Cover not available
Part of
Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón and Julio Roca de Larios
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 5] 2023
► pp. 202–223

Chapter 10
Exploring the generation, development, and integration of argumentative goals in L1 and L2 composition processes

Methodological considerations

 | University of Murcia
The main purpose of this chapter is to critically examine a number of methodological issues related to the analysis of L1 and L2 writing processes from a genre-based perspective – a domain of inquiry that has remained largely underdeveloped in the L2 writing research agenda. I discuss the range of theoretical assumptions and empirical considerations that led me to become involved in the research, describe the most relevant methodological challenges faced when attempting to trace the generation, elaboration, and integration of writers’ argumentative goals across languages, and illustrate the decisions I made at these three stages. I finally evaluate the significance of the analytical categories and procedures previously discussed and suggest avenues for further research.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Overview of the research programme: Rationale, aims, and methods
  • Methodological decisions, challenges, and solutions
    • A taxonomy of argumentative moves
    • Coding the initial representation of the task
    • Identification of goal networks throughout the composition: Temporal and hierarchical dimensions
    • Integration of conflicting goals
  • Methodological conclusions and implications for future studies
  • References
Published online: 23 October 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.5.10roc
References (65)
References
Basturkmen, H., & von Randow, J. (2014). Guiding the reader (or not) to re-create coherence: Observations on postgraduate student writing in an academic argumentative writing task. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 16, 14– 22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bracewell, R. J., & Breuleux, A. (1994). Substance and romance in analyzing think-aloud protocols. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 55–88). Sage.Google Scholar
Breuer, E. O. (2019). Fluency in L1 and FL writing: An analysis of planning, essay writing and final revision. In E. Lindgren & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing. Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (pp. 190–211). Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H. (2011). Beyond writing as language learning or content learning. Constructing foreign language writing as meaning making. In R. M. Manchón (Ed), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 133–153). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Towards an agenda for researching L2 writing and language learning: The educational context of development. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning. Advancing research agendas (pp. 73–94). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18(1), 80–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chuang, P-L., & Yan, X. (2022). An investigation of the relationship between argument structure and essay quality in assessed writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coffin, C., & O’Halloran, K. A. (2009). Argumentation reconceived? Educational Review, 61(3), 301–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crammond, J. (1998). The uses and complexity of argument structures in expert and student persuasive writing. Written Communication, 15(2), 230–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A. (2009). The contribution of studies of foreign language writing to research, theories, and policies. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching and research (pp. 209–231). Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Goal theory and second language writing development, two ways. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 135–164). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). L2 writing and L2 learning: Transfer, self-regulation and identities. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning. Advancing research agendas (pp. 29–48). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferretti, R. P., & Graham, S. (2019). Argumentative writing: Theory, assessment, and instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32, 1345–1357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferretti, R. P., & Lewis, W. E. (2018). Knowledge of persuasion and writing goals predict the quality of children’s persuasive writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(6), 1411–1430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferretti, R. P., Lewis, W. E., & Andrews-Weckerly, S. (2009). Do goals affect the structure of students’ argumentative writing strategies? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 577–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flower, L., Schriver, K. A., Carey, L., Haas, C., & Hayes, J. R. (1992). Planning in writing: The cognition of a constructive process. In S. P. Witte, N. Nakadate, & D. Cherry (Eds.), A rhetoric of doing: Essays on written discourse in honor of James L. Kinneavy (pp. 181–243). Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Galbraith, D. (2009). Writing as a discovery. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1(1), 5–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, D., & Vedder, I. (2019). Methodological advances in investigating L2 writing processes. Challenges and perspectives. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 633–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentil, G. (2011). A biliteracy agenda for genre research. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(1), 6–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graham, S. (2018) A revised Writer(s)-Within-Community model of writing, Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modelling and remodelling writing. Written Communication, 29(3) 369–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1986). Writing research and the writer. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1106–1113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes J. R., & Nash, J. G. (1996). On the nature of planning in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 29–55). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hirvela, A. (2017). Argumentation & second language writing: Are we missing the boat? Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 69–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2011). Learning to write: Issues in theory, research and pedagogy. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 17–35). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 57–72). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Khuder, B., & Harwood, N. (2019). L2 writing task representation in test-like and non-test-like situations. Written Communication, 36(4): 578–632. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, H., & Rinnert, C. (2013). L1/L2/L3 writing development: Longitudinal case study of a Japanese multicompetent writer. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(1), 4–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López-Serrano, S., Roca de Larios, J., & Manchón, R. M. (2019). Language reflection fostered by individual L2 writing tasks: Developing a theoretically motivated and empirically based coding system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 503–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M. (2014). The internal dimension of tasks: The interaction between task factors and learner factors in bringing about learning through writing. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning. Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 27–52). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Leow, R. (2020). An ISLA perspective on L2 learning through writing. In R. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning. Advancing research agendas (pp. 335–356). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Roca de Larios, J. (2007). On the temporal nature of planning in L1 and L2 composing. Language Learning, 57, 549–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Writing to learn in FL contexts: Exploring learners’ perceptions of the language learning potential of L2 writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 181–207). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L. (2000). An approximation to the study of backtracking in L2 writing. Learning and Instruction, 10(1), 13–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mateos, M., Martín, E., Cuevas, I., Villalón, R., Martínez, I., & González-Lamas, J. (2018). Improving written argumentative synthesis by teaching the integration of conflicting information from multiple sources. Cognition & Instruction, 36(2), 119–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCabe, A. (2021). A functional linguistic perspective on developing language. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murphy, L., & Roca de Larios, J. (2010). Searching for words: One strategic use of the mother tongue by advanced Spanish EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(2), 61–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicolás-Conesa, F., Roca de Larios, J., & Coyle, Y. (2014). Development of EFL students’ mental models of writing and their effects on performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 24, 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). Using argumentation vee diagrams (AVDs) for promoting argument – counterargument integration in reflective writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 549–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2021). Critical integrative argumentation: Toward complexity in students’ thinking. Educational Psychologist, 56(1)1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, E. M., & Kardash, C. M. (2005). The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 157–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osborne, J. F., Bryan Henderson, J., MacPherson, A., Evan, S., Wild, A., & Shi-Ying, Y. (2016). The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 821–846. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parks, S. (2016). Workplace writing: From text to context. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 223–241). De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 38(3), 444–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raimes, A. (1987). Language proficiency, writing ability, and composing strategies: A study of ESL college student writers. Language Learning, 37, 439–468. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rinnert, C., Kobayashi, H., & Katayama, A. (2015). Argumentation text construction by Japanese as foreign language writers: A dynamic view of transfer. Modern Language Journal, 99, 213–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Murphy, L., & Manchón, R. M. (1999). The use of restructuring strategies in EFL writing: A study of Spanish learners of English as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 13–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Manchón, R. M., Murphy, L., & Marín, J. (2008). The foreign language writer’s strategic behavior in the allocation of time to writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 30–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2014). Exploring academic argumentation in course-related blogs through ENGAGEMENT. In G. Thompson & L. Alba-Juez (Eds.), Evaluation in Context (pp. 281–302). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanders, T., & Schilperoord, J. (2006). Text structure as a window on the cognition of writing; How text analysis provides insights in writing products and writing processes. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), The handbook of writing research (pp. 386–402). Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Stapleton, P., & Wu, A. (2015). Assessing the quality of arguments in students’ persuasive writing: A case study analyzing the relationship between surface structure and substance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 17, 12–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tardy, C. M. (2009). Building genre knowledge. Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Tardy, C., Sommer-Farias, B., & Gevers, J. (2020). Teaching and rehearsing genre knowledge: Towards an enhanced theoretical framework. Written Communication, 37(3), 287–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tillema, M. (2012). Writing in first and second language: Empirical studies on text quality and writing processes (Doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University, LOT Publications.
Tiryakioglu, G., Peters, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2019). The effect of L2 proficiency level on composing processes of EFL learners: Data from keystroke loggings, think alouds and questionnaires. In E. Lindgren & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing. Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (pp. 212–235). Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrance, M. (2016). Understanding planning in text production. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 72–87). Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Uysal, H. H. (2012). Argumentation across L1 and L2 writing: Exploring cultural influences and transfer issues. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9, 133–159.Google Scholar
Van Weijen, D., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2018). Source use and argumentation behavior in L1 and L2 writing: A within-writer comparison. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32(6), 1635–1655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Wijk, C. (1999). Conceptual processes in argumentation. A developmental perspective. In M. Torrance & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Knowing what to write. Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 31–49). Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Voss, J. F. (2005). Toulmin’s model and the solving of ill-structured problems. Argumentation, 19, 321–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, C. R., Britt, A. M., & Butler, J. A. (2009). Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation. Written Communication, 26(2), 183–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfersberger, M. A. (2007). Second language writing from sources: An ethnographic study of an argument essay task (Doctoral dissertation). University of Auckland.