaces, ed. by Andreas Trotzke and Josef Bayer, 107–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan. 2000. Extraposition as Parallel Construal. University of Groningen. [URL].Google Scholar
Lobo, Maria. 2003. Aspectos da Sintaxe das orações subordinadas adverbiais do Português. PhD Thesis. Lisboa: Universidade Nova de Lisboa.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Subordinação adverbial”. In Gramática do Português, ed. by Eduardo Raposo, M. Fernanda Nascimento, M. Antónia Mota, Luísa Segura and Amália Mendes, vol II, 1979–2057. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Google Scholar
Lopes, Helena. 2004. Aspectos Sintácticos, Semânticos e Pragmáticos das Construções Causais – Contributo para uma Reflexão sobre o Ensino da Gramática. PhD Thesis, Porto: Universidade do Porto.Google Scholar
Macário Lopes, Ana Cristina. 2012. “Contributos para uma análise Semântico-pragmática das causais de enunciação no português europeu contemporâneo”. Alfa, São Paulo, 56 (2): 451–468.Google Scholar
Matos, Gabriela. 2003. “Estruturas de Coordenação”. In Gramática da Língua Portuguesa, ed. by M.Helena Mateus, Ana Brito, Inês Duarte, Isabel Faria, Sónia Frota, Gabriela Matos, Fátima Oliveira, Marina Vigário and Alina Villalva, 229–259. Lisboa: Editorial Caminho.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Coordenação Frásica vs. Subordinação Adverbial”. In Actas do XIX Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, ed. by Tiago Freitas and Amália Mendes, 555–567. Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística.Google Scholar
Matos, Gabriela and Madalena Colaço. 2010. “A coordenação parentética como uma instância de adjunção”. Textos Seleccionados do XXV Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, 2009, 607–622. Porto: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística.Google Scholar
Matos, Gabriela and Eduardo Raposo. 2013. “Estruturas de coordenação”. In Gramática do português, ed. by Eduardo Raposo, M. Fernanda Nascimento, M. Antónia Mota, Luísa Segura and Amália Mendes, vol. II, 1761–1817. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Google Scholar
Peres, João and Salvador Mascarenhas. 2006. “Notes on sentential connections (predominantly) in Portuguese”. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 5 (1): 113–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piot, Mireille. 1988. “ Coordination-subordination: une définition générale ”. Langue Française, 77: 3–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffry Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Real Academía Española.1931. Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
. 1973. Esbozo de una nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Said Ali, Manuel. 1931. Gramática Histórica da língua Portuguesa. São Paulo: Edições Melhoramentos, 1964.Google Scholar
Santos Río, Luis. 1982. “Reflexiones sobre la expresión de la causa en castellano”. Studia Philologia Salmanticensia, 6: 231–277.Google Scholar
de Vries, Mark. 2006. “The Syntax of Appositive Relativization: On Specifying Coordination, False Free Relatives and Promotion”. Linguistic Inquiry 37 (2): 229–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Parentheses as B-merged adverbial phrases”. In Parentheticals, ed. by Nicole Déhé and Yordanka Kavalova, 203–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Specifying Coordination: An Investigation into the Syntax of Dislocation, Extraposition and Parenthesis”. In Language and Linguistics: Emerging Trends, ed. by Cynthia R. Dreyer, 37–98, New York: Nova.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Unconventional Mergers”. In Ways of Structure Building, ed. by Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria and Vidal Valmala, 143–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar