Cover not available
Part of
Methods in Study Abroad Research: Past, present, and future
Edited by Carmen Pérez-Vidal and Cristina Sanz
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 4] 2023
► pp. 265–289

Chapter 11
Investigating pragmatic development in study abroad contexts

 | Universitat Jaume I
 | Universitat Jaume I
A study abroad (SA) period is considered an optimum environment for developing pragmatic competence because of the unparalleled target-language access it provides. Within this context, pragmatic development has received extensive attention over the last two decades, during which we have seen an evolution in research orientations. Existing studies employ quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches, building on each other to paint a picture of SA pragmatic development as an inherently dynamic process contingent on interdependence between a range of cognitive, affective, behavioural, and contextual factors. This chapter will reflect on existing research in this area, focusing on the approach, contributions, and limitations of a range of studies, as well as highlighting research desiderata and recommending research directions for future studies.
Keywords: pragmatic competence, pragmatic development, pragmatic awareness, pragmalinguistic, sociopragmatic, speech act, speech style, interaction, affordances, mixed methods
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Investigating pragmatic development in study abroad settings
    • Research approaches in SA pragmatics
    • Contributions to understanding SA pragmatic development
  • Limitations in existing SA pragmatics research
  • Principles and strategies for future SA pragmatics research
  • Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 3 February 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.4.11nig
References (51)
References
Alcón-Soler, E. (2012). Teachability and bilingualism effects on third language learners’ pragmatic knowledge. Intercultural Pragmatics, 9(4), 511–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Pragmatic learning and study abroad: Effects of instruction and length of stay. System, 48, 62–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Pragmatic development during study abroad: An analysis of Spanish teenagers’ request strategies in English emails. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 77–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alcón-Soler, E., & Safont, P. (2018). Editors’ introduction to mixed method approaches in investigating pragmatic learning. System, 75, 1–3. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronin, L. (2019). Dominant language constellation as a method of research. In E. Vetter & U. Jessner (Eds.), International research on multilingualism: Breaking with the monolingual perspective (pp. 13–26). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronin, L., & Ó Laoire, M. (2003). Exploring multilingualism in cultural contexts: Towards a notion of multilinguality. In C. Hoffmann & J. Ytsma (Eds.), Trilingualism in family, school, and community (pp. 11–29). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bastos, M. T. (2011). Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(3), 347–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 233–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Su, Y. (2021). The effect of learning environment on the selection of conventional expressions on an aural multiple-choice DCT. TESL-EJ, 25(1).Google Scholar
Barron, A. (2019). Editorial: Pragmatic development and stay abroad. Journal of Pragmatics, 146, 43–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). 15. Developing pragmatic competence in a study abroad context. In K. Schneider & E. Ifantidou (Eds.), Developmental and clinical pragmatics (pp. 429–474). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Block, D. (2009). Second language identities. Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. (2013). Identity and honorifics use in Korean study abroad. In C. Kinginger (Ed.), Social and cultural aspects of language learning in study abroad (pp. 269–298). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen, T., & Chen, J. (2021). Effects of study-abroad experiences on Chinese students’ L2 learning activities and study-abroad motivations. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 44(1), 21–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comstock, L., & Kagan, O. E. (2020). The heritage language learner in study abroad programs: Challenges to achieving intercultural competence. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 19(6), 428–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V., Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddle (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Sage.Google Scholar
Dabney, N. A. (2014). The influence of discourse particles on listeners’ perception of speakers in mandarin (Order No. 1568925). Available from Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); ProQuest One Academic. (1625976333).Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I. (2014). Making ethical decisions in an ethnographic study. TESOL Quarterly, 48(2), 413–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Ethics in applied linguistics research: Language researcher narratives. Routledge.Google Scholar
Diao, W. (2016). Peer socialization into gendered L2 Mandarin practices in a study abroad context: Talk in the dorm. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 599–620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Researching complex dynamic systems: ‘Retrodictive qualitative modelling’ in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47(1), 80–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duff, P. A., & Talmy, S. (2011). Language socialization approaches to second language acquisition: Social, cultural, and linguistic development in additional languages. In D. Atkinson (Ed.). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 95–116). Routledge.Google Scholar
Freed, B. F., Dewey, D. P., Segalowitz, N., & Halter, R. (2004). The language contact profile. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 349–356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukui, H., & Yashima, T. (2021). Exploring evolving motivation to learn two languages simultaneously in a study-abroad context. The Modern Language Journal, 105(1), 267–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hassall, T. (2015). Individual variation in L2 study-abroad outcomes: A case study from Indonesian pragmatics. Multilingua, 34(1), 33–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2020). Research methods for complexity theory in applied linguistics. Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, N. (2011). Learning L2 Japanese “Politeness” and “Impoliteness”: Young American men’s dilemmas during study abroad. Japanese Language and Literature, 45(1), 67–106. [URL]
Kang, O., Kermad, A., & Taguchi, N. (2021). The interplay of proficiency and study abroad experience on the prosody of L2 speech acts. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 7(3), 343–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinginger, C. (2008). Language learning in study abroad: Case studies of Americans in France. The Modern Language Journal, 92, i–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, C., Li, W., & Ren, W. (2020). Tracking the trajectories of international students’ pragmatic choices in studying abroad in China: A social network perspective. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(4), 398–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P. D. (2012). The idiodynamic method: A closer look at the dynamics of communication traits. Communication Research Reports, 29(4), 361–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magliacane, A., & Howard, M. (2019). The role of learner status in the acquisition of pragmatic markers during study abroad: The use of ‘like’ in L2 English. Journal of Pragmatics, 146, 72–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumura, S. (2003). Modelling the relationships among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 465–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. (2021). Documenting L2 input and interaction during study abroad: Approaches, instruments and challenges. Second Language Research, 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. (1999). Socialization. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1/2), 230–233. [URL]. DOI logo
Pérez-Vidal, C., & Shively, R. L. (2019). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad settings. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 355–371). Routledge.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Hernandez, A. (2018). A mixed-methods study of the impact of sociocultural adaptation on the development of pragmatic production. System, 75, 93–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sánchez-Hernández, A., & Alcón-Soler, E. (2019). Pragmatic gains in the study abroad context: Learners’ experiences and recognition of pragmatic routines. Journal of Pragmatics, 146, 54–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanz, C. (2014). Contributions of study abroad research to our understanding of SLA processes and outcomes. In C. Pérez-Vidal (Ed.). Language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (pp. 1–16). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shively, R. L. (2013). Learning to be funny in Spanish during study abroad: L2 humor development. The Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 930–946. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Naturalistic data in L2 pragmatics research: Challenges and opportunities. In A. Gudmestad & A. Edmonds (Eds), Critical reflections on data in second language acquisition (pp. 197–218). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Assessing L2 pragmatic competence. In J. C. Félix-Brasdefer & R. L. Shively (Eds.), New directions in second language pragmatics (pp. 131–141). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shively, R. L., & Cohen, A. D. (2008). Development of Spanish requests and apologies during study abroad. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 13(20), 57–118.Google Scholar
Sykes, J. (2021). Researching digital discourse in second language pragmatics. In J. C. Félix-Brasdefer & R. L. Shively (Eds.), New directions in second language pragmatics (pp. 197–207). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2018a). Description and explanation of pragmatic development: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research. System, 75, 23–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018b). Contexts and pragmatics learning: Problems and opportunities of the study abroad research. Language Teaching, 51(1), 124–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., & Li, S. (2017). Replication research in contextual and individual influences in pragmatic competence: Taguchi, Xiao & Li (2016) and Bardovi-Harlig & Bastos (2011). Language Teaching, 52(1), 128–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N., Xiao, F., & Li, S. (2016). Effects of intercultural competence and social contact on speech act production in a Chinese study abroad context. The Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 775–796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wamsley, J. C. (2019). Gendered usage of sentence-final particles in Mandarin Chinese. IULC Working Papers, 19(1).Google Scholar
Xiao, F. (2015). Proficiency, learning context and pragmatic development in L2 Chinese study abroad (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Carnegie Mellon University.