In this paper we investigate the essential semantic and pragmatic features associated with Focus Fronting (FF) in Italian, with the ultimate aim of identifying the actual trigger of this syntactic operation. After introducing the different contexts that could in principle be compatible with FF, we present the results of a syntactic experiment which show that FF is possible in corrective and mirative contexts, but not in merely contrastive contexts. This distribution proves that, contrary to claims that are dominant in the literature, contrast and/or givenness of the background are not necessary conditions for Italian FF. Our second experiment highlights a systematic prosodic difference between the two focus types, showing that the corrective and mirative interpretations are grammatically distinct. We claim that these special interpretations associated with FF are conventional implicatures which are syntactically encoded and which trigger syntactic fronting.
Baayen, R.H. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beaver, David, and Brady Clark. 2008. Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bianchi, Valentina. 2013. “On focus movement in Italian.” In Information Structure and Agreement, ed. by María Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-Gonzáles, and Mariano Reyes-Tejedor, 193–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bianchi, Valentina, and Giuliano Bocci. 2012. “Should I Stay or Should I Go? Optional Focus Movement in Italian.” In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9, ed. by Christopher Piñon, 1–18. Available online at <[URL]>.
Bianchi, Valentina, Giuliano Bocci, and Silvio Cruschina. 2015. “Focus Fronting, Unexpectedness, and Evaluative Implicatures.” To appear in Semantics & Pragmatics.
Bobaljik, Jonathan, and Susi Wurmbrand. 2012. “Word Order and Scope: Transparent Interfaces and the 3/4 Signature.” Linguistic Inquiry 43 (3): 371–421.
Brunetti, Lisa. 2004. A Unification of Focus. Padua: Unipress.
Cruschina, Silvio. 2012. Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. “Mirativity: The Grammatical Marking of Unexpected Information.” Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52.
Fanselow, Gisbert, and Denisa Lenertová. 2011. “Left Peripheral Focus: Mismatches between Syntax and Information Structure.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29: 169–209.
Farkas, Donka, and Kim B. Bruce. 2010. “On Reacting to Assertions and Polar Questions.” Journal of Semantics 27: 81–118.
Féry, Caroline, and Vieri Samek-Lodovici. 2006. “Focus Projection and Prosodic Prominence in Nested Foci.” Language 82: 131–150.
Frey, Werner. 2010. “A'-Movement and Conventional Implicatures: About the Grammatical Encoding of Emphasis in German.” Lingua 120 (6): 1416–1435.
Grosz, Patrick. 2011. On the Grammar of Optative Constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2012. “The Notional Category of Modality.” In Modals and Conditionals. New and Revised Perspectives, 27–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krifka, Manfred. 2007. “Basic Notions of Information Structure.” In The Notions of Information Structure [Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6], ed. by Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow, and Manfred Krifka, 13–55. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Potts, Christopher. 2007. “Conventional Implicatures, a Distinguished Class of Meanings.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, ed. by Gillian Ramchand, and Charles Reiss, 475–501. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rizzi, Luigi1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In Elements of grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2006. “On the Form of Chains: Criterial Positions and ECP Effects.” In Wh-Movement. Moving On, ed. by Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, and Norbert Corver, 97–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rooth, Mats. 1992. “A Theory of Focus Interpretation.” Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2006. “When Right Dislocation Meets the Left-periphery: A Unified Analysis of Italian Non-final Focus.” Lingua 116: 836–873.
van Leusen, Noor. 2004. “Incompatibility in Context: A Diagnosis of Correction.” Journal of Semantics 21: 415–442.
Zimmermann, Malte. 2007. “Contrastive Focus.” In The Notions of Information Structure [Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6], ed. by Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow, and Manfred Krifka, 147–159. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Jaque, Matías, Carlos González, Verónica Orqueda, Silvana Guerrero, Felipe Hasler & Magdalena Covarrubias
2022. A la altura de las expectativas: interacciones entre la negación y construcciones multiverbales del tipo llegar y + VF. Verba: Anuario Galego de Filoloxía► pp. 1 ff.
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. & Mercedes Tubino-Blanco
2022. Note su infiniti flessi in chianino: un approccio cartografico. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale :56
Wang, Yuyun Iris & Wei‐wen Roger Liao
2021. Against the Low Periphery as Phrase Markers: Two Types of Contrastive Dislocations in Mandarin Chinese*. Studia Linguistica 75:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
De Cia, Simone
2020. Apparent wh-in-situ in Bellunese: Microparametric variation in the locus of subject clitic inversion. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1
2019. Topic chains and the interpretation of null subjects. The acquisition of discourse-related strategies in Italian children. The Linguistic Review 36:4 ► pp. 637 ff.
Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi
2017. On the Syntax and Pragmatics of Some Clause-Peripheral Positions. In Formal Models in the Study of Language, ► pp. 33 ff.
Castroviejo, Elena, Olga Fernández-Soriano & Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.