Abels, Klaus
2012Phases: an Essay on Cyclicity in Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef
1995The Syntax of Interpretation. Ph.D. diss., University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana, and Luigi Rizzi
2012. “Moving Verbal Chunks in the Low Functional Field.” In Functional Heads, ed. by Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro and Cecilia Poletto, 129-137. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, and Ian Roberts
2005"“Changing EPP Parameters in the History of English.” English Language and Linguistics 9: 5-46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg and Ian Roberts
2014“A Syntactic Universal and its Consequences.” Linguistic Inquiry 45: 169-225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunet, Etienne, and Sylvie Mellet
n.d. Hyperbase, version 5.5: textes latins. Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis.
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2005“Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its Exceptions.” Linguistic Inquiry 36: 315-332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danckaert, Lieven
2012Latin Embedded Clauses: The Left Periphery. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013“The Decline of Latin VOAux: Neg-incorporation and Syntactic Reanalysis.” Under review.
Hinterhölzl, Roland
2009“A Phase-based Comparative Approach to Modification and Word Order in Germanic.” Syntax 12: 242-284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004“Antisymmetry and Japanese.” In Variation and Universals in Biolinguistics, ed. by Lyle Jenkins, 3-37. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2011“Why are there no Directionality Parameters?” West Coast Conference in Formal Linguistics 28: 1-23.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda
1984The Syntax of verbs: From Verb Movement Rules in the Kru Languages to Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda, and Anna Szabolcsi
2000Verbal Complexes. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard
1988“On the Double Object Construction.” Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335-391.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2012From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic Typology and Change. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lema, José, and María-Luisa Rivero
1989“Long Head Movement: ECP vs. HMC.” North East Linguistic Society 20: 333-347.Google Scholar
Rivero, María-Luisa
1991“Long Head Movement and Negation: Serbo-Croatian vs. Slovak and Czech.” The Linguistic Review 8: 319-351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993“Long Head Movement vs. V2, and Null Subjects in Old Romance.” Lingua 89: 217-245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990Relativized Minimality. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim
1981Origins of Phrase Structure. Ph.D. diss. MIT.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann and Susan Pintzuk
2011“The Interaction of Syntactic Change and Information Status Effects in the Change from OV to VO in English.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 71-94.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa
1984Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. Ph.D. diss. MIT.Google Scholar
2005“VP-, D° Movement Languages.” In Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics, ed. by Raffaella Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger and Paul Portner, 127-147. Washington (DC): Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susanne
2006“Verb Clusters, Verb Raising, and Restructuring.” In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ed. by Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, vol. 5, 229-343. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella
1997Negation and Clausal Structure. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Eric Mathieu & Robert Truswell
2017. Micro-change and Macro-change in Diachronic Syntax, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.