Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 28, Lisbon
Edited by Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo and Sandra Pereira
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10] 2016
► pp. 103120
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor
2010Argument structure and the syntax-morphology interface. A case study in Latin and other languages. PhD. thesis, Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
2012 “A layered-derivation approach to conflation”. Ms, Cambridge University. [URL]
Adger, David
2003Core syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, and Elena Anagnostopoulou
2011 “Decomposing the Greek Verb”. Talk presented at Approaches to the lexicon: Roots III , June 16, 2011, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Asyllogistou, Athanasia
2015 “Result in prefixed verbs in the diachrony of Greek. Evidence from Homeric and Classical Greek”, Handout from The diachrony of Satellite and Verb framed languages , Ulster University workshop, October 16th 2015.
Beavers, John, and Andrew Koontz-Garboden
2012 “Manner and result in the roots of verbal meaning”. Linguistic Inquiry 43 (3): 331–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John, Beth Levin, and Shiao Wei Tham
2010 “The typology of motion expressions revisited.” Journal of Linguistics 46: 331–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beck, Sigrid, and William Snyder
2001 “Complex predicates and goal PP's: Evidence for a semantic parameter.” In Proceedings of the 25th Boston University Conference on Language Development, ed. by Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Dominguez, and Aimee Johansen, 114–122. MA: Cascadilla Press. Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1984Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 “The projection of arguments.” In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17, ed. by Elena Benedicto, and Jeffrey Runner, 19–47. Amerst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
2005The Normal Course of Events. Structuring Sense, Volume II. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1993 “A Minimalist program for linguistic theory”. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. By Kenneth L. Hale, and Samuel Jay Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 “Minimalist inquiries: the framework.” In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 “Derivation by phase.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Embick, David, and Rolf Noyer
2001 “Movement operations after syntax.” Linguistic Inquiry 32 (4): 555–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David
2010Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella, and Harley Heidi
2004 “Flavors of v: Consuming results in Italian and English.” In Aspectual Inquiries, ed. by Roumyana Slabakova, and Paula Kempchinsky, 95–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella, and Heidi Harley
2007 “Causation, obligation and argument structure: On the nature of little v.” Linguistic Inquiry 38 (2): 197–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in prep. “A head-movement approach to the manner-of-motion parameter”. Ms, University of Ulster, University of Arizona.
Folli, Raffaella
2001Constructing Telicity in English and Italian. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
1995Subjects, Events and Licensing. PhD dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
2005 “How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, Manner Incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English.” In The Syntax of Aspect, ed. by Nomi Erteschik-Shir, and Tova Rapoport, 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “The bipartite structure of verbs cross-linguistically, or, Why Mary can't exhibit John her paintings .” In Conferências do V Congresso Internacional da Associação Brasileira de Lingüística, ed. by Thaïs Cristófaro Silva, and Heliana Mello, 45–84. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: ABRALIN and FALE/UFMG.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James
2000Accomplishments. Ms. University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Iacobini, Claudio, and Francesca Masini
2006 “The emergence of verb-particle constructions in Italian: locative and actional meanings.” Morphology 16 (2): 155–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English verb classes and alternations. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca
2005 “Multi-Word Expressions between Syntax and the Lexicon: The Case of Italian Verb-Particle Constructions.” SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 145–173.Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume, and Gemma Rigau
2010 “Verb-particle constructions in Romance: a lexical-syntactic account”. Probus 22 (2): 241–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mateu, Jaume
2002Argument Structure. Relational Construal at the Syntax- Semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, UAB.Google Scholar
2008 “On the l-syntax of directionality/resultativity: The case of Germanic preverbs”. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P, ed. by Anna Asbury et al., 221–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matushansky, Ora
2006 “Head movement in linguistic theory.” Linguistic Inquiry 37 (1): 69–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew
2004 “Event paths, conflation, argument structure, and VP shells”. Linguistics 42 (3): 523–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo
1992 “Secondary resultative predicates in Italian”. Journal of Linguistics 28: 53–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008Verb meaning and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin
2005 “Change of State Verbs: Implications for Theories of Argument Projection”, in The Syntax of Aspect, ed. by Nomi Erteschik-Shir, and Tova Rapoport, 274–286. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 “Reflections on Manner/Result Complementarity'”, in Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure, ed. by Edit Doron, Malka Rappaport Hovav, and Ivy Sichel, 21–38. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snyder, William
1995Language acquisition and language variation: The role of morphology. MIT dissertation, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
2001 “On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation.” Language 77: 324–342 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1975 “Semantics and Syntax of Motion”. In Syntax and Semantics 4: 181–238.Google Scholar
1985 “Force Dynamics in language and thought”. Papers from the Regional Meetings , Chicago Linguistic Society 21: 293–337.
Tenny, Carol
1992 “The aspectual interface hypothesis.” In Lexical matters, ed. by Ivan A. Sag and Anna Szabolsci, 1–27. Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Alexiadou, Artemis
2020. The Complexity of Greek Verbal Morphology. In Complex Words,  pp. 192 ff. DOI logo
Hovav, Malka Rappaport
2019. The change in Hebrew from a V-framed to an S-framed Language. In Language Contact, Continuity and Change in the Genesis of Modern Hebrew [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 256],  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer
2020. Complex Words, DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.