Can the well-known verb-framed/satellite-framed variation observed by Talmy (1975 et seq.) be productively analyzed as a true parameter, or is it in fact something else, perhaps a morphological tendency of individual lexical items in a given language? Here we defend the view that it is indeed a parameter, of a well-understood type: a head-movement parameter. We claim that it results from the variety of uninterpretable feature that is bundled with the flavor of v which is used in change-of-state constructions. The technical apparatus employed is another instance of a typical head-movement parameter, of the kind that accounts for the familiar V-to-T or T-to-C parameters. In verb-framed languages, head-movement to change-of-state v0 is mandatory, just as head-movement to finite T0 is mandatory in V-to-T languages. The approach, in contrast to previous analyses, does not ascribe a deficiency to verb-framed languages, either in their semantic composition inventory, or their inventory of structural operations, both of which seem prima facie implausible from a biolinguistic/Minimalist perspective.
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor. 2010. Argument structure and the syntax-morphology interface. A case study in Latin and other languages. PhD. thesis, Universitat de Barcelona.
Alexiadou, Artemis, and Elena Anagnostopoulou. 2011. “Decomposing the Greek Verb”. Talk presented at
Approaches to the lexicon: Roots III
, June 16, 2011, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Asyllogistou, Athanasia. 2015. “Result in prefixed verbs in the diachrony of Greek. Evidence from Homeric and Classical Greek”, Handout from The diachrony of Satellite and Verb framed languages
, Ulster University workshop, October 16th 2015.
Beavers, John, and Andrew Koontz-Garboden. 2012. “Manner and result in the roots of verbal meaning”. Linguistic Inquiry 43 (3): 331–369.
Beavers, John, Beth Levin, and Shiao Wei Tham. 2010. “The typology of motion expressions revisited.” Journal of Linguistics 46: 331–377.
Beck, Sigrid, and William Snyder. 2001. “Complex predicates and goal PP's: Evidence for a semantic parameter.” In Proceedings of the 25th Boston University Conference on Language Development, ed. by Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Dominguez, and Aimee Johansen, 114–122. MA: Cascadilla Press.
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Borer, Hagit. 1994. “The projection of arguments.” In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17, ed. by Elena Benedicto, and Jeffrey Runner, 19–47. Amerst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
Borer, Hagit. 2005. The Normal Course of Events. Structuring Sense, Volume II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. “A Minimalist program for linguistic theory”. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. By Kenneth L. Hale, and Samuel Jay Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “Minimalist inquiries: the framework.” In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. “Derivation by phase.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Embick, David, and Rolf Noyer. 2001. “Movement operations after syntax.” Linguistic Inquiry 32 (4): 555–595.
Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
Folli, Raffaella, and Harley Heidi. 2004. “Flavors of v: Consuming results in Italian and English.” In Aspectual Inquiries, ed. by Roumyana Slabakova, and Paula Kempchinsky, 95–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Folli, Raffaella, and Heidi Harley. 2007. “Causation, obligation and argument structure: On the nature of little v.” Linguistic Inquiry 38 (2): 197–238.
Folli, Raffaella, and Heidi Harley. in prep. “A head-movement approach to the manner-of-motion parameter”. Ms, University of Ulster, University of Arizona.
Folli, Raffaella. 2001. Constructing Telicity in English and Italian. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oxford.
Harley, Heidi. 2005. “How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, Manner Incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English.” In The Syntax of Aspect, ed. by Nomi Erteschik-Shir, and Tova Rapoport, 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harley, Heidi. 2008. “The bipartite structure of verbs cross-linguistically, or, Why Mary can't exhibit John her paintings.” In Conferências do V Congresso Internacional da Associação Brasileira de Lingüística, ed. by Thaïs Cristófaro Silva, and Heliana Mello, 45–84. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: ABRALIN and FALE/UFMG.
Higginbotham, James. 2000. Accomplishments. Ms. University of Oxford.
Iacobini, Claudio, and Francesca Masini. 2006. “The emergence of verb-particle constructions in Italian: locative and actional meanings.” Morphology 16 (2): 155–188.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Masini, Francesca. 2005. “Multi-Word Expressions between Syntax and the Lexicon: The Case of Italian Verb-Particle Constructions.” SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 145–173.
Mateu, Jaume, and Gemma Rigau. 2010. “Verb-particle constructions in Romance: a lexical-syntactic account”. Probus 22 (2): 241–269.
Mateu, Jaume. 2002. Argument Structure. Relational Construal at the Syntax- Semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, UAB.
Napoli, Donna Jo. 1992. “Secondary resultative predicates in Italian”. Journal of Linguistics 28: 53–90.
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin. 2005. “Change of State Verbs: Implications for Theories of Argument Projection”, in The Syntax of Aspect, ed. by Nomi Erteschik-Shir, and Tova Rapoport, 274–286. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin. 2010. “Reflections on Manner/Result Complementarity'”, in Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure, ed. by Edit Doron, Malka Rappaport Hovav, and Ivy Sichel, 21–38. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Snyder, William. 1995. Language acquisition and language variation: The role of morphology. MIT dissertation, Cambridge, MA.
Snyder, William. 2001. “On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation.” Language 77: 324–342
Talmy, Leonard. 1975. “Semantics and Syntax of Motion”. In Syntax and Semantics 4: 181–238.
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. “Force Dynamics in language and thought”. Papers from
the Regional Meetings
, Chicago Linguistic Society 21: 293–337.
Tenny, Carol. 1992. “The aspectual interface hypothesis.” In Lexical matters, ed. by Ivan A. Sag and Anna Szabolsci, 1–27. Stanford: Stanford University.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Alexiadou, Artemis
2020. The Complexity of Greek Verbal Morphology. In Complex Words, ► pp. 192 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.