Cover not available
Part of
Romance Linguistics 2012: Selected papers from the 42nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Cedar City, Utah, 20-22 April 2012
Edited by Jason Smith and Tabea Ihsane
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 7] 2015
► pp. 275–288

A case of multiple agree

Accusative, not dative, indirect object se

This paper attempts to explain why indirect objects and aspectual se in Spanish are ungrammatical in the periphrastic passive. The claim is that se is accusative and since accusative is not available in passive, these se are ungrammatical in passive. An appeal to parallel patterns by indirect object la of laísta dialects of Spain, which is overtly accusative, lends support to this approach. The technical account of accusative case on indirect object se relies on Multiple Agree with v. The Multiple Agree account generates concrete predictions regarding (non-) intervention effects with ethical, benefactive and alienable possessor datives. These predictions are tested and the results are positive, supplying support to the overall analysis.
Published online: 28 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.7.18mac
References (31)
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2005. “Strong and Weak Person Restrictions. A Feature Checking Analysis”. Clitics and Affix Combinations: Theoretical Perspectives ed. by Lorie Heggie & Francisco Ordoñez. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Grant. 2011. Two classes of transitive verbs: Evidence from Spanish. Ph.D. dissertation, U. Georgetown.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2008. Aspects of the syntax of Agreement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulalia. 1991. Morphology after syntax: pronominal clitics in Romance. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Bosse, Solveig, Benjamin Bruening & Masahiro Yamada. 2012. “Affected experiencers”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30:4.1185–1230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Minimalist inquiries: The framework”. Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka, 89–156. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Derivation by phase”. Ken Hale: A life in language ed. by Michael Kenstowicz. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Beyond explanatory adequacy”. Structures and beyond – the cartography of syntactic structure (Vol. 3) ed. by Adriana Belletti, 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cuervo, Maria. 2003. Datives at large. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Demonte, Violeta. 1995. “Dative Alternation in Spanish”. Probus 7.5–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 2006. “The SE-Anaphor and its Role in Argument Realization”. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (Vol. 4) ed. by Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk, 118–179. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dumitrescu, Domnita. 1990. “El dative posesivo en el español y en rumano”. Revistsa Española de Lingüística 20:2.403–430.Google Scholar
Fernández-Ordónez, Inés. 1994. “Isoglosas internas del castellano. El sistema referencial del pronombre átono de tercera persona”. Revista de Filología Española, LXXIV, 71–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo”. Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española (Vol. 1) ed. by Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte, 1317–1397. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Ordóñez, Salvador. 1999. “Los dativos”. Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española(Vol. 2) ed. by Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte, 1855–1930. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2001. “Multiple agree and the defective intervention constraint in Japanese”. The Proceedings of the MIT-Harvard joint conference (HUMIT 2000), MITWPL 40 ed. by Ora Matushansky, 67–80. Cambridge, Mass.: MITWPL.Google Scholar
. 2005. Dimensions of symmetry in syntax: Agreement and clausal architecture. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Kayne, Richard. 1975. French Syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 1999. “Possessor raising and the structure of VP”. Lingua 107.1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Jonathan E. 2004. “Spanish Reflexive Pronouns: a Null Preposition Hypothesis”. Proceedings of WCCFL 23 ed. by Gina Garding & Mimu Tsujimura. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Null Directional Prepositions in Romanian and Spanish”. New Perspectives in Romance Linguistics Vol. 1: Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics. Selected Papers from the 35th Linguistics Symposium on Romance Linguistics. ed. by Jean-Pierre Montreuil & Chiyo Nishida, 169–185. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2007. “The Representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25.273–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ormazabal, Javier & Juan Romero. 2007. “The object agreement constraint”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25.315–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romero, Juan. 2013. “Accusative feminine datives”. Variation in datives: A micro-comparative perspective ed. by Beatriz Fernández & Ricardo Etxepare, 283–300. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. “On Chain Formation”. The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics ed. by Hagit Borer, 65–95. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna. 1983. “The possessor that ran away from home”. The Linguistic Review 3:1.89–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vann, Robert. 1994. “Middle voice, ‘no fault’ se, and the anticausative: Ergativity in Spanish”. Issues and Theory in Romance Linguistics ed. by Michael Mazzola, 493–508. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Armstrong, Grant & Paula Kempchinsky
2021. Causative SE: A Transitive Analysis. In Unraveling the complexity of SE [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 99], ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
MacDonald, Jonathan E. & Jeriel Melgares
2021. On (Un)Grammatical Clitic Sequences in Impersonal se Constructions. In Unraveling the complexity of SE [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 99], ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Dobrovie‐Sorin, Carmen
2017. Reflexive Marking in Romance: Voice and Feature Deficiency. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.