Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Leuven 2012
Edited by Karen Lahousse and Stefania Marzo
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 6] 2014
► pp. 1–36

Clausal domains and clitic placement generalizations in Romance

Adopting the view that Romance object clitics adjoin to functional heads within the functional structure of clause, this chapter offers a novel approach to object clitic syntax in Romance, which brings together an array of clitic placement patterns across a variety of languages under one system. In order to explain why some “clausal domains” are available for clitic placement in some languages but not others, I examine a unidirectional entailment regarding object clitic syntax in simple and complex predicate clauses, in an understudied group of Italian dialects. The facts suggest that all Romance languages have the same series of functional heads within the clause, and as such, the inability of some varieties to place the clitic in a particular clausal domain cannot be attributed to the idea that some languages or structures are missing the appropriate functional head. Instead, I propose that the languages in question vary with respect to which junctures in the clause “divide” domains; this together with a theory of uninterpretable feature spreading allows us to capture the cross-linguistic patterns.
Published online: 18 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.6.01tor
References (37)
AIS (Atlante Linguistico ed Etnografico dell’Italia e della Svizzera Meridionale (Sprach und Sachatlas Italiens und der Südschweiz)).
ASIt (Atlante Sintattico d’Italia), University of Padua, Department of Linguistics. [URL]
Belletti, Angelo, Ezio Bozzola, Antonio Garzulano, and Alessandro Mainardi. 1984. Gajà spitascià. Grammatica e antologia del dialetto galliatese (Libro I). Novara: La Moderna.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 1990. Generalized Verb Movement. Aspects of Verbal Syntax. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola, and Christina Tortora. 2009. “Towards a finer-grained theory of Italian participial clausal architecture.” University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, Volume 15.1: 17-26.Google Scholar
Biondelli, Bernardino. 1853. Saggio sui dialetti gallo-italici. Dialetti pedemontani (parte terza). Milano: Gius. Bernardoni di Gio.Google Scholar
Blanchette, Frances. 2013. “Negative Concord in English.” Linguistic Variation 13.1: 1-47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Ur Shlonsky. 2004. “Clitic Positions and Restructuring in Italian.” Linguistic Inquiry 35.4:519-557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross LinguisticPerspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. ““Restructuring” and functional structure.” In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures vol. 3, ed. by A. Belletti, 132-191. New York: Oxford University Press. (Reprinted as Chapter 1 in: Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006. Restructuring and Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures vol. 4, 11-63. New York: Oxford University Press.)Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1989. “Null Subjects and Clitic Climbing.” In The Null Subject Parameter, ed. by O. Jaeggli, and K. Safir, 239-261. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. “Romance Clitics, Verb Movement, and PRO.” Linguistic Inquiry 22: 647-686.Google Scholar
. 1993. “Toward a Modular Theory of Auxiliary Selection.” Studia Linguistica 47: 3-31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lana, Lorenza. 1969/1970. Il dialetto di Trecate. Tesi di laurea, Università degli Studi di Milano.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. & Alessandra Lombardi. 2005. V-movement, adverbs, and clitic positions in Romance. Probus 171: 79-113.Google Scholar
Manzini, Rita, and Leonardo Savoia. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa (Vol. II). Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Martins, Ana Maria. 1994. “Enclisis, VP deletion, and the Nature of Sigma.” Probus 6: 173 205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pagani, Giuseppe. 1918. “Il dialetto di Borgomanero.” Rendiconti del Reale Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere II.51: 602-611; 919-949.Google Scholar
Parry, M. 1995. “Some observations on the syntax of clitic pronouns in Piedmontese.” In Linguistic theory and the Romance languages, ed. by M. Maiden, and J.C. Smith, 133-160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parry, Mair. 2005. Sociolinguistica e grammatica del dialetto di Cairo Montenotte. Parluma ’D Còiri. Savona: Società Savonese di Storia Patria.Google Scholar
Poletto, C., and C. Tortora. forthcoming. “Subject Clitics.” In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, ed. by A. Ledgeway, and M. Maiden,Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Some notes on Romance cliticization.” Ch. 4 in Comparative Syntax and Language Acquisition. Routledge.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1968. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Morfologia. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Rusconi, Antonio. 1878. I parlari del Novarese e della Lomellina. Novara: Tipografia Rusconi.Google Scholar
Salvioni, S.C. Carlo. 1903. “Del pronome enclitico oggetto suffisso ad altri elementi che non sieno la voce verbale.” Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo (seria seconda) 37: 1012-1021.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur. 2004. “Enclisis and Proclisis.” In The Structure of CP and IP (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 2), ed. by L. Rizzi,New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tonetti, Federico. 1894. Dizionario del dialetto valsesiano. Varallo: Tipografia Camaschella e Zanfa.Google Scholar
Tortora, Christina. 2000. “Functional Heads and Object Clitics.” In Proceedings of the 30th Meeting of the Northeast Linguistics Society (NELS30) V. 2, ed. by M. Hirotani, A. Coetzee, N. Hall, and J.-Y. Kim, 639-653.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Romance Enclisis, Prepositions, and Aspect.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20.4: 725-757. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Domains of clitic placement in finite and non-finite clauses: Evidence from a Piedmontese dialect.” In Syntactic Variation: The Dialects of Italy, ed. by Roberta D’Alessandro, A. Ledgeway, and I. Roberts, 135-149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2014. A Comparative Grammar of Borgomanerese (In the Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax Series). New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuttle, Edward. 1992. “Del pronome d’oggetto suffisso al sintagma verbale. In calce ad una nota salvioniana del 1903.” L’Italia Dialettale 55: 13-63.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. “Aspects of the Syntax of Clitic Placement in Romance.” Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79 123.Google Scholar
Wanner, Dieter. 1983. “Intorno alla sintassi pronominale alpina.” In Problemi linguistici nel mondo alpino, ed. by Renato Martinotti, and Vittorio F. Raschèr, 169-185. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, R. 1997. Negation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Benincà, Paola & Guglielmo Cinque
2024. The syntax of Romance clitics and selective clitic climbing. In Rich Descriptions and Simple Explanations in Morphosyntax and Language Acquisition, ► pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Dragomirescu, Adina & Alexandru Nicolae
2020. From Motion to Desire: The Grammaticalization of a Change of Location Unaccusative Construction in Romanian. Probus 32:2 ► pp. 303 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.