Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11: Selected papers from the 44th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), London, Ontario
Edited by Silvia Perpiñán, David Heap, Itziri Moreno-Villamar and Adriana Soto-Corominas
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11] 2017
► pp. 33–52

Chapter 2
Towards a unified treatment of Spanish copulas

| University of Greenwich
| University of Tromsø
| University of Lille 3
This paper sets the basis for a uniform account of the alternation between the two Spanish copulas (ser and estar) in adjectival and passive clauses. While the copular contrast has been attributed to the different properties of adjectives (e.g. individual vs. stage level) and to an eventive vs. resultative stative dichotomy in passives, this work shows that they all behave alike regarding their temporal interpretation. We derive such uniformity from the syntactic properties of the copulas themselves: estar includes an additional component ser lacks that makes everything it merges with stative, with particular temporoaspectual properties.
Keywords: copulas, Spanish, ser , estar , aspect, temporal interpretation, syntax-semantics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The temporal interpretation of copular clauses
  • 3.Aspect and tense in passive clauses
    • 3.1The imperfective interpretation
    • 3.2The aspectual role of the copulas
      • 3.2.1Predicates in combination with estar
      • 3.2.2The internal composition of estar
  • 4. Ser and estar with adjectives
  • 5.Some conclusions and loose ends for future research
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.11.02arc
References (50)
References
Alcina, Juan, and José Manuel Blecua. 1975. Gramática española. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Arche, María J. 2006. Individuals in Time. Tense, Aspect and the individual / stage distinction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. “A Note on the Individual-Level/Stage-Level dichotomy: how aspectual is it?” Borealis, An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 1(2): 109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. “The construction of viewpoint aspect. The imperfective revisited”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32(3): 791–831. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arche, María J., and Timothy A. Stowell. In progress. “Evaluative Dispositional Adjectives and the Individual/Stage Distinction”. Ms., University of Greenwich and UCLA.
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1994. “Statives, progressives and habituals”. Linguistics 32: 391–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco and Alessandro Lenci. 2012. “Pluractionality, habituality and gnomic imperfectivity”. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, ed. by Robert Binnick, 852–880. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny. 1999. Aspect and temporal ordering. A contrastive analysis of Dutch and English. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Brucart, Josep M. 2010. “La alternancia ser/estar y las construcciones atributivas de localización”. In Actas del V Encuentro de Gramática Generativa, ed. by Alicia Avellana, 115–152. Maestría en Lingüística, Universidad Nacional del Comahue: Comahue..Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carlson, Gregory N. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Carrasco, Ángeles. 1998. La correlación de tiempos en español. Ph.D. dissertation, Complutense University, Madrid.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995. “Individual-Level predicates as inherent generics”. In The Generic Book, ed. by Gregory N. Carlson and Francis J. Pelletier, 176–224. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
De Miguel, Elena. 1999. “El aspecto léxico”. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, directed by Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte, 2977–3060. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida, and Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. 2000. “The primitives of temporal relations”. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 157–186. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “The syntax of time adverbs”. In The syntax of Time, ed. by Jacqueline Guéron and Jacqueline Lecarme, 217–234. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2007. “The Syntax of Time Arguments”. Lingua 117: 330–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deo, Ashwini. 2012. “Morphology”. In The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, ed. by Robert I. Binnick, 155–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio, Bryan Leferman, and Rafael Marín. 2013. “Evaluative Adjectives are Davidsonian states”. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17: 237–253.Google Scholar
Fernald, Teodore. 1999. “Evidential coercion: Using individual-level predicates in stage-level environments”. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29: 43–63.Google Scholar
Fernández Leborans, María J. 1995. “Las construcciones con el verbo estar: aspectos sintácticos y semánticos”. Verba 22: 253–284.Google Scholar
1999. “La predicación: Las oraciones copulativas”. In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte, 2357–2460. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Gallego, Ángel, and Juan Uriagereka. 2009. “ Estar = Ser + P”. Paper presented at the XIX Colloquium on Generative Grammar, Vitoria, University of the Basque Country.
Gehrke, Berit, and Nino Grillo. 2009. “How to become passive”. In Explorations of Phase Theory: Features, Arguments, and Interpretation at the Interfaces, ed. by Kleanthes Grohmann, 231–268. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1986. “Notes on world view and semantic categories: Some Warlpiri examples”. In Features and Projections, ed. by Peter Muysken and Henk van Riemsdijk, 233–254. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth, and Samuel J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jiménez, Silvia, and Rafael Marín. 2000. “Por activa y por pasiva”. Actas del IV Congreso de Lingüística General, Cádiz, 3: 1501–1513.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward, and Matthew Dryer. 2007. “Passive in the world’s languages”. In Clause structure, language typology and syntactic description, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 325–361. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. 1963. Action, emotion and will. London: Routledge and Kegan.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1994. The event argument and the semantics of voice. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Building statives”. Berkeley Linguistic Society 26: 385–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1970. Irregularity in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2006. “Ways of being rude”. Ms., Ben Gurion University.Google Scholar
Lenci, Alessandro, and Pier Marco Bertinetto. 2000. “Aspect, adverbs, and events: habituality vs. perfectivity”. In Speaking of events, ed. by James Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi, and Achille Varzi (eds.), Speaking of events, 245–287. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marcos Marín, Francisco. 1980. Curso de gramática española. Madrid: Editorial Cincel.Google Scholar
Marín, Rafael. 2010. “Spanish adjectives within bounds”. In Adjectives: Formal analysis in syntax and semantics, ed. by Patricia Cabredo and Ora Matushansky, 307–331. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya. 1999. “Construcciones con se: Medias, pasivas e impersonales”. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque and Violeta Demonte, 1631–1722. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Oshima, David Y. 2009. “Between being wise and acting wise: A hidden conditional in some constructions with propensity adjectives”. Journal of Linguistics 45(2): 363–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piñón, Christopher. 1997. “Achievements in an Event Semantics”. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 7, ed. by Aaron Lawson and Eun Cho, 273–296. Ithaca (NY): CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Cristina. 1992. “SER and ESTAR: A Matter of Aspect”. NELS 22: 411–426.Google Scholar
Stowell, Timothy A. 1991. “The alignment of arguments in adjective phrases”. In Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing [Syntax and Semantics 25], ed. by Susan Rothstein, 105–135. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
1993. “Syntax of tense”. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
1996. “The phrase structure of tense”. In Phrase structure and the lexicon [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory], ed. by Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring, 277–291. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. “The syntactic expression of tense”. Lingua 117: 437–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. “Where the Past is in the Perfect”. In Tiempos compuestos y formas verbales complejas (Lingüistica Iberoamericana Vol. 34), ed. by Ángeles Carrasco, 103–118. Madrid: Vervuert.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1978. “Figure and ground in complex sentences”. In Universals of Human Language, edited by Joseph H. Greenberg, 625–649. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Verkuyl, Henk J. 1999. Aspectual issues. Studies on time and quantity. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Zagona, K. 2010. “Ser and Estar: Phrase structure and aspect”. In Selected Proceedings of Chronos 8 Cahiers Chronos, ed. by C. Nishida and C. Russi, 303–327. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Ntelitheos, Dimitrios & Marta Szreder
2024. Non-verbal predicate negation in child Emirati Arabic. Language Acquisition 31:1 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Cook, Angela
2023. Reconsidering the shi…(de) construction in spoken Mandarin. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 14:2 ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
García-Pardo, Alfredo & Rafael Marín
2022. Passives of Spanish Subject-Experiencer Psychological Verbs are Adjectival Passives. Probus 34:2 ► pp. 367 ff. DOI logo
García-Pardo, Alfredo & Rafael Marín
2022. Passives of Spanish Subject-Experiencer Psychological Verbs are Adjectival Passives. Probus 34:2 ► pp. 367 ff. DOI logo
REQUENA, Pablo E.
2021. Spanish copula selection with adjectives at age three. Journal of Child Language 48:3 ► pp. 621 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Stative Inquiries [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 264], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.