‘Rippled’ low topics
A phonological approach to postfocal topics in Italian
This paper is concerned with low topics in the sentential left periphery. It builds on two main assumptions: (1) postfocal material is right-dislocated (Samek-Lodovici 2006); (2) fronted focus in Italian triggers a phonological process called ‘ripple effect of focus’ (Zubizarreta 2010). First, I will provide experimental evidence in favor of the second assumption and I will claim that a syntactic account of low topics is not tenable. Then, I will show that the free word order exhibited by postfocal constituents and the occurrence of low topics arise as side effects of the ripple effect of focus. This line of investigation argues in favor of a prosodic account of the phenomena at stake.
References (39)
References
Benincá, Paola, and Cecilia Poletto. 2004. “Topic, Focus, and V2. Defining the CP Sublayers.” In The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 2, ed. by L. Rizzi, 52-72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bianchi, Valentina. 2012. “On focus movement in Italian.” In Information Structure and Agreement, ed. by M.V. Camacho-Taboada, A. Jiménez Fernández, J. Martín-Gonzáles, and M. Reyes-Tejedor, 193-216. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bianchi, Valentina, and Mara Frascarelli. 2010. “Is Topic a Root Phenomenon?” Iberia 2 (1): 43-88.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bocci, Giuliano, and Cinzia Avesani. 2011. “Phrasal prominences do not need pitch movements: postfocal phrasal heads in Italian.” In
Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2011
, Florence, Italy, August 27-31 2011.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boersma, Paul, and David Weenink. 2009. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1). [URL] (14 July 2010).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cecchetto, Carlo. 2000. ‘Doubling Structures and Reconstruction.’ Probus 12 (1): 93-126. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. ‘‘A null theory of phrase and compound stress.’’ Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239-297.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Costa, João. 2004. Subject Positions and Interfaces: The Case of European Portuguese. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cruschina, Silvio. 2012. Discourse-related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dalcher Villafaña, Christina. 2006. “Consonant Weakening in Florentine Italian. An acoustic study of gradient and variable sound change.” Doctoral Dissertation, Georgetown University.
Ferreira, Fernanda. 1993. “Creation of prosody during sentence production.’’ Psychological Review 100 (2): 233-253. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frascarelli, Mara. 2000. The Syntax-Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ghini, Marco. 1993. “ϕ-formation in Italian: A new proposal.” Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 41-77.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giannelli, Luciano, and Leonardo M. Savoia. 1978. “L’indebolimento consonantico in Toscana.” Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 2: 25-58.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Göbbel, Edward. 2013. “Extraposition of relative clauses: Phonological solutions.” Lingua 136: 77-102. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gussenhoven, Carlos, and Toni Rietveld. 1992. “Intonation contours, prosodic structure and pre-boundary lengthening.” Journal of Phonetics 20: 283-303.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane. 2004. ‘‘Topicalization, CLLD and the left periphery.’’ In ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35: Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop, ed. by Claudia Maienborn, Werner Frey, and Benjamin Shaer, 157-192. Berlin: ZAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hinterhölzl, Roland, and Diana Pili. 2004. “Argument shift across language types.” In Proceedings of the XXVIII IGG, ed. P. Bottari. Lecce: Congedo Editore.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jun, Sun-Ah. 2005. “Prosodic Typology.” In Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, ed. by Sun-Ah Jun, 430-457. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kanerva, Jonni. 1990. “Focusing on phonological phrases in Chichewa.” In The Phonology-Syntax Connection, ed. by Sharon Inkelas, and Draga Zec, 145–161. Chicago: The University Of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiss, Katalin É. 2010. “Is free postverbal order in Hungarian a syntactic or a PF phenomenon?” In The Sound Patterns of Syntax, ed. by Nomi Erteschik-Shir, and Lisa Rochman, 53-71. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neeleman, Ad, and Hans van de Koot. 2008. “Dutch scrambling and the nature of discourse templates.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 11: 137-189. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nespor, Marina, and Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. ‘‘The fine structure of the left-periphery.” In Elements of Grammar, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross, John R. 1967. “Constraints on variables in syntax.” Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2006. “When right dislocation meets the left periphery. A unified analysis of Italian non-final focus.” Lingua 116: 836-873. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sandalo, Filomena, and Hubert Truckenbrodt. 2002. “Some notes on phonological phrasing in Brazilian Poroguese.” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 42: 285-310.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 1984. Phonology and syntax: the relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elizabeth. 2000. “The interaction of constraints on prosodic phrasing.” In Prosody: Theory and experiment. Studies presented to Gosta Bruce, ed. by M. Horne, 231-261. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkrik, Elizabeth. 2005. “Comments on Intonational Phrasing in English.” In Prosodies, ed. by S. Frota, M. Vigario, and M.J. Freitas, 11-58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szendröi, Kriszta. 2002. “Stress-focus correspondence in Italian.” In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2000, ed. by C. Beyssade, R. Bok-Bennema, F. Drijkoningen and P. Monachesi, 287-303. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szendröi, Kriszta. 2003. “A stress-based approach to the syntax of Hungarian focus.” The Linguistic Review 20(1): 37-78. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Torregrossa, Jacopo. 2012. “Encoding topic, focus and contrast: Informational notions at the interfaces.” Doctoral Dissertation, University of Verona.
Torregrossa, Jacopo. Under review. “Postfocal Topics in Italian and Spanish: A Phonological Account.”
Vallduví, Eric. 1992. The Informational Component. New York: Garland Publishing Inc.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Focus, Prosody and Word Order. Cambridge: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 2010. ‘‘The Syntax and Prosody of Focus: The Bantu-Italian Connection.” Iberia 2 (1): 131-168.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Cruschina, Silvio
2022.
Topicalization, Dislocation and Clitic Resumption.
Studia Linguistica 76:2
► pp. 354 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.