Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 29, Nijmegen
Edited by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs and Dominique Nouveau
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13] 2018
► pp. 315–336

Occitan, verb second and the Medieval Romance word order debate

 | University of Oxford
This study presents a discussion of the word order properties of Old Occitan, a Medieval Romance language which remains under-studied in comparison to many of its sister languages. I argue that it was a V2 system and in particular that the locus of the V2 property was a low left-peripheral head, namely Fin, yielding a descriptively ‘relaxed’ V2 grammar, with systematic V-to-Fin0 movement but widespread verb-third or more orders. Data are presented from a wide range of related properties that show that Occitan occupies a unique position within the wider typology of V2 languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Background
    • 1.1Old Occitan
    • 1.2Issues in the Medieval Romance V2 typology
  • 2.A V2 grammar
    • 2.1Verb placement
    • 2.2The left periphery
      • 2.2.1V2 clauses
      • 2.2.2CP Information-Structure
      • 2.2.3Verb third
      • 2.2.4A note on si
      • 2.2.5Null constituents
    • 2.3Clause-type asymmetries
  • 3.Occitan in the V2 typology
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.13.19wol
References (87)
References
Adams, Marianne. 1987a. “Embedded Pro.” In Proceedings of NELS 16, ed. by James Blevins and Juli Carter, 1:1–22. Massachusetts: GSLA.Google Scholar
. 1987b. “From Old French to the Theory of Pro-Drop”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 5 (1): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. Les effets V2 en ancien et en moyen français. Revue québécoise de linguistique théorique et appliqué 7. 13–39.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2008. Structures and Strategies. New York: London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 1995. Complement clitics in medieval Romance: The Tobler-Mussafia law. In Ian Roberts & Adrian Battye (eds.), Clause structure and language change., 325–344. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. “On the Position of Topic and Focus in the Left Periphery”. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, edited by Guglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi, 39–64. London/New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2004. “The Left Periphery of Medieval Romance”. Studi Linguistici E Filologici Online 2 (2): 243–297.Google Scholar
. 2006. “A Detailed Map of the Left Periphery of Medieval Romance”. In Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture, ed. by Raffaella Zanuttini, 53–86. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Caratteristiche Del V2 Romanzo. Lingue Romanze Antiche, Ladino Dolomitico E Portoghese”. In Introduzione Alla Linguistica Del Mòcheno, edited by Ermenegildo Bidese and Federica Cognola, 65–84. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola, andNicola Munaro, eds. 2010. Mapping the Left Periphery. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 5. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola, and Cecilia Poletto. 2004. “Topic, Focus, and V2”. In The Structure of CP and IP, ed. by Luigi Rizzi, 52–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans den. 1977. “On the Interaction of Root Transfomrations and Lexical Deletive Rules”. In On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, ed. byWerner Abraham, 47–61. Amsterdam/Philadelphia:Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Ian Roberts. 2002. “Clause Structure and X-Second”. In Functional Structure in DP and IP, vol. 1, ed. by Guglielmo Cinque, 123–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2001. “Restructuring’ and the Order of Aspectual and Root Modal Heads”. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, ed. by Guglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi, 137–156. Oxford: New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio. 2006. “Information Focus in Sicilian and the Left Periphery.” In Phases of Interpretation, ed. by Mara Frascarelli, 363–385. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Focalization and Word Order in Old Italo-Romance”. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 95–132.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Bryan. 2015. “Discourse Functions of Subject Left Dislocation in Old Occitan”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16 (2): 159–186. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Preverbal Subjects, Information Structure and Object Clitic Position in Old Occitan”. Journal of Linguistics 52 (01): 37–69. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
Ferraresi, Gisella, and Maria Goldbach. 2002. “V2 Syntax and Topicalization in Old French”. Linguistiche Berichte 189: 2–25.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1991. “Discourse Pragmatics and the Grammar of Old French: A Functional Reinterpretation of ‘si’ and the Personal Pronouns”. Romance Philology 44: 251–283.Google Scholar
Fontana, Josep. 1993. Phrase structure and the syntax of clitics in the history of Spanish. University of Pennsylvania Doctoral Dissertation.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara, and Roland Hinterhölzl. 2007. “Types of Topics in German and Italian”. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form, ed. by Susanne Winkler and Kerstin Schwabe, 87–116. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2000. “Inversion, Non-Adjacent Inversion and Adjuncts in CP”. Transactions of the Philological Society 98 (1): 121–160. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane, and Ciro Greco. 2016. “ V > 2”. presented at the Rethinking Verb Second Workshop, St John’s College, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hamlin, Frank R., Peter T. Ricketts & John Hathaway. 1967. Introduction à l’étude de l’ancien provençal. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline. 2006. “Embedded Root Phenomena”. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ed. by Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 174–209. Blackwell Publishing. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2005. “Is There a Little Pro? Evidence from Finnish”. Linguistic Inquiry 36 (4): 533–564. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Verb Second”. In Syntax-Theory and Analysis, ed. by Tibor Kiss and Artemis Alexiadou, 242–283. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hulk, Aafke, and Jean-Yves Pollock. 2001. “Subject Positions in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar”. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, 3–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hulk, Aafke, and Ans van Kemenade. 1995. “ Verb-Second, Pro-Drop, Functional Projections and Language Change. ” In Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Ian Roberts and Adrian Battye, 227–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Frede. 1990. Old French and Comparative Gallo-Romance Syntax. Tübingen: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Syntaxe de l’ancien occitan. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Georg A. 2002. Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in anden Romanischen Sprachen. Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1975. “Dutch as an SOV Language“. Linguistic Analysis 1: 111–136.Google Scholar
Kunert, Hans. 2003. “L’ordine degli elementi della frase in occitano antico”. Romanische Forschungen 115: 194–209.Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie. 2007. “Clausal Architecture in Early Old French”. Lingua 117 (1): 289–316. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form : Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2007. “Old Neapolitan Word Order: Some Initial Observations”. In Histories and Dictionaries of the Languages of Italy, ed. by Anna Laura Lepschy and Arturo Tosi, 121–149. Ravenna: Longo.Google Scholar
. 2008. Satisfying V2 in Early Romance: Merge vs. Move.” Journal of Linguistics 44 (02): 437–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemieux, Monique, and Fernande Dupuis. 1995. “The Locus of Verb Movement in Non-Asymmetric Verb-Second Languages: The Case of Middle French”. In Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Ian Roberts and Adrian Battye, 80–110. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1995. “Why UG Needs a Learning Theory: Triggering Verb Movement”. In Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts, 31–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane. 1985. Dire le vrai: L’adverbe « si » en Français Médieval: Essai de linguistique historique. Publications Romanes et Françaises, CLXVIII. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Éric. 2006. “Stylistic Fronting in Old French”. Probus 18: 219–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “The Left Periphery in Old French”. In Research in Old French: The State of the Art, ed. by Deborah Arteaga, 327–350. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Oliviéri, Michèle, and Patrick Sauzet. 2016. “Southern Gallo-Romance (Occitan)”. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, ed. By Adam Ledgeway and Martin Maiden, 319–349. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paoli, Sandra. 2010. “In Focus: An Investigation of Information and Contrastive Constructions”. In Syntactic Variation: The Dialects of Italy, ed. by Roberta D’Alessandro, Adam Ledgeway and Ian Roberts, 277–291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2002. “ The Left-Periphery of V2-Rhaetoromance Dialects: A New View on V2 and V3. ” In Syntactic Microvariation. Meertens Institute Electronic Publications in Linguistics 2 , ed. by Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips and Susanne van der Kleij, 214–242. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
. 2014. Word Order in Old Italian. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Priestley, Leanord. 1955. “Reprise Constructions in French”. Archivum Linguisticum 7: 1–28.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. “Toward a Taxonomy of given-New Information”. In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Reenen, van Pieter, and Lene Schøsler. 1992. “Ancien et Moyen Français: SI ‘Thématique’, Analyse Exhaustive d’une Série de Textes”. Vox Romanica 51: 101–127.Google Scholar
Reenen, Pieter van, and Lene Schøsler. 2000. “The Pragmatic Functions of the Old French Particles Ainz, Apres, Donc, Lors, Or, Pluis, and Si”. In Textual Parameters in Older Languages, ed. by Susan C. Herring, Pieter van Reenen and Lene Schøsler, 59–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rinke, Esther, and Martin Elsig. 2010. “Quantitative Evidence and Diachronic Syntax”. Lingua 120 (11): 2557–2568. doi:DOI logo..Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. “Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of Pro”. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.Google Scholar
. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery”. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Grammar, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–338. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi, and Ian Roberts. 1989. “Complex Inversion in French”. Probus 1: 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 1993. Verbs and diachronic syntax : A comparative history of English and French. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2010. “A Deletion Analysis of Null Subjects”. In Parametric Variation : Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, ed. by Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts and Michelle Sheehan, 58–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2012. “Phases, Head Movement and Second-Position Effects”. In Phases developing the framework, ed. by Ángel J. Gallego, 385–440. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rouveret, Alain. 2004. “Les clitiques pronominaux et la périphérie gauche en Ancien Français”. Bulletin de La Société de Linguistique de Paris 99: 181–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowlett, Paul. 2007. The Syntax of French. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salvesen, Christine. 2011. “Stylistic Fronting and Remnant Movement in Old French”. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2009: Selected Papers from “Going Romance” Nice 2009, ed. by Janine Berns, Haike Jacobs and Tobias Scheer, 323–342. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Topics and the Left Periphery: A Comparison of Old French and Modern Germanic”. In In Search of Universal Grammar: From Old Norse to Zoque, ed. by Terje Lohndal, 131–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salvesen, Christine, and Kristin Bech. 2014. “Postverbal Subjects in Old English and Old French”. Oslo Studies in Language 6 (1): 201–228.Google Scholar
Salvesen, Christine & George Walkden. 2017. Diagnosing embedded V2 in Old English and Old French. In Robert Truswell & Éric Mathieu (eds.), Micro-change and Macro-change in Diachronic Syntax. (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo. 2012. “On the Nature of the V2 System of Medieval Romance”. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Vol. 7, Functional Heads, ed. by Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro and Cecilia Poletto, 103–111. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2005. “A Corpus-Based Study of Null Subjects in Old French and Old Occitan”. In Corpora and Diachronic Linguistics, ed. by Claus D. Putsch, Johannes Kabatek and Wolfgang Raible, 359–374. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
. 2012. “A Comparative Study of Word Order in Old Romance”. Folia Linguistica 46 (2): 1–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steiner, B. Devan. 2014. The Role of Information Structure in the Loss of Verb-Second in the History of French. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Indiana, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Vance, Barbara. 1988. “L’évolution de pro-Drop en Français Médiéval.” Revue Québécoise de Linguistique Théorique et Appliquée 7: 85–109.Google Scholar
. 1993. “Verb-First Declaratives Introduced by et and the Position of Pro in Old and Middle French”. Lingua 89 (2–3): 281–314. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 1995. “On the Decline of Verb Movement to Comp in Old and Middle French”. In Clause Structure and Language Change, ed. by Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts, 173–199. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. Syntactic Change in Medieval French: Verb-Second and Null Subjects. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vance, Barbara, Bryan Donaldson and B. Devan Steiner. 2009. “V2 Loss in Old French and Old Occitan: The Role of Fronted Clauses”. In Romance Linguistics 2009. Selected Papers from the 39th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Tuscon, Arizona, ed. by Sonia Colina, Antxon Olarrea and Ana Maria Carvalho, 301–320. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vanelli, Laura, Lorenzo Renzi and Paola Benincà. 1986. “Tipologia Dei Pronomi Soggetto Nelle Lingue Romanze Medievali”. Quaderni Patavini Di Linguistica 5: 49–66.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit. 2009. The Acquisition of word order: Micro-cues, information structure, and economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Kristine Bentzen, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson and Þorbjörg Hróarsdóttir. 2009. “On the Distribution and Illocution of V2 in Scandinavian That-Clauses”; Lingua , Twists of Mood: The Distribution and Interpretation of Indicative and Subjunctive, 119 (12): 1914–1938. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Sam. 2015a. “ Microparametric Variation in Old Italo-Romance Syntax: The View from Old Sicilian and Old Sardinian. ” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013: Selected Papers from “Going Romance” Amsterdam 2013, ed. by Enoch Oladé Aboh, 51–66. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 8. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015b. “Microvariation in Old Italo-Romance Syntax: The View from Old Sardinian and Old Sicilian”. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 100 (1): 3–36.Google Scholar
. 2015c. “The Nature of Old Spanish Verb Second Reconsidered”. Lingua 164, Part A: 132–155. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2015d. “Verb-Initial Orders in Old Romance: A Comparative Account”. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique LX (2–3): 148–172.Google Scholar
. 2016a. “A Comparative Perspective on the Evolution of Romance Clausal Structure”. Diachronica 33 (4): 461–502. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2016b. “On the Left Periphery of V2 Languages”. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa: Selected Papers from the 41st Incontro di Grammatica Generativa (38): 287–310.Google Scholar
. To appear. “Redefining the V2 Typology: The View from Medieval Romance and Beyond”. ed. by Christine M. Salvesen. Linguistic Variation. Special Issue: A Micro-Perspective on V2 in Germanic and Romance.
Yang, Charles. 2000. Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman, Terje Lohndal & Christine Meklenborg
2023. Adverbial Resumption in Verb Second Languages, DOI logo
Donaldson, Bryan
2021. Clause Structure and Illocutionary Force in Medieval Gallo-Romance: Clitic Position in Old Occitan and Early Old French Sentential Coordination. Probus 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Donaldson, Bryan
2021. Clause Structure and Illocutionary Force in Medieval Gallo-Romance: Clitic Position in Old Occitan and Early Old French Sentential Coordination. Probus 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.