Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 28, Lisbon
Edited by Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo and Sandra Pereira
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 10] 2016
► pp. 103–120

Against deficiency-based typologies

Manner-alternation parameters in Italian and English

| Ulster University
| University of Arizona
Can the well-known verb-framed/satellite-framed variation observed by Talmy (1975 et seq.) be productively analyzed as a true parameter, or is it in fact something else, perhaps a morphological tendency of individual lexical items in a given language? Here we defend the view that it is indeed a parameter, of a well-understood type: a head-movement parameter. We claim that it results from the variety of uninterpretable feature that is bundled with the flavor of v which is used in change-of-state constructions. The technical apparatus employed is another instance of a typical head-movement parameter, of the kind that accounts for the familiar V-to-T or T-to-C parameters. In verb-framed languages, head-movement to change-of-state v0 is mandatory, just as head-movement to finite T0 is mandatory in V-to-T languages. The approach, in contrast to previous analyses, does not ascribe a deficiency to verb-framed languages, either in their semantic composition inventory, or their inventory of structural operations, both of which seem prima facie implausible from a biolinguistic/Minimalist perspective.
Keywords: flavors of v, head-movement, material/product alternation, Path, prepositions, resultatives, Talmy, typology, verb-particle constructions
Published online: 8 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.10.06fol
References (42)
References
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor. 2010. Argument structure and the syntax-morphology interface. A case study in Latin and other languages. PhD. thesis, Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
. 2012. “A layered-derivation approach to conflation”. Ms, Cambridge University. [URL]
Adger, David. 2003. Core syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, and Elena Anagnostopoulou. 2011. “Decomposing the Greek Verb”. Talk presented at Approaches to the lexicon: Roots III , June 16, 2011, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Asyllogistou, Athanasia. 2015. “Result in prefixed verbs in the diachrony of Greek. Evidence from Homeric and Classical Greek”, Handout from The diachrony of Satellite and Verb framed languages , Ulster University workshop, October 16th 2015.
Beavers, John, and Andrew Koontz-Garboden. 2012. “Manner and result in the roots of verbal meaning”. Linguistic Inquiry 43 (3): 331–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John, Beth Levin, and Shiao Wei Tham. 2010. “The typology of motion expressions revisited.” Journal of Linguistics 46: 331–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beck, Sigrid, and William Snyder. 2001. “Complex predicates and goal PP's: Evidence for a semantic parameter.” In Proceedings of the 25th Boston University Conference on Language Development, ed. by Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Dominguez, and Aimee Johansen, 114–122. MA: Cascadilla Press. Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. “The projection of arguments.” In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17, ed. by Elena Benedicto, and Jeffrey Runner, 19–47. Amerst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
. 2005. The Normal Course of Events. Structuring Sense, Volume II. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. “A Minimalist program for linguistic theory”. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. By Kenneth L. Hale, and Samuel Jay Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Minimalist inquiries: the framework.” In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Derivation by phase.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Embick, David, and Rolf Noyer. 2001. “Movement operations after syntax.” Linguistic Inquiry 32 (4): 555–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella, and Harley Heidi. 2004. “Flavors of v: Consuming results in Italian and English.” In Aspectual Inquiries, ed. by Roumyana Slabakova, and Paula Kempchinsky, 95–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella, and Heidi Harley. 2007. “Causation, obligation and argument structure: On the nature of little v.” Linguistic Inquiry 38 (2): 197–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. in prep. “A head-movement approach to the manner-of-motion parameter”. Ms, University of Ulster, University of Arizona.
Folli, Raffaella. 2001. Constructing Telicity in English and Italian. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, Events and Licensing. PhD dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
. 2005. “How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, Manner Incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English.” In The Syntax of Aspect, ed. by Nomi Erteschik-Shir, and Tova Rapoport, 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “The bipartite structure of verbs cross-linguistically, or, Why Mary can't exhibit John her paintings .” In Conferências do V Congresso Internacional da Associação Brasileira de Lingüística, ed. by Thaïs Cristófaro Silva, and Heliana Mello, 45–84. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: ABRALIN and FALE/UFMG.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 2000. Accomplishments. Ms. University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Iacobini, Claudio, and Francesca Masini. 2006. “The emergence of verb-particle constructions in Italian: locative and actional meanings.” Morphology 16 (2): 155–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Masini, Francesca. 2005. “Multi-Word Expressions between Syntax and the Lexicon: The Case of Italian Verb-Particle Constructions.” SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 145–173.Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume, and Gemma Rigau. 2010. “Verb-particle constructions in Romance: a lexical-syntactic account”. Probus 22 (2): 241–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mateu, Jaume. 2002. Argument Structure. Relational Construal at the Syntax- Semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, UAB.Google Scholar
. 2008. “On the l-syntax of directionality/resultativity: The case of Germanic preverbs”. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P, ed. by Anna Asbury et al., 221–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matushansky, Ora. 2006. “Head movement in linguistic theory.” Linguistic Inquiry 37 (1): 69–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew. 2004. “Event paths, conflation, argument structure, and VP shells”. Linguistics 42 (3): 523–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo. 1992. “Secondary resultative predicates in Italian”. Journal of Linguistics 28: 53–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb meaning and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin. 2005. “Change of State Verbs: Implications for Theories of Argument Projection”, in The Syntax of Aspect, ed. by Nomi Erteschik-Shir, and Tova Rapoport, 274–286. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Reflections on Manner/Result Complementarity'”, in Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure, ed. by Edit Doron, Malka Rappaport Hovav, and Ivy Sichel, 21–38. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snyder, William. 1995. Language acquisition and language variation: The role of morphology. MIT dissertation, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
. 2001. “On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation.” Language 77: 324–342 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1975. “Semantics and Syntax of Motion”. In Syntax and Semantics 4: 181–238.Google Scholar
. 1985. “Force Dynamics in language and thought”. Papers from the Regional Meetings , Chicago Linguistic Society 21: 293–337.
Tenny, Carol. 1992. “The aspectual interface hypothesis.” In Lexical matters, ed. by Ivan A. Sag and Anna Szabolsci, 1–27. Stanford: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Alexiadou, Artemis
2020. The Complexity of Greek Verbal Morphology. In Complex Words, ► pp. 192 ff. DOI logo
Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer
2020. Complex Words, DOI logo
Hovav, Malka Rappaport
2019. The change in Hebrew from a V-framed to an S-framed Language. In Language Contact, Continuity and Change in the Genesis of Modern Hebrew [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 256], ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Stative Inquiries [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 264], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.