In this paper we investigate the essential semantic and pragmatic features associated with Focus Fronting (FF) in Italian, with the ultimate aim of identifying the actual trigger of this syntactic operation. After introducing the different contexts that could in principle be compatible with FF, we present the results of a syntactic experiment which show that FF is possible in corrective and mirative contexts, but not in merely contrastive contexts. This distribution proves that, contrary to claims that are dominant in the literature, contrast and/or givenness of the background are not necessary conditions for Italian FF. Our second experiment highlights a systematic prosodic difference between the two focus types, showing that the corrective and mirative interpretations are grammatically distinct. We claim that these special interpretations associated with FF are conventional implicatures which are syntactically encoded and which trigger syntactic fronting.
2008Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beaver, David, and Brady Clark
2008Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bianchi, Valentina
2013 “On focus movement in Italian.” In Information Structure and Agreement, ed. by María Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-Gonzáles, and Mariano Reyes-Tejedor, 193–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bianchi, Valentina, and Giuliano Bocci
2012 “Should I Stay or Should I Go? Optional Focus Movement in Italian.” In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9, ed. by Christopher Piñon, 1–18. Available online at [URL].
Bianchi, Valentina, Giuliano Bocci, and Silvio Cruschina
2015 “Focus Fronting, Unexpectedness, and Evaluative Implicatures.” To appear in Semantics & Pragmatics.
Bobaljik, Jonathan, and Susi Wurmbrand
2012 “Word Order and Scope: Transparent Interfaces and the 3/4 Signature.” Linguistic Inquiry 43 (3): 371–421.
2012Discourse-Related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DeLancey, Scott
1997 “Mirativity: The Grammatical Marking of Unexpected Information.” Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52.
Fanselow, Gisbert, and Denisa Lenertová
2011 “Left Peripheral Focus: Mismatches between Syntax and Information Structure.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29: 169–209.
Farkas, Donka, and Kim B. Bruce
2010 “On Reacting to Assertions and Polar Questions.” Journal of Semantics 27: 81–118.
Féry, Caroline, and Vieri Samek-Lodovici
2006 “Focus Projection and Prosodic Prominence in Nested Foci.” Language 82: 131–150.
Frey, Werner
2010 “A'-Movement and Conventional Implicatures: About the Grammatical Encoding of Emphasis in German.” Lingua 120 (6): 1416–1435.
Grosz, Patrick
2011On the Grammar of Optative Constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Kratzer, Angelika
2012 “The Notional Category of Modality.” In Modals and Conditionals. New and Revised Perspectives, 27–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krifka, Manfred
2007 “Basic Notions of Information Structure.” In The Notions of Information Structure [Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6], ed. by Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow, and Manfred Krifka, 13–55. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Potts, Christopher
2005The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Potts, Christopher
2007 “Conventional Implicatures, a Distinguished Class of Meanings.” In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, ed. by Gillian Ramchand, and Charles Reiss, 475–501. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In Elements of grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rizzi, Luigi
2006 “On the Form of Chains: Criterial Positions and ECP Effects.” In Wh-Movement. Moving On, ed. by Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng, and Norbert Corver, 97–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rooth, Mats
1992 “A Theory of Focus Interpretation.” Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri
2006 “When Right Dislocation Meets the Left-periphery: A Unified Analysis of Italian Non-final Focus.” Lingua 116: 836–873.
van Leusen, Noor
2004 “Incompatibility in Context: A Diagnosis of Correction.” Journal of Semantics 21: 415–442.
Zimmermann, Malte
2007 “Contrastive Focus.” In The Notions of Information Structure [Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6], ed. by Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow, and Manfred Krifka, 147–159. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Cited by
Cited by 34 other publications
Belletti, Adriana & Luigi Rizzi
2017. On the Syntax and Pragmatics of Some Clause-Peripheral Positions. In Formal Models in the Study of Language, ► pp. 33 ff.
Beltrama, Andrea & Andreas Trotzke
2019. Conveying emphasis for intensity: Lexical and syntactic strategies. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:7
Beltrame, Francesco & Cristiano Chesi
2021. Why-questions and focus in Italian. The Linguistic Review 38:4 ► pp. 687 ff.
2020. Apparent wh-in-situ in Bellunese: Microparametric variation in the locus of subject clitic inversion. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1
Frascarelli, Mara & Giorgio Carella
2019. Topic chains and the interpretation of null subjects. The acquisition of discourse-related strategies in Italian children. The Linguistic Review 36:4 ► pp. 637 ff.
Jaque, Matías, Carlos González, Verónica Orqueda, Silvana Guerrero, Felipe Hasler & Magdalena Covarrubias
2022. A la altura de las expectativas: interacciones entre la negación y construcciones multiverbales del tipo llegar y + VF. Verba: Anuario Galego de Filoloxía► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.