Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 12: Selected papers from the 45th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Campinas, Brazil
Edited by Ruth E.V. Lopes, Juanito Ornelas de Avelar and Sonia M. L. Cyrino
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 12] 2017
► pp. 159–184

Chapter 11
Circumventing ɸ-minimality

On some unorthodox cases of A-movement in Brazilian Portuguese

| Universidade de São Paulo
In this paper I argue that locative agreement and possessor raising in Brazilian Portuguese (BP) should be subsumed under Nunes’s (2008) analysis of hyper-raising in BP. More specifically, I propose that these unorthodox instances of A-movement in BP do not violate minimality, for the crossed potential interveners become inert for purposes of A-movement after receiving inherent Case. The proposed analysis extends to “extralong” cases of possessor raising and mixed patterns involving possessor raising out of locative configurations and provides an account for the role of the EPP in bleeding ɸ-minimality.
Keywords: hyper-raising, locative agreement, possessor raising, A-movement, Minimality, inherent Case, Brazilian Portuguese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Subject hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese
  • 3.More instances of inherent Case circumventing ɸ-minimality
  • 4.Some consequences
    • 4.1“Extralong” A-movement
    • 4.2Mixed cases
  • 5.Movement-dependent agreement and the role of the EPP
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.12.11nun
References (40)
References
Andrade, Aroldo de and Charlotte Galves. 2014. A unified analysis for subject topics in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 13: 117–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avelar, Juanito. 2009. Inversão locativa e sintaxe de concordância no português brasileiro. Matraga 16: 232–252.Google Scholar
Avelar, Juanito and Charlotte Galves. 2011. Tópico e concordância em português brasileiro e português europeu. In A. Costa, I. Falé, and P. Barbosa (eds.), Textos Selecionados, XXVI Encontro da Associação Portuguese de Linguística. Lisboa: Apl, 49–65.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric, Norbert Hornstein, and Jairo Nunes. 2010a. Control as Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. Icelandic control really is A-movement: Reply to Bobaljik and Landau. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 111–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Britto, Helena. 1997. Deslocamento à esquerda, resumptivo-sujeito, ordem SV e a codificação sintática de juízos categórico e tético no português do Brasil. Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in Language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1–52.Google Scholar
. 2008. On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, and M. L. Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 133–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duarte, Maria Eugênia. 2004. On the embedding of a syntactic change. Language Variation in Europe, Papers from ICLaVE 2. Uppsala: Universitetstryckeriet, 145–155.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Marcelo. 2000. Argumentos nulos em português brasileiro. M.A. thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
. 2009. Null subjects and finite control in Brazilian Portuguese. In J. Nunes (ed.), Minimalist Essays on Brazilian Portuguese Syntax. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 17–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo Silva, Maria Cristina. 1996. A posição do sujeito no português brasileiro: frases finitas e infinitivas Campinas: Editora da UNICAMP.Google Scholar
Galves, Charlotte. 1998. Tópicos, sujeitos, pronomes e concordância no português brasileiro. Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos 34: 7–21.Google Scholar
. 2001. Ensaios sobre as Gramáticas do Português. Campinas: Editora da UNICAMP.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth and Samuel Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 53–109.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 69–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kato, Mary A. 1989. Tópico e sujeito: Duas categorias em sintaxe? Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos 17: 109–132.Google Scholar
Lobato, Lucia. 2006. Sobre a questão da influência ameríndia na formação do português do Brasil. In D. E. Silva (ed.), Língua, Gramática e Discurso. Goiânia: Cânone, 54–86.Google Scholar
Lunguinho, Marcus. 2006. Partição de constituintes no português brasileiro: características sintáticas. In D. E. Silva (ed.), Língua, Gramática e Discurso. Goiânia: Cânone, 133–147.Google Scholar
Martins, Ana Maria and Jairo Nunes. 2010. Apparent hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese: agreement with topics across a Finite CP. In P. E. Panagiotidis (ed.), The Complementiser Phase: Subjects and Operators, 142–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munhoz, Ana. 2011. A estrutura argumental das construções de tópico-sujeito: O caso dos sujeitos locativos. M.A. thesis, Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar
Munhoz, Ana and Rozana Naves. 2012. Construções de Tópico-Sujeito: uma proposta em termos de estrutura argumental e de transferência de traços de C. Signum 15: 245–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Negrão, Esmeralda. 1999. O português brasileiro: Uma língua voltada para o discurso. “Tese de livre-docência”, Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Negrão, Esmeralda and Evani Viotti. 2008. Estratégias de impessoalização no português brasileiro. In J. L. Fiorin and M. Petter (eds.), África no Brasil: A Formação da Língua Portuguesa. São Paulo: Contexto, 179–203.Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2007. Relativized minimality and the Extended Peeking Principle. Cuadernos de Lingüística XIV: 73–86.Google Scholar
. 2008. Inherent Case as a licensing condition for A-movement: The case of hyper-raising constructions in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 7: 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Relativizing minimality for A-movement: ɸ- and θ-relations. Probus 22: 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Subespecificação de traços-ɸ e hiperalçamento em português brasileiro. In C. Figueiredo and E. Araújo (eds.), Diálogos com Ribeiro: Sobre gramática e história da língua portuguesa. Salvador: Edufba, 121–148.Google Scholar
. 2016. Subject and topic hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese: A case study on reference sets for economy computations.” In M. A. Kato and F. Ordoñez (eds.), Morphosyntax of Spanish and Portuguese in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petersen, Maria Carolina. 2011. O licenciamento do sujeito nulo em orações subjuntivas no português brasileiro. M.A. thesis, Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David and Esther Torrego. 2001. T-to-C movement: causes and consequences In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: a life in language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 355–426.Google Scholar
Pontes, Eunice. 1987. O Tópico no Português do Brasil. Campinas: Pontes.Google Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo. 1987. Romance infinitival clauses and Case Theory. In C. Neidle and R. Nuñez-Cedeño (eds.), Studies in Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris, 237–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Cilene. 2004. Impoverished Morphology and A-movement out of Case Domains. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Ura, Hiroyuki. 1994. Varieties of raising and the feature-based bare phrase structure theory. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 7. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Viotti, Evani. 2007. Ordem VS no português brasileiro: Questionando a existência de expletivos nulos. In A. Castillho, M. A. Torres Morais, R. Lopes, and S. Cyrino (eds.): Descrição, História e Aquisição do Português Brasileiro. Campinas: Pontes/FAPESP.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen. 2006. Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Joan Maling, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1985. Case and grammatical functions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 441–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Gonçalves, Anabela & Madalena Colaço
2024. Is there hyper-raising in European Portuguese?. Probus 36:1 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Nunes, Jairo & Mary A. Kato
2023. Approaching the So-Called Topic-Subjects in Brazilian Portuguese from Below. In Formal Approaches to Languages of South America, ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Kato, Mary A. & Francisco Ordóñez
2019. Topic Subjects in Brazilian Portuguese and Clitic Left Dislocation in Dominican Spanish: The Role of Clitics and Null Subjects. Syntax 22:2-3 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.