Biezma, María
2013 “Only one at least: Refining the Role of Discourse in Building Alternatives”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19 (1): 11–19.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel
2008 “The least at least can do”. In Proceedings of WCCFL 26, ed. by Charles B. Chang and Hannah J. Haynie, 114–120. Somerville, Massachusetts: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2003 “On D-trees, beans, and B-accents”. Linguistics and philosophy, 26 (5): 511–545.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeRose, Keith, and Richard E. Grandy
1999 “Conditional Assertions and ‘Biscuit’ Conditionals”. Noûs 33: 405–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald
1979Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Geurts, Bart, and Rick Nouwen
2007 “ At least et al.: The Semantics of Scalar Modifiers”. Language 83 (3): 533–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N.
1992 “Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen”. In Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, ed. by Joachim Jacobs, 112–141. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1999 “At Least Some Determiners aren’t Determiners”. In The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, ed. by Ken Turner, 257–291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nakanishi, Kimiko, and Hotze Rullmann
2009 “Epistemic and Concessive Interpretations of at least ”. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Carlton University.Google Scholar
Romero, Maribel, and Chung-hye Han
2004 “On Negative Yes/No Questions”. Linguistics & Philosophy 27 (5): 609–658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Muffy E.  A.
2006 “Biscuit conditionals: Quantification over potential literal acts”. Linguistics & Philosophy, 29 (2): 167–203.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
1975 “Indicative Conditionals”. Philosophia 5: 269–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Tiel, Bob, Emiel van Miltenburg, Natalia Zevakhina and Bart Geurts
2016 “Scalar diversity”. Journal of Semantics 33 (1): 137–175.Google Scholar