Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16: Selected papers from the 47th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Newark, Delaware
Edited by Irene Vogel
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 16] 2020
► pp. 155–170

Clause typing and Quebec French -tu

 | Concordia University
 | McGill University
This paper focuses on the Quebec French particle -tu, which occurs in interrogatives, exclamatives and declaratives indicating surprise. We propose that -tu is the overt instantiation of a polarity (Pol) head that is neither negative nor positive and that -tu also carries an epistemic modality (Mod) feature that is keyed to an ignorant Speaker (S) and a knowledgeable Addressee (A).
Keywords: tu, Quebec French, Polarity, Modality, epistemic commitment, Speaker, Addressee
Article outline
  • 1.General properties of -tu
    • 1.1Distribution
      • 1.1.1Interrogatives
      • 1.1.2Exclamatives
      • 1.1.3Declaratives: Narratives indicating surprise
      • 1.1.4Imperatives
    • 1.2Interpretation of -tu
  • 2.Proposal
    • 2.1‘Tu’ and Polarity
    • 2.2‘Tu’ and modality
    • 2.3Analysis
  • 3.Accounting for the distributional restrictions
    • 3.1Interrogatives
    • 3.2Exclamatives
    • 3.3Declaratives
    • 3.4Imperatives
  • 4.Previous analyses
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.16.10isa
References (29)
References
Abels, Klaus. 2010. “Factivity in Exclamatives is a Presupposition.” Studia Linguistica 64: 141–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adger, David, and Gillian Ramchand. 2005. “Merge vs. Move: Wh-Dependencies Revisited.” Linguistic Inquiry 36 (2): 161–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Anne. 2014. Exclamatives en -tu, donc et assez en français québécois. Montreal, Quebec: Université de Montréal dissertation.Google Scholar
Bibis, Nick, and Yves Roberge. 2004. “Marginal Clitics.” Lingua 114 (8): 1015–1034. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burnett, Heather, and Mireille Tremblay. 2012. “An Extra-Strong NPI? Pantoute in Quebec French.” UCLA WPL 17: 1–8.Google Scholar
Dubois, Caroline 2000. La Grammaire de l’exclamation: Aspects théoriques, français de référence et français québécois. Sherbrooke, Quebec: Université de Sherbrooke MA Thesis.Google Scholar
Heim, Johannes, Hermann Keupdjio, Zoe Wai-ManLam, Adriana Osa-Gómez, and Martina Wiltschko. 2014. “How to Do Things with Particles.” Proceedings of the CLA, 1–15.Google Scholar
Isac, Daniela. 2015. The Morphosyntax of Imperatives. OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2016. “The Silence of Heads.” Studies in Chinese Linguistics 37 (1): 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2001. “The Mirative and Evidentiality.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (3): 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A., and Knud Lambrecht. 1996. “Toward a Construction-Based Model of Language Function: The Case of Nominal Extraposition.” Language 72: 215–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morin, Annick. 2017. Questioning Particles: A Cross-Linguistic Approach to Quebec French Polar Interrogatives. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.Google Scholar
Noonan, Máire, B. 1992. Case and Syntactic Geometry. Montreal, Quebec: McGill University dissertation.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego. 2007. “The Syntax of Valuation and the Interpretability of Features.” In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture. Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation. Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 101, ed. by S. Karimi, V. Samiian, and W. K. Wilkins, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia, and Raffaella Zanuttini. 2003. “Making Imperatives: Evidence from Central Rhaetoromance.” In The Syntax of Italian Dialects, ed. by C. Tortora, 175–207. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 2006. “Subject Clitics and Complex Inversion.” In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ed. by Martin Everaert, and Henk van Riemsdijk, 601–659. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2004. “The Semantics of Imperatives Within a Theory of Clause Types.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory 14: 235–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2011. “Exclamatives, Degrees and Speech Acts.” Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (5): 411–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “A Degree Account of Exclamatives.” In Proceedings of SALT XVIII, ed. by J. Rett, T. Friedman, and S. Ito, 601–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowlett, Paul. 2007. The Syntax of French. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speas, Peggy, and Carol Tenny. 2003. “Configurational Properties of Point of View Roles.” In Asymmetry in Grammar 1, ed. by A. M. Di Sciullo, 315–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Michel. 1978. La grosse femme d’à côté est enceinte. Leméac.Google Scholar
Vecchiato, Sara. 2000. “The ti/tu Interrogative Morpheme in Quebec French.” Generative Grammar in Geneva 1: 141–163.Google Scholar
Vinet, Marie-Thérèse. 2000. “Feature Representation and -tu (pas) in Quebec French.” Studia Linguistica 54 (3): 381–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. D’un français à l’autre: La syntaxe de la microvariation. Montreal: Fides.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Tu as a (Super) Positive Marker in Quebec French.” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory (Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ Groningen, November 2002), ed. by Reineke Bok-Bennema et al., 235–252. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella, and Paul Portner. 2003. “Exclamative Clauses: At the Syntax-Semantics Interface.” Language 79 (1): 39–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Rafaella. 2008. “Encoding the Addressee in Syntax: Evidence from English Imperative Subjects.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26 (1): 185–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar