Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 14: Selected papers from the 46th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Stony Brook, NY
Edited by Lori Repetti and Francisco Ordóñez
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 14] 2018
► pp. 245–262

Chapter 14
Causativization of verbs of directed motion in Romance languages

| CNRS-IKER
The purpose of this paper is to shed light on a particular behavior displayed by verbs of inherently directed motion, the availability of a causative transitive alternate, and how this phenomenon interacts with the presence of clitic se in the intransitive variant. Data from Catalan, Aragonese and Italian varieties, none of which have received much attention in the literature, will prove crucial for our proposal. We adopt an inter-Romance perspective and a nanosyntactic approach to lexicalization in order to refine the correlation Jiménez-Fernández and Tubino (2014, 2017) find for Spanish, where inherently directional motion verbs are claimed to be more easily causativized (entrar el coche ‘go in the car’) in varieties where the use of se in the intransitive forms is also more frequent (Juan se entró ‘Juan se went in’).
Keywords: syntactic microvariation, causativization, verbs of directed motion, clitic se , locative clitic, Catalan, Aragonese, Italian, Spanish.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Causative DM verbs
    • 2.1Causativized DM verbs Catalan
    • 2.2Causativized DM verbs in Italian
    • 2.3Causativized DM verbs in Aragonese
    • 2.4Causativized DM verbs in Spanish
  • 3.What does a verb need to be causativized?
    • 3.1Pronominal DM verbs in (varieties of) Catalan
    • 3.2Pronominal DM verbs in (varieties of) Italian
    • 3.3Pronominal DM verbs in (varieties of) Aragonese
  • 4.Proposal
    • 4.1What is ne?
    • 4.2Same structure, different lexicalization
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.14.14pin
References (34)
References
Alvar, Manuel. 1953. El dialecto aragonés. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Andriani, Luigi. 2011. “Differential Object Marking, Clitic Doubling and Argument Structure in Barese.” M.A. thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Arnal Purroy, María Luisa. 1998. El habla de la Baja Ribagorza occidental: aspectos fónicos y gramaticales. Zaragoza: Institución “Fernando el Católico”.Google Scholar
Badia i Margarit, Antoni Maria. 1994. Gramàtica de la llengua catalana. Descriptiva, normativa, diatòpica i diastràtica. Barcelona: Enciclopèdia Catalana.Google Scholar
Basilico, David. 2010. “The se clitic and its relationship to paths.” Probus 22: 271–302.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blinkenberg, Andreas. 1960. Le problème de la transitivité en français moderne. Kobenhavn: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
De Miguel, Elena. 1999. “El aspecto léxico.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, ed. by Ignacio Bosque, and Violeta Demonte, vol. 2, 2977–3060. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
De Miguel, Elena, and Marina Fernández Lagunilla. 2000. “El operador aspectual ‘se’.” Revista española de lingüística 30: 13–44.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella, and Heidi Harley. 2005. “Flavours of v: Consuming Results in Italian and English.” In Aspectual Inquiries, ed. by Paula Kempchinsky, and Roumyana Slabakova, 95–120. Dordrecht: Springer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giralt, Javier. 1995. “Valors i funcions d’ibiiinde als parlars lliterans.” Alazet 7: 57–74.Google Scholar
Gràcia, Lluïsa. 1989. Els verbs ergatius en català. Maó: Institut Menorquí d’Estudis.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel, and Mercedes Tubino, 2014. “Variación sintáctica en la causativización léxica.” RSEL 44 (1): 7–37.Google Scholar
. 2017. “Causativity in Southern Peninsular Spanish.” In The Syntactic Variation of Spanish Dialects, ed. by Ángel Gallego. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2000. A Comparative Syntax of the Dialects of Southern Italy: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2009. Grammatica diacronica del napoletano. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llorente Maldonado, Antonio. 1980. “Consideraciones sobre el español actual.” Anuario de Letras XVIII: 5–61.Google Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, M. Antonia. 1979. Las construcciones pronominales en español. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Masullo, Pascual José. 1992. “Incorporation and case theory in Spanish. A cross-linguistic perspective.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Moll, Francesc de Borja. 1990 [1968]. Gramática catalana referida especialmente a les Illes Balears. Palma de Mallorca: Moll.Google Scholar
Nagore Lain, Francho. 1986. El aragonés de Panticosa. Gramática. Huesca: Diputación Provincial.Google Scholar
Nishida, Chiyo. 1994. “The Spanish reflexive clitic se as an aspectual class marker.” Linguistics 23: 425–458.Google Scholar
Pineda, Anna. 2013. “Double Object Constructions in Spanish (and Catalan) Revisited.” In Romance Language and Linguistic Theory 2011, ed. by Sergio Baauw, Frank Drijkoningen, Luisa Meroni, and Manuela Pinto, 193–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. To appear. “The role of SE and NE in Romance verbs of directed motion. Evidence from Catalan, Italian, Aragonese and Spanish varieties.” In Proceedings from the Workshop on Romance Se-Si, ed. by Grant Armstrong, and Jonathan MacDonald.
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1954a. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Vol. 1. Morfologia. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
. 1954b. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Vol. 2. Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Sánchez López, Cristina. 2002. “Las construcciones con se. Estado de la cuestión.” In Las construcciones con se, ed. by Cristina Sánchez López, 13–163. Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar
Sanchis Guarner, Manuel. 1950. Gramàtica valenciana. València: Torre.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The Syntax of Anti-Causatives. External Arguments in Change-of-state Contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Two Types of External Argument Licensing – The Case of Causers.” Studia Linguistica 66 (2): 1–53.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schroten, Jan. 1972. Concerning the Deep Structure of Spanish Reflexive Sentences. The Hague: Janua Linguarum.Google Scholar
Solà, Joan. 1994. Sintaxi normativa: estat de la qüestió. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Todolí, Júlia. 1990. “Les funcions pronominals en el català del País Valencià.” Miscel·lània Joan Bastardas 4, 253–261.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Els pronoms.” In Gramàtica del català contemporani, ed. by Joan Solà, Maria-Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró, and Manuel Pérez Saldanya, vol. 2, 1337–1433. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Zagona, Karen. 1996. “Compositionality of Aspect: Evidence from Spanish Aspectual se .” In Aspects of Romance Linguistics, ed. by Claudia Parodi, 475–488. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Pineda, Anna
2021. The Role of SE and NE in Romance Verbs of Directed Motion: Evidence from Catalan, Italian, Aragonese and Spanish Varieties. In Unraveling the complexity of SE [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 99], ► pp. 265 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.