This contribution focuses on the morphosyntax of third person dative clitics in Gallo-Romance. The first part addresses the morphology of clitic elements: in GalloRomance, third person datives can be expressed by an etymological form li(s) deriving from Lat illi(s) or by various kinds of non-etymological formatives, e.g. sg. lui, y, lou; pl. leur, yz, lous, lous-y, les-y, etc. I hypothesize that the above forms lexicalize different portions of the same functional hierarchy. The second part of the chapter focuses on the behaviour of third person dative clitics when combined with another third person clitic. In this context, (Gallo-)Romance varieties exhibit a number of irregularities and two possible orders: accusative > datives (as in both old and modern French), or dative > accusative (as in many French vernaculars). Moreover, in both medieval and present-day dialects, the accusative clitic is frequently dropped when clustered with a third person dative clitic. I wonder about a possible correlation between the morphology of the dative clitic and the make-up of clitic combinations.
Adger David, and Daniel Harbour. 2007. “Syntax and Syncretisms of the Person Case Constraint.” Syntax 10.1: 2–37.
Baker, Mark. 1985. “The Mirror Principle and Morphosyntactic Explanation.” Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–416.
Bianchi, Valentina. 2006. “On the Syntax of Pronominal Arguments.” Lingua 116: 2023–2067.
Bonet, Eulalia. 1991. Morphology after Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance. MIT, doctoral dissertation.
Calabrese, Andrea. 1994. “Syncretism Phenomena in the Clitic systems of Italian and Sardinian Dialects and the Notion of Morphological Change.” In Proceedings of NELS 25.2, ed. by Jill Beckman, 151–174. Amherst (Mass.): GLSA.
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2008. “On Different Types of Clitic Clusters.” In The Bantu–Romance Connection, ed. by Cécile De Cat and Katherine Demuth, 41–82. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Cardinaletti, Anna, and Michal Starke. 1999. “The Typology of Structural Deficiency: A Case Study of the Three Classes of Pronouns.” In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Henk van Riemsdijk, 145–233. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.
Foulet, Lucien. 1919. Petite syntaxe de l’ancien francais. Paris: Champion.
Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection.” In The View from Building 20, ed. by Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Harley Heidi, and Nancy Ritter. 2002. “Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature-Geometric Analysis.” Language 78.3: 482–526.
Harris, James1994. “The Syntax-Phonology Mapping in Catalan and Spanish Clitics.” In MITWPL 21, Papers on Phonology and Morphology, ed. by Andrew Carnie and Heidi Harley, 321–353.
Heap, David2002. “Split Subject Pronoun Paradigms: Feature Geometry and Underspecification.” In Current Issues in Romance Languages: Selected Papers from the 29th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL29), ed. by Teresa Satterfield, Christina M. Tortora, and Diana Cresti, 129–144. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Jones, Michael Allan. 1993. Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge.
Kayne, Richard. 1975. French Syntax: The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, Richard. 2000. Parameters and Universals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ledgeway, Adam. 2000. A Comparative Syntax of the Dialects of Southern Italy: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
Manzini, Maria Rita, and Leonardo Savoia. 2002. “Clitics: Lexicalization Patterns of the So-called 3rd Person Dative.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1: 117–155
Martin, Txuss. 2009. “Deconstructing Dative Clitics.” In NYU Working Papers in Linguistics 2, ed. by Patricia Irwin and Violeta Vázquez Rojas Maldonado.
Ordóñez, Francisco. 2002. “Some Clitic Combinations in the Syntax of Romance.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1: 201–224.
Pescarini, Diego. 2010. “Elsewhere in Romance: Evidence from Clitic Clusters,” Linguistic Inquiry 41.3: 427–444.
Pescarini, Diego. 2014. “Prosodic Restructuring and Morphological Opacity. The Evolution of Italo-Romance Clitic Clusters.” In Diachrony and Dialects: Grammatical Change in the Dialects of Italy, ed. by Adam Ledgeway, Paola Benincà, and Nigel Vincent, 155–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pescarini, Diego. 2015. “The Emergence of Two Classes of Clitic Clusters in (Italo)Romance.” In Romance Linguistics 2012: Selected papers from the 42nd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, ed. by Jason Smith and Tabea Ihsane, 171–183. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Pescarini, Diego. In press. “Clitic Clusters”. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (2nd ed.), ed. by Martin Everaert and Henk Van Riemsdijk. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Quilis, Antonio. 1985. Los pronombres le, la, lo y sus plurales en la lengua española hablada en Madrid. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas.
Rigau, Gemma. 1982. “Inanimate Indirect Object in Catalan.” Linguistic Inquiry 13: 146–150.
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1969. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, Vol II: Morfologia. Torino: Einaudi.
Ronjat Jules. 1937. Grammaire istorique des parlers provençaux modernes. Montpellier: Société des Langues Romanes.
Rezac, Milan. 2010. “Ineffability through Modularity: Gaps in the French Clitic Cluster.” In Defective Paradigms: Missing Forms and What They Tell Us, ed. by Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, and Dunstan Brown, 151–180. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1970. Le gascon. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Cited by (17)
Cited by 17 other publications
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Clitic climbing. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 235 ff.
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Morphophonological evidence against deficiency. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 135 ff.
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Clitic combinations. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 267 ff.
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Deriving enclisis in ‘V1’ clauses. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 213 ff.
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Historical overview. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 63 ff.
Pescarini, Diego
2021. ‘V2’ and clitic placement. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 183 ff.
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Properties of Romance object clitics. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 11 ff.
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Introduction. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Theoretical preliminaries. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 35 ff.
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Clitics in embryo. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 151 ff.
Pescarini, Diego
2021. The rise ofadverbalclitics. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 165 ff.
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Syntactic evidence against deficiency. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 107 ff.
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Conclusions. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. 295 ff.
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Romance Object Clitics,
[no author supplied]
2021. Series preface. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. ix ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. List of abbreviations. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. xiii ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Copyright Page. In Romance Object Clitics, ► pp. iv ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.
