References (13)
References
Biezma, María. 2013. “Only one at least: Refining the Role of Discourse in Building Alternatives”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19 (1): 11–19.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 2008. “The least at least can do”. In Proceedings of WCCFL 26, ed. by Charles B. Chang and Hannah J. Haynie, 114–120. Somerville, Massachusetts: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. “On D-trees, beans, and B-accents”. Linguistics and philosophy, 26 (5): 511–545.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeRose, Keith, and Richard E. Grandy. 1999. “Conditional Assertions and ‘Biscuit’ Conditionals”. Noûs 33: 405–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Geurts, Bart, and Rick Nouwen. 2007. “ At least et al.: The Semantics of Scalar Modifiers”. Language 83 (3): 533–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N. 1992. “Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen”. In Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, ed. by Joachim Jacobs, 112–141. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1999. “At Least Some Determiners aren’t Determiners”. In The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, ed. by Ken Turner, 257–291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nakanishi, Kimiko, and Hotze Rullmann. 2009. “Epistemic and Concessive Interpretations of at least ”. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Carlton University.Google Scholar
Romero, Maribel, and Chung-hye Han. 2004. “On Negative Yes/No Questions”. Linguistics & Philosophy 27 (5): 609–658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Muffy E.  A. 2006. “Biscuit conditionals: Quantification over potential literal acts”. Linguistics & Philosophy, 29 (2): 167–203.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1975. “Indicative Conditionals”. Philosophia 5: 269–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Tiel, Bob, Emiel van Miltenburg, Natalia Zevakhina and Bart Geurts. 2016. “Scalar diversity”. Journal of Semantics 33 (1): 137–175.Google Scholar