References
Adger David, and Daniel Harbour
2007 “Syntax and Syncretisms of the Person Case Constraint.” Syntax 10.1: 2–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark
1985 “The Mirror Principle and Morphosyntactic Explanation.” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–416.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina
2006 “On the Syntax of Pronominal Arguments.” Lingua 116: 2023–2067. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonet, Eulalia
1991Morphology after Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance. MIT, doctoral dissertation.
Calabrese, Andrea
1994 “Syncretism Phenomena in the Clitic systems of Italian and Sardinian Dialects and the Notion of Morphological Change.” In Proceedings of NELS 25.2, ed. by Jill Beckman, 151–174. Amherst (Mass.): GLSA.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
2008 “On Different Types of Clitic Clusters.” In The Bantu–Romance Connection, ed. by Cécile De Cat and Katherine Demuth, 41–82. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Michal Starke
1999 “The Typology of Structural Deficiency: A Case Study of the Three Classes of Pronouns.” In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Henk van Riemsdijk, 145–233. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Foulet, Lucien
1919Petite syntaxe de l’ancien francais. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz
1993 “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection.” In The View from Building 20, ed. by Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley Heidi, and Nancy Ritter
2002 “Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature-Geometric Analysis.” Language 78.3: 482–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, James
1994 “The Syntax-Phonology Mapping in Catalan and Spanish Clitics.” In MITWPL 21, Papers on Phonology and Morphology, ed. by Andrew Carnie and Heidi Harley, 321–353.Google Scholar
Heap, David
2002 “Split Subject Pronoun Paradigms: Feature Geometry and Underspecification.” In Current Issues in Romance Languages: Selected Papers from the 29th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL29), ed. by Teresa Satterfield, Christina M. Tortora, and Diana Cresti, 129–144. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logo
Jones, Michael Allan
1993Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1975French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000Parameters and Universals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2000A Comparative Syntax of the Dialects of Southern Italy: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele
2002 “External and Internal Causation in Morphological Change: Evidence from Italo-Romance Dialects.” In Morphology 2000, ed. by Sabrina Bendjaballah, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Oskar E. Pfeiffer, and Maria D. Voeikova, 227–240. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita, and Leonardo Savoia
2002 “Clitics: Lexicalization Patterns of the So-called 3rd Person Dative.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1: 117–155Google Scholar
Martin, Txuss
2009 “Deconstructing Dative Clitics.” In NYU Working Papers in Linguistics 2, ed. by Patricia Irwin and Violeta Vázquez Rojas Maldonado.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco
2002 “Some Clitic Combinations in the Syntax of Romance.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1: 201–224.Google Scholar
Pescarini, Diego
2010 “Elsewhere in Romance: Evidence from Clitic Clusters,” Linguistic Inquiry 41.3: 427–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Prosodic Restructuring and Morphological Opacity. The Evolution of Italo-Romance Clitic Clusters.” In Diachrony and Dialects: Grammatical Change in the Dialects of Italy, ed. by Adam Ledgeway, Paola Benincà, and Nigel Vincent, 155–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “The Emergence of Two Classes of Clitic Clusters in (Italo)Romance.” In Romance Linguistics 2012: Selected papers from the 42nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, ed. by Jason Smith and Tabea Ihsane, 171–183. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In press. “Clitic Clusters”. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (2nd ed.) ed. by Martin Everaert and Henk Van Riemsdijk London Wiley-Blackwell
Quilis, Antonio
1985Los pronombres le, la, lo y sus plurales en la lengua española hablada en Madrid. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas.Google Scholar
Rigau, Gemma
1982 “Inanimate Indirect Object in Catalan.” Linguistic Inquiry 13: 146–150.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard
1969Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, Vol II: Morfologia. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Ronjat Jules
1937Grammaire istorique des parlers provençaux modernes. Montpellier: Société des Langues Romanes.Google Scholar
Rezac, Milan
2010 “Ineffability through Modularity: Gaps in the French Clitic Cluster.” In Defective Paradigms: Missing Forms and What They Tell Us, ed. by Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, and Dunstan Brown, 151–180. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard
1970Le gascon. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 17 other publications

Pescarini, Diego
2021. Clitic climbing. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Morphophonological evidence against deficiency. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Clitic combinations. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Deriving enclisis in ‘V1’ clauses. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Historical overview. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. ‘V2’ and clitic placement. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Properties of Romance object clitics. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Introduction. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Theoretical preliminaries. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Clitics in embryo. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. The rise ofadverbalclitics. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Syntactic evidence against deficiency. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Conclusions. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Romance Object Clitics, DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Series preface. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. ix ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. List of abbreviations. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. xiii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Copyright Page. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.