Cover not available
Part of
Romance Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New York, 17-19 April, 2013
Edited by Christina Tortora, Marcel den Dikken, Ignacio L. Montoya and Teresa O'Neill
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 9] 2016
► pp. 39–58

The generalization of preposition para via fusion and ensuing loss of compositionality

 | Pennsylvania State University
ORCID logo | Pennsylvania State University
This study traces two shifts in the distribution of the Spanish preposition para ‘for, in order to’: first, a drop in its allative uses and second, its replacement of the older preposition por ‘for’ with purposive infinitives. These distributional changes of the innovative para—across its own contexts of occurrence as well as in its variation with the older por—demonstrate the crosslinguistic allative-to-purposive grammaticalization path. Frequent co-occurrence of the source elements, por and a, foments their coalescence, reflected in changes in the orthographic/phonological form of the fused preposition as it loses structural analyzability. Semantic compositionality, whereby there was a discernable semantic contribution of the allative a component, is also lost as early prepositional objects designating persons decline. We find this account of the rise of para, based on gradual loss of analyzability and compositionality, to be more compatible with the quantitative patterns and insightful than an opaque and implicitly abrupt notion of reanalysis.
Published online: 3 February 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.9.03bau
References (43)
Corpus of texts (in chronological order, except for DLNE)
[Cid] Anonymous, Cantar de mio Cid. Texto, gramática y vocabulario, volume 3: Texto, paleographic edition of Ramón Menéndez Pidal. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, 1944-1945.Google Scholar
[Calila] Anonymous, Calila e Dimna, edition of Juan Manuel Cacho Blecua and María Jesús Lacarra. Madrid: Castalia, 1984.Google Scholar
[GEI] Alfonso X, General estoria. Primera parte, edition of Lloyd Kasten, John Nitti and Wilhelmina Jonxis-Henkemans, The Electronic Texts and Concordances of the Prose Works of Alfonso X, El Sabio. Madison: Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies, 1997.Google Scholar
[Zifar] Anonymous, El libro del cavallero Zifar, edition of Charles Ph. Wagner. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1929.Google Scholar
[ Lucanor ] Don Juan Manuel, El conde Lucanor o Libro de los enxiemplos del conde Lucanor et de Patronio, edition of José Manuel Blecua. Madrid: Castalia, 1969/1971.Google Scholar
[ Corbacho ] Alfonso Martínez de Toledo, Arcipreste de Talavera o Corbacho, edition of Michael Gerli. Madrid: Cátedra, 1979/1992.
[ Celestina ] Fernando de Rojas, La Celestina, edition of Dorothy S. Severin. Madrid: Cátedra, 1993.Google Scholar
[LT] Anónimo, Tri-linear edition of Lazarillo de Tormes of 1554 (Burgos, Alcalá de Henares, Amberes), edition of Joseph V. Ricapito. Madison: The Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies, 1987.Google Scholar
[ Quijote ] Miguel de Cervantes, Don Quijote de la Mancha, in Obras completas, volume 2, edition of Francisco Sevilla Arroyo and Antonio Rey Hazas. Madrid: Alianza Editorial-Centro de Estudios Cervantinos, 1996.Google Scholar
[CN/Sí ] Leandro Fernández de Moratín, La comedia nueva. El sí de las niñas, edition of John Dowling and René Andioc. Madrid: Castalia, 1968.Google Scholar
[ Regenta ] Leopoldo Alas «Clarín», La Regenta, edition of Gonzalo Sobejano. Madrid: Castalia, 1981/1982.Google Scholar
[ Bandidos ] Manuel Payno, Los bandidos de Río Frío, in Obras completas, edition of Manuel Sol. México: Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes, 2000.Google Scholar
[ Madrid ] Manuel Esgueva y Margarita Cantarero (eds.), El habla de la ciudad de Madrid: materiales para su estudio. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 1981.Google Scholar
[ México ] Juan M. Lope Blanch (coord.), El habla de la ciudad de México. Materiales para su estudio. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 1971.Google Scholar
[ DLNE ] Concepción Company Company, Documentos lingüísticos de la Nueva España. Altiplano central. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 1994.Google Scholar
References
Aaron, Jessi Elana, and Rena Torres Cacoullos. 2005. “Quantitative Measures of Subjectification: A Variationist Study of Spanish salir(se) .” Cognitive Linguistics 16(4): 607-633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckner, Clay, and Joan Bybee. 2009. “A Usage-based Account of Constituency and Reanalysis.” Language Learning 59: 27-46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L. 1945. “Purpose with Por and Para.” Modern Language Journal 28(1): 15-22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 2002. “Sequentiality as the Basis of Constituent Structure.” In The Evolution of Language out of Pre-language, ed. by T. Givón, and Bertram F. Malle, 109–134. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle 1998. Historical Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cappelli, Adriano. 1889/1990. Lexicon Abbreviaturarum: Dizionario di abbreviature latine ed italiane. Sexta edición. Trento: Ulrico Hoepli Editore.Google Scholar
Company Company, Concepción. 2002. “Grammaticalization and Category Weakness.” In New Reflections on Grammaticalization, ed. by Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald,201–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. “Introducción”, in Documentos lingüísticos de la Nueva España, Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 1-19.Google Scholar
Corominas, Joan. 1980-1991. Diccionario crítico-etimológico castellano e hispánico, con la colaboración de José Antonio Pascual. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Croft, William and D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2002-. Corpus del Español: 100 million words, 1200s-1900s. Available online at [URL].Google Scholar
García de Diego, Vicente. 1951. Gramática histórica española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Hanssen, Federico. 1945. Gramática histórica de la lengua castellana. Buenos Aires: El Ateneo.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. “The Gradual Coalescence into ‘Words’ in Grammaticalization.” In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, ed. by Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog, 342-355. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Benrd and Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites, Vol 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. “New Reflections on Grammaticalization and Lexicalization.” In New Reflections on Grammaticalization, ed. by Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald, 1-18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maldonado, Ricardo. 1999. A media voz: problemas conecptuales del clítico se. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Myhill, John. 1995. “Change and Continuity in the Functions of the American English Modals.” Linguistics 33(2): 157-211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana. 2001. “Variability, Frequency and Productivity in the Irrealis Domain of French.” In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, ed. by Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper, 405-428. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, Sally and Kaori Kabata. 2007. “Crosslinguistic Grammaticalization Patterns of the allative.” Linguistic Typology 11: 451-514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riiho, Timo. 1979. Por y para. Estudio sobre los orígenes y la evolución de una oposición prepositiva iberorrománica. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Solalinde, Antonio. 1930. Alfonso el Sabio: General Estoria, primera parte. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Históricos.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena. 2006. “Relative Frequency in the Grammaticization of Collocations: Nominal to Concessive a pesar de .” In Selected Proceedings of the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, ed. by Timothy A. Face and Carol E. Klee, 37-49. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena and Joseph Bauman. 2014 (in press). “Preposiciones III: Por, pora, para.” Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española, part III: Adverbios, preposiciones y conjunciones, Concepción Company Company (director). Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica y Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena and Scott A. Schwenter. 2005. “Towards an Operational Notion of Subjectification.” In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Prosodic Variation and Change, ed. by Rebecca T. Cover and Yuni Kim, 347-358. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin Herzog. 1968. “Empirical Foundations for a Theoryof Language Change. In Directions for Historical Linguistics, ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel, 95-195. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Wiesinger, Evelyn
2023. Chapter 12. On the role of verb-particle constructions in Old Spanish. In Constructions in Spanish [Constructional Approaches to Language, 34], ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Gradoville, Michael
2020. Chapter 9. On the origins of Portuguese para form variation. In Current Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 27], ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Lehmann, Christian
2019. Complex spatial prepositions from Latin to Castilian. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 54:1 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.