Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11: Selected papers from the 44th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), London, Ontario
Edited by Silvia Perpiñán, David Heap, Itziri Moreno-Villamar and Adriana Soto-Corominas
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11] 2017
► pp. 229–246

Chapter 11
Return to Frenchville

Tracing a near-merger from legacy data

| The University of Texas at Austin
| The University of Texas at Austin
This study investigates a potential case of near-merger in legacy French data from Frenchville, Pennsylvania. With previous research having found a robust differentiation in production between French schwa and the front mid rounded vowels by the final generation of Frenchville French speakers, we hypothesize that a former near-merger of these vowels enabled a subsequent demerger. The present analysis examines schwa and the mid vowels in interview data from the penultimate generation of Frenchville speakers and finds evidence for a near-merger, as the vowels are similar but not identical in duration and spectral quality. The data also support the notion that the differentiation of these vowels by the final generation was likely an innovation, rather than the result of transmission.
Keywords: near-merger, language change, legacy data, rhoticization, vowel systems, schwa, language isolate
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background: The status of schwa French
    • 2.1A case for near-merger?
  • 3.Participants and data
  • 4.Methods
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Results of F3 drop
    • 5.2Results for spectra of the vowels: F1
    • 5.3Results for the spectra of vowels in the front-back dimension: F2-F1
    • 5.4Results of durational measures
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.11.11bul
References (39)
References
Andreasson, Helene N., and Kathrine Asla Østby. 2014. Une étude inter-variété des voyelles moyennes antérieures arrondies en français: une approche phonético-phonologique. In La phonologie du français: Norms, périphéries, modélisation ed. by Jacques Durand, Gjert Kristofferson & Bernard Laks, 35–81. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest.Google Scholar
Bazylko, Sławomir. 1981. “Le statut de [ǝ] dans le système phonématique du français contemporain et quelques questions connexes.” La linguistique 17 (1): 91–101.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink. 2013. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.52, accessed December 14, 2013, [URL]
Bounds, Paulina, Naomi Palosaari, and William A. Kretzschmar, Jr. 2011. Issues in Using Legacy Data.” In Sociophonetics: A Student’s Guide, ed. by Marianna Di Paolo and Malcah Yaeger-Dror, 46–57. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bullock, Barbara E., and Chip Gerfen. 2004a. “Phonological Convergence in a Contracting Language Variety.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7 (2): 95–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004b. “Frenchville French: A Case Study in Phonological Attrition.” International Journal of Bilingualism 8 (3): 303–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “The Preservation of Schwa in the Converging Phonological System of Frenchville (PA) French.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8 (2): 117–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bürki, Audrey, Fougeron, Cécile, Gendrot, Cedric, and Ulrich H. Frauenfelder. 2011. “Phonetic Reduction Versus Phonological Deletion of French Schwa: Some Methodological Issues.” Journal of Phonetics 39: 279–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, Laura, and Jeffrey Steele. 2011. “Synchronic Evidence of a Diachronic Change: Voicing and Duration in French and Spanish Stop–Liquid Clusters.” The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique 56 (2): 147–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coveney, Aidan. 2001. The Sounds of Contemporary French: Articulation and Diversity. Exeter: Elm Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1966. Studies in French and Comparative Phonetics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Di Paolo, Marianna, and Alice Faber. 1990. “Phonation Differences and the Phonetic Content of the Tense-Lax Contrast in Utah English.” Language Variation and Change 2 (2): 155–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faber, Alice, and Marianna Di Paolo. 1995. “The Discriminability of Nearly Merged Sounds”. Language Variation and Change 7: 35–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile, Cedric Gendrot, and Audrey Bürki. 2007. “On the Phonetic Identity of French Schwa Compared to /ø/ and /œ/.” Paper presented at the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, August 6–10, 2007.
Hall, Kathleen C., and Elizabeth V. Hume. 2013. “Perceptual Confusability of French Vowels.” Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 19: 060113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Anita Berit. 1994. “Étude du E caduc: stabilisation en cours et variations lexicales.” Journal of French Language Studies 4: 25–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “A Study of Young Parisian Speech: Some Trends in Pronunciation.” In Phonological Variation in French: Illustrations from Three Continents, ed. by Randall Scott Gess, Chantal Lyche, and Trudel Meisenburg, 151–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2004. “Mergers, Near-Mergers and Phonological Interpretation.” In New Perspectives on English Historical Linguistics, ed. by Christian J. Kay, Carole Hough, and Irené Wotherspoon, 125–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janson, Tore, and Richard Schulman. 1983. “Non-distinctive Features and Their Use.” Journal of Linguistics 19 (2): 321–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2007. “Transmission and Diffusion.” Language 83 (2): 344–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Mark Karen, and Corey Miller. 1991. “Near-mergers and the Suspension of Phonemic Contrast.” Language Variation and Change 3 (1): 33–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William, Malcah Yaeger, and Richard Steiner. 1972. A Quantitative Study of Sound Change in Progress (Vol. 1). Philadelphia: The U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Léon, Pierre. 2007. Phonétisme et pronunciations du français, 5e édition. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Malécot, André. 1974. “The Frequency of Occurrence of Phonemes and Consonant Clusters in French.” Phonetics 29: 158–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malécot, André, and Gérard Chollet. 1977. “The Acoustic Status of the Mute-e in French”. Phonetica 34 (1): 19–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manaster Ramer, Alexis. 1996. “A Letter from an Incompletely Neutral Phonologist.” Journal of Phonetics 24 (4): 477–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinet, André. 1972. “La nature phonologique d’e caduc.” In Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics to the Memory of Pierre Delattre, ed. by Albert Valdman, 393–399. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff. 2013. “Ultrasound and Corpus Study of a Change from Below: Vowel Rhoticity in Canadian French.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19 (2): 141–150.Google Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles. 1978. “The Status of Mute ‘e’.” Studies in French Linguistics 1 (2): 79–140.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Le français de référence et les normes de pronunciation.” Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 26 (1): 91–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mougeon, Françoise, and Dorin Uritescu. 2006. “Les derniers Français de Frenchville.” La Linguistique 42 (1): 115–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tranel, Bernard. 1987. “French Schwa and Nonlinear Phonology.” Linguistics 25: 845–866. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valdman, Albert. 1979. “Créolisation, français populaire et le parler des isolats francophones d’Amérique du Nord.” In Le français hors de France, ed. by Albert Valdman, 181–197. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Verluyten, S. Paul. 1988. La phonologie du schwa français. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, Douglas C. 1993. “Schwa and /œ/ in French.” Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38 (1): 43–64.Google Scholar
Walter, Henriette. 1982. Enquête phonologique du français. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Wassink, Alicia Beckford. 2006. “A Geometric Representation of Spectral and Temporal Vowel Features: Quantification of Vowel Overlap in Three Varieties.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (4): 2334–2350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, Alan C. L. 2007. “Understanding Near Mergers: The Case of Morphological Tone in Cantonese.” Phonology 24 (1): 187–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Molina García, Álvaro
2023. The pitfalls of near-mergers: A sociophonetic approach to near-demergers in the Malaga /θ/ vs /s/ split. Open Linguistics 9:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.