Cover not available
Part of
Less Frequently Used Research Methodologies in Applied Linguistics
Edited by A. Mehdi Riazi
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 6] 2024
► pp. 9–29

Chapter 2
The Multiperspectival Approach to Applied Linguistic research

Exploring principles, questions, and orientations

| University of South Australia
| Auckland University of Technology

This chapter explores the distinctive features of the Multiperspectival Approach (MPA) to research: its theoretical and philosophical background, the questions it addresses, and the research orientations it enables. The chapter explains how MPA offers researchers a heuristic that addresses ontological and epistemological challenges to research that are central to the language-context relationship and consequential for any researcher who seeks to make claims about the meaning of language in the lives of others at particular sites. The chapter provides detailed background and guidance on what MPA involves and its value as a practical ontology that enables researchers to discover – rather than to search – the worlds of their participants, iteratively to learn through this process of discovery, developing warrants and finding themes to bridge these worlds through multiple, mutually-corroborating perspectives.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical foundations
  • 3.Methodological orientation
    • 3.1Principles and affordances
      • 3.1.1The researcher’s perspective
      • 3.1.2Participants’ perspective
      • 3.1.3Textual perspective
      • 3.1.4The social action perspective
      • 3.1.5The socio-historical perspective
    • 3.2Types of research questions addressed by MPA
    • 3.3Procedures of data collection and analysis
    • 3.4Ethical issues
  • 4.Critiques and responses
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 5 January 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.6.02cri
References
Bakhtin, M. M.
(1986) Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Texas University Press.Google Scholar
Blumer, H.
(1966) Sociological implications of the thought of G. H. Mead. American Journal of Sociology, 71, 535–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1969) Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.
(1990) The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Language and symbolic power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brown, G., & Yule, G.
(1983) Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Candlin, C. N.
(1997) General editor’s preface. In B. L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, & B. Nordberg (Eds.), The construction of professional discourse (pp. viii–xiv). Longman.Google Scholar
(2002) Introduction. In C. N. Candlin (Ed.), Research and practice in professional discourse (pp. 1–36). City University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
Candlin, C. N., & Crichton, J.
(2011a) Emergent themes and research challenges: Reconceptualising LSP. In M. Peterson & J. Engberg (Eds.), Current trends in LSP research (pp. 277–316). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2011b) Introduction. In C. N. Candlin & J. Crichton (Eds.), Discourses of deficit (pp. 1–22). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013a) From ontology to methodology: Exploring the discursive landscape of trust. In C. N. Candlin & J. Crichton (Eds.), Discourses of trust (pp. 1–18). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) (2011c) Discourses of deficit. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(Eds.) (2013b) Discourses of trust. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Candlin, C. N., Crichton, J., & Firkins, A.
(2016) Crucial sites and research orientations: Exploring the communication of risk. In J. Crichton, C. N. Candlin, & A. Firkins (Eds.), Communicating risk (pp. 1–16). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Candlin, C. N., Crichton, J., & Moore, S.
(2017) Exploring discourse in context and in action. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, B., & Sealey, A.
(2000) Language, structure and agency: What can realist social theory offer to sociolinguistics? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(1), 3–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cicourel, A. V.
(1982) Interviews, surveys, and the problem of ecological validity. American-Sociologist, 17(1), 11–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) The interpenetration of communicative contexts: Examples from medical encounters. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 291–310). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2007) A personal, retrospective view of ecological validity. Text & Talk, 27(5/6), 735–759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crichton, J.
(2004) Issues of interdiscursivity in the commercialisation of professional practice. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Macquarie University.
(2010) The discourse of commercialization: A multiperspectived analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018a) Framing a ‘community of consumption’: Field theory, multiperspectival discourse analysis and the commercialization of teaching. In J. Albright, D. Hartman, & J. Widin (Eds.), Bourdieu’s field theory and the social sciences (pp. 117–131). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018b) Transdisciplinary applied linguistics: Issues of perspectivity and transcendence. International Association of Applied Linguistics Review, 31(1), 143–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crichton, J., Candlin, C. N., & Firkins, A.
(Eds.) (2016) Communicating risk. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crichton, J., & Koch, T.
(2007) Living with dementia: Curating self-identity. Dementia, 6(3), 365–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dallmayr, F. R.
(1991) Life-world, modernity and critique: Paths between Heidegger and the Frankfurt School. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C.
(1992) Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 1–42). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N.
(1992) Discourse and social change. Polity Press.Google Scholar
(1997) Discourse across disciplines: Discourse analysis in researching social change. AILA Review, 12, 3–17.Google Scholar
Foucault, M.
(1979) Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Penguin.Google Scholar
(1989) The archeology of knowledge. Routledge.Google Scholar
(Ed.) (1980) Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H.
(1967) Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Geertz, C.
(1973) The interpretation of culture. Basic Books.Google Scholar
(1983) Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Giddens, A.
(1984) The constitution of society. Polity Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Modernity and self-identity. Polity Press.Google Scholar
(1994) Introduction. In A. Giddens, D. Held, D. Hubert, D. Seymour, & J. Thompson (Eds.), The Polity reader in social theory (pp. 1–8). Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
(1974) Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
(1981) Forms of talk. Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1983) The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.
(1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) Contextualisation and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 229–252). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 215–228). Routledge.Google Scholar
Habermas, J.
(1984) The theory of communicative actio, Volume one: Reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press.Google Scholar
(1987) The theory of communicative action. Volume two: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Hocking, D.
(2011) The discursive construction of creativity as work in a tertiary art and design environment. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 7(2), 235–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Communicating creativity: The discursive facilitation of creative activity in arts. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, C.
(Ed.) (2009) Routledge handbook for multimodal analysis. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T.
(2006) Reading images. The grammar of visual design. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, J.
(1986) Word, dialogue and novel. In T. Moi (Ed.), The Kristeva Reader (pp. 34–61). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lambek, M.
(2010) Introduction. In M. Lambek (Ed.), Ordinary ethics: Anthropology, language, and action. (pp. 1–36). Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Layder, D.
(1993) New strategies in social research. Polity Press.Google Scholar
(1998) Sociological practice: Linking theory and social research. Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moustakas, C. E.
(1990) Heuristic research. Sage.Google Scholar
Nagel, T.
(1986) The view from nowhere. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Riazi, A. M., & Candlin, C. N.
(2014) Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2), 135–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C., & Sarangi, S.
(1999) Hybridity in gatekeeping discourse: Issues of practical relevance for the researcher. In S. Sarangi & C. Roberts (Eds.), Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings (pp. 473–504). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Theme-oriented analysis of medical encounters. Medical Education, 39, 632–640. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1992) Lectures on conversation, Volumes I and II. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S.
(2007) Editorial. The anatomy of interpretation: Coming to terms with the analyst’s paradox in professional discourse studies. Text & Talk, 27(5/6), 567–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Experts on experts: Sustaining ‘communities of interest’ in professional discourse studies. In M. Gotti, S. Maci, & M. Sala (Eds.), Insights into medical communication (pp. 25–50). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S., & Candlin, C. N.
(2001) ‘Motivational relevancies’: Some methodological reflections on social theoretical and sociolinguistic practice. In N. Coupland, S. Sarangi, & C. N. Candlin (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and social theory (pp. 350–387). Longman.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J.
(2011) Bismarck: A life. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sultan, N.
(2018) Heuristic inquiry. Sage.Google Scholar
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C.
(2003) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. Sage.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T.
(2008) Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar