Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Leuven 2012
Edited by Karen Lahousse and Stefania Marzo
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 6] 2014
► pp. 37–64

Spanish VSX

This paper addresses the question of why VSX word order is possible in Spanish but excluded in other Romance languages (Catalan and Italian). It aims at offering an overview of the properties of VSX in Spanish, as well as explaining how the availability of VSX depends on interface requirements on the mapping between syntactic structure and information structure. VSX is interpreted as a single informational unit, without internal partitions (topic-comment, focus-background); this typically results in a thetic, wide focus interpretation, related to a stage topic. Languages like Italian and Catalan reject the processing of marked orders as non-partitioned units, which rules out VSX. More permissive languages, like Spanish, allow for the absence of partitions in marked orders.
Published online: 18 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.6.02leo
References (56)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2000. “Some Remarks on Word Order and Information Structure in Romance and Greek.” ZAS Papers in Linguistics 20: 119-136.Google Scholar
. 2006. “On the Properties of VSO and VOS orders in Greek and Italian: a Study on the Syntax – Information Structure Interface.” Proceedings of ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics , Athens (Greece).
Belletti, Adriana. 2001. “Inversion as Focalization.” In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, ed. by Aafke Hulk, and Jean-Yves Pollock, 20-59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Aspects of the Low IP Area.” In Structures and Strategies, 161-191. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 1988. “L’ ordine degli elementi della frase e le costruzioni marcate.” In Grande Grammatica Italiana di Consultazione, vol. I., ed. by Lorenzo Renzi, and Giampaolo Salvi, 129-194. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 2010. “Towards a Typology of Focus Realization.” In Information Structure. Theoretical, Typological and Experimental Perspectives, ed. by Malte Zimmermann, and Caroline Féry, 177-205. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Contreras, Heles. 1983. El orden de palabras en español. Madrid: Cátedra.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Word Order and Minimalism.” In Romance Linguistics 2007, ed. by Pascual Masullo, et al., 69-87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, João. 1999. Review of Word Order and Clausal Structure in Spanish and other Romance Languages . GLOT International 4: 19-22.Google Scholar
. 2004. Subject Positions and Interfaces: the case of European Portuguese. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio. 2011. Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The Dynamics of Focus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2008. “In Need of Mediation: the Relation between Syntax and Information Structure.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55 (3-4): 1-17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, Ines, et al. 2010. “Subject Focus in West African Languages.” In Information Structure. Theoretical, Typological and Experimental Perspectives, ed. by Malte Zimmermann, and Caroline Féry, 234-257. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara. 2000. The Syntax-Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Ángel. 2007. “Defectivitat morfològica i variació sintàctica.” Caplletra 42: 219-250.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Phases and Variation: Exploring the Second Factor of the Faculty of Language.” In Alternatives to Cartography, ed. by Jeroen van Craenenbroek, 109-152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. “Object Shift in Romance.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 409-451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giurgea, Ion, and Eva Maria Remberger. 2012. “Left Peripheral Interactions in Romance and the Syntactic Representation of Information-Structural Features.” Unpublished paper.
Gundel, Jeanette. 1974. The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin. Published by Garland, 1988.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Bravo, Rodrigo. 2007. “Prominence Scales and Unmarked Word Order in Spanish.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 235-271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim. 1999. “Informational Autonomy.” In Focus, ed. by Peter Bosch and Rob van der Sandt, 56-81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kechagias, Axiotis. 2011. Regulating Word Order in Modern Greek: Verb-Initial and Non-Verb-Initial Orders and the Conceptual – Intentional Interface. PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Rebecca. 1999. “Focus Constituency.” Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1203-1230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lahousse, Karen. 2008. “Implicit Stage Topics in French: a Case Study.” Discours (e) 1. ([URL])Google Scholar
. 2011. Quand passent les cigognes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Lahousse, Karen, and Beatrice Lamiroy. 2012. “Word Order in French, Spanish and Italian: a Grammaticalization Account.” Folia Linguistica 46(2): 1-29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel. 2010. “La expresión de la estructura informativa en la sintaxis: un parámetro de variación en las lenguas románicas.” Romanistiches Jahrbuch 61: 338-355.Google Scholar
. 2013. “Variation in Informational Partitions in Romance.” Unpublished.
Leonetti, Manuel, and Victoria Escandell-Vidal. 2009. “Fronting and Verum Focus in Spanish.” In Focus and Background in Romance Languages, ed. by Andreas Dufter, and Daniel Jacob, 155-204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mensching, Guido, and Anja Weingart. 2011. “The Null Subject Parameter and the Lexicon in Minimalist Syntax.” Paper presented at the Workshop ‘Formal Grammar and Syntactic Variation. Rethinking Parameters’, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Neeleman, A., and Hans van de Koot. 2008. “The Nature of Discourse Templates.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 11: 137-189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco. 1998. “Postverbal Asymmetries in Spanish.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16.2: 313-346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “Focus and Subject Inversion in Romance.” In Advances in Hispanic Linguistics, volume 2, ed. by Javier Gutiérrez Rexach, and Fernando Martínez Gil, 502-518. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
. 2007a. “Observacions sobre la posiciò dels subjectes postverbals en català i castellà.” Caplletra 42: 251-272.Google Scholar
. 2007b. “Cartography of Postverbal Subjects in Spanish and Catalan.” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2005: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’, ed. by Sergio Bauuw, Frank Drijkoningen, and Manuela Pinto, 259-280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinto, María. 1999. “Information Focus: Between Core and Periphery.” In Semantic Issues in Romance Syntax, ed. by Esthela Treviño, and José Lema, 179-191. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface Strategies. Optimal and Costly Computations. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 2010. Uttering Trees. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sæbø, Kjell Johann. 2007. “Focus Interpretation in Thetic Statements: Alternative Semantics and OT Pragmatics.” Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16: 15-33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1996. “Theticity”. Arbeitspapier 27, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Köln.
Sheehan, Michelle. 2006. The EPP and Null Subjects in Romance. Doctoral dissertation, University of Newcastle.Google Scholar
. 2010. “‘Free’ Inversion in Romance and the Null Subject Parameter.” In Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, ed. by Theresa Biberauer, et al., 231-262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros, and Gisbert Fanselow. 2010. “Focus Types and Argument Asymmetries.” In Comparative and Contrastive Studies of Information Structure, ed. by Carsten Breul, and Edward Göbbel, 169-197. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soare, Gabriela. 2009. The Syntax – Information Structure Interface: a Comparative View from Romanian. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Tortora, Christina. 1999. “The Postverbal Subject Position of Italian Unaccusative Verbs of Inherently Directed Motion.” In Semantic Issues in Romance Syntax, ed. by Esthela Treviño, and José Lema, 283-298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vallduví, Enric. 1992. The Informational Component. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
. 1994. “Detachment in Catalan and Information Packaging.” Journal of Pragmatics 22: 573-601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. “Structural Properties of Information Packaging in Catalan.” In Discourse Configurational Languages, ed. by K.E. Kiss, 122-152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vanrell, Maria del Mar, and Olga Fernández Soriano. 2013. “Variation at the Interfaces in Ibero-Romance. Catalan and Spanish Prosody and Word Order.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 12: 253-282.Google Scholar
Vallduví, Enric. 2002. “L’ oració com a unitat informativa.” In Gramàtica del català contemporani, ed. by Joan Solà et al., 1221-1279. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
Villalba, Xavier. 2011. “A Quantitative Comparative Study of Right-Dislocation in Catalan and Spanish.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1946-1961. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, María Luisa. 1998. Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge (Mass): MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. “Las funciones informativas: Tema y foco.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, vol. 3, ed. by Ignacio Bosque, and Violeta Demonte, 4215-4244. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
. 2009. “The Left Edge in the Spanish Clausal Structure.” In Romance Linguistics 2007, ed. by Pascual Masullo, et al., 339-357. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “A Note on the Spanish Left Periphery.” In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 7, ed. by Laura Brugè et al., 112-125. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Escandell-Vidal, Victoria & Manuel Leonetti
2014. Chapter 11. Fronting and irony in Spanish. In Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 214], ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.