Part of
Romance Linguistics 2012: Selected papers from the 42nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Cedar City, Utah, 20-22 April 2012Edited by Jason Smith and Tabea Ihsane
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 7] 2015
► pp. 17–28
Edited by Jason Smith and Tabea Ihsane
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 7] 2015
► pp. 17–28
Acquiring VP-ellipsis in Brazilian Portuguese
Evidence from a comprehension study
Do children recognize VP-ellipsis and know its identification restrictions when allowed the necessary conditions to offer a non-adult interpretation? We have applied a Truth Value Judgement Task (TVJT) consisting of three characters sentences: A who did something to B and C who also did something to B. Our null hypothesis sustains that the elided VP is not restricted by its antecedent. If that is true, we expect children’s grammar acquiring VP-ellipsis languages to be broader than the target. Thirty 4- to 6-year-old children were tested with one matching condition (the adult-like interpretation) and five mismatch ones, all false under the adult interpretation. Our results show that children perform at ceiling in the matching condition, but display an average of 26% of non-adult responses in the mismatching conditions. Our results also show that there is an age effect. The 4-year-olds accept 42% of the non-adult interpretations while this figure drops to 20.5% for the 5-year-olds and to 8% for the 6-year-olds.
References (17)
Barss, Andy, ed. 2003. Anaphora. A Reference Guide. Oxford: Blackwell.
Crain, Stephen & Rosalind Thornton. 1998. Investigations in Universal Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Cyrino, Sonia. 1994. O Objeto Nulo no Português do Brasil. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Campinas.
Cyrino, Sonia & Gabriela Matos. 2002. “VP Ellipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese: A Comparative Analysis”. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1:2.177–195. 
. 2005. “Local Licensers and Recovering in VP Ellipsis”. Portuguese Journal of Linguistics 4:2.79–112.
Grodzinsky, Yosef. 2005. “Ellipsis in Deficient Language Users: Parallels (and Divergences) in Parallelism”. Plenary talk given at GALA 2005, University of Siena.
Hankamer, Jorge & Ivan Sag. 1976. “Deep and Surface Anaphora”. Linguistic Inquiry 7:3. 391–426.
Hardt, Daniel. 1993. VP ellipsis, form, meaning and processing. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Johnson, Kyle. 2004. “How to be quiet”.
Proceedings from the 40th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society
ed. by Nikki Adams, Adam Cooper, Fey Parrill & Thomas Wier, 1–20.
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The Syntax of Silence. Sluicing, Islands and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2004. “Fragments and Ellipsis”. Linguistics and Philosophy 27.661–738.
Postman, Whitney, Claire Foley, Lynn Santelmann & Barbara Lust. 1997. “Evidence for Strong Continuity: New Experimental Results from Children’s Acquisition of VP-ellipsis and Bound Variable Structures”. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 31.327–44.
Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing and Identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lopes, Ruth E.V. 2009. “Aspect and the Acquisition of Null Objects in Brazilian Portuguese”. Minimalist Inquiries into Child and Adult Language Acquisition ed. by Jason Rothman & Acrisio Pires. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rouveret, A. 2012. “VP ellipsis, phases and the syntax of morphology”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30.897–963.
Santos, Ana Lúcia. 2009. “Early VP Ellipsis: Production and Comprehension Evidence”. Minimalist Inquiries into Child and Adult Language Acquisition ed. by Jason Rothman & Acrisio Pires. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Thornton, Rosalind & Kenneth Wexler. 1999. Principle B, VP Ellipsis and Interpretation in Child Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.