Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 12: Selected papers from the 45th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Campinas, Brazil
Edited by Ruth E.V. Lopes, Juanito Ornelas de Avelar and Sonia M. L. Cyrino
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 12] 2017
► pp. 111–126

Chapter 8
Locality constraints on θ-theory

Evidence from Spanish ditransitives

| Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas – Universidad de Buenos Aires
| Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas – Universidad de Buenos Aires
We focus on a pattern of Spanish se-reflexivization in ditransitive contexts that has not received due attention in the previous literature, namely, the impossibility of reflexivizing the direct object in presence of a dative clitic. In doing so, we will argue in favor of a particular long-distance approach to θ-assignment and against attract-based models. We will also defend the view of se as an edge marker (i.e., a v expletive) and argue against the hypothesis of se as residue of A-movement.
Keywords: θ-theory, dative alternation, locality, reflexives, Spanish ditransitive constructions
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical assumptions
    • 2.1Locality and theta-role assignment
    • 2.2SE-reflexivity in Spanish
  • 3.Deriving the main pattern
  • 4.Further predictions
  • 5.An alternative analysis
    • 5.1The Movement Theory of Reflexivization
    • 5.2Some problems for the MTR
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.12.08kam
References (21)
References
Boeckx, Cedric, Norbert Hornstein, and Jairo Nunes. 2008. “Copy-Reflexive and Copy-Control Constructions. A Movement Analysis.” Linguistic Variation Yearbook 8(1): 61–99.Google Scholar
Bonet i Alsina, M. Eulalia. 1991. Morphology after Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Step by step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger, A. Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Derivation by Phase.” In Ken Hale. A Life in Language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cuervo, Cristina. 2003. Datives at Large. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta. 1995. “Dative Alternation in Spanish.” Probus 7: 5–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David and Alec Marantz. 2008. “Architecture and Blocking.” Linguistic Inquiry 39(1): 1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. “Movement and Control.” Linguistic Inquiry 30(1): 69–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaminszczik, Sonia and Andrés Saab. 2016. “Patrones de reflexivización en oraciones ditransitivas. Consecuencias para la teoría temática.” Verba 43: 149–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard K. 1988. “On Double Object Construction.” Linguistic Inquiry 19(3): 335–391.Google Scholar
Marvin, Tatjana. 2002. Topics in the Stress and Syntax of Words. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Masullo, Pascual. 1992. Incorporation and Case Theory in Spanish: A Crosslinguistic Perspective, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2004. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ormazabal, Juan and Juan Romero. 2007. “The Object Agreement Constraint.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 315–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pujalte, Mercedes and Andrés Saab. 2011. “Dativos agregados y movimiento-A: un argumento en favor de la teoría de control por movimiento.” In Cuadernos de la ALFAL, ed. by José Camacho, Marta Luján and Liliana Sánchez, 200–215. ISSN 2218–0761.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Syncretism as PF-Repair: The Case of se-Insertion in Spanish.” In The End of Argument Structure?, Syntax and Semantics 38, ed. by M. Cristina Cuervo and Yves Roberge, 229–260. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Sobre la interacción entre caso y concordancia en impersonales y pasivas con se .” Traslaciones 1(1): 30–55.Google Scholar
Saab, Andrés. 2014. “Syntax or Nothing. Some Theoretical and Empirical Remarks on Implicit Arguments.” Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 3(2): 125–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “On Long-Distance Theta-Role Assignment.” Lingua 160: 91–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle. 2012. “A New Take on Partial Control: Defective Thematic Intervention.” Cambridge Occasional Papers in Lingüistics 6(1): 1–47. [available in: [URL]].