Article published In:
Revue Romane
Vol. 57:1 (2022) ► pp.86115
References (56)
References
Ackerman, F., J. P. Blevins & R. Malouf. (2009): Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms, in: Blevins, J. P. & J. Blevins (eds.): Analogy in grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 54–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alcover, A. & F. de B. Moll. (1929–1933): La flexió verbal en els dialectes catalans. Anuari de l’Oficina romànica de lingüística i literatura 21, pp. 79–184, 31, pp. 73–168, 41, pp. 9–104, 51, pp. 9–72.Google Scholar
Alibèrt, L. (1976): Gramatica occitana segon los parlars lengadocians. CEO, Montpellier.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. (1994): Morphology by itself. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Baerman, M. (2007): Syncretism. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 5, pp. 539–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baerman, M., D. Brown & G. Corbett. (2005): The Syntax-Morphology Interface. A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, J. (2016): Word and paradigm morphology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, O. (2014): La structure fine des paradigmes de flexion. HDR dissertation, Université Paris Diderot, Paris.Google Scholar
Bonami, O. & G. Boyé (2002): Suppletion and stem dependency in inflectional morphology, in: Van Eynde, F., L. Hellan & D. Beerman (eds.): Proceedings of the HPSG ’01 Conference. SCLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 51–70.Google Scholar
(2003): Supplétion et classes flexionnelles dans la conjugaison du français. Langages, 1521, pp. 102–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brun-Trigaud, G. (1990): Le Croissant: le concept et le mot. Doctoral dissertation, Université Lyon III, Lyon.Google Scholar
Camproux, C. (1962): Essai de géographie linguistique du Gévaudan. Presses Universitaires de France, Montpellier.Google Scholar
Carrera, A. (2007): Gramatica aranesa. Pagès, Lhèida.Google Scholar
Casagrande, S. (2011): L’unité et la diversité des systèmes verbaux en langue d’oc et dans les aires limitrophes. Essai de reconstruction. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Nice, Nice.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. (2007): Canonical Typology, Suppletion, and Possible Words. Language, 831, pp. 8–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enger, H.-O. (2014): Reinforcement in inflection classes: Two cues may be better than one. Word Structure, 7, 2, pp. 153–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esher, L. (2015): Morphomes and predictability in the history of Romance perfects. Diachronica, 32, 4, pp. 494–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016): Morphomic distribution of augments in varieties of Occitan. Revue Romane, 51, 2, pp. 271–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020): Syncretism and metamorphomes in northern Occitan (Lemosin) varieties, in: Wolfe, S. & M. Maiden (eds.): Variation and change in Gallo-Romance grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 364–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guérin, M. (2019): Grammaire du parler marchois de Dompierre-les-Églises. L’Harmattan, Paris.Google Scholar
Guerrero, A. (2011): Verbal inflection in central Catalan: A realisational analysis. Lingue e linguaggio, 101, pp. 265–282.Google Scholar
(2014): Analyse thématique de la flexion en catalan central standard. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse.Google Scholar
Hinzelin, M.-O. (2011a): Syncretism and suppletion in Gallo-Romance verb paradigms, in: Maiden, M., J. C. Smith, M. Goldbach & M.-O. Hinzelin (eds.): Morphological Autonomy. Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 287–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011b): La morphologie verbale du nord-occitan dans l’ensemble gallo-roman, in: Rieger, A. & D. Sumien (eds.): L’Occitanie invitée de l’Euregio. Liège 1981 – Aix-la-Chapelle 2008. Bilan et perspectives. Actes du Neuvième Congrès International de l’AIEO, Aix-la-Chapelle, 24–31 août 2008. Vol. II. Shaker, Aachen, pp. 719–732.Google Scholar
(2012): Verb morphology gone astray: Syncretism patterns in Gallo-Romance, in: Gaglia, S. & M.-O. Hinzelin (eds.): Inflection and Word Formation in Romance Languages. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 55–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Juge, M. (2013): Analogy as a source of suppletion, in: Kikusawa, R. & L. A. Reid (eds.): Historical Linguistics 2011. Selected papers from the 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka, 25–30 July 2011. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 175–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koschwitz, E. (1973 [1894]): Grammaire historique de la langue des Félibres. Slatkine Reprints, Genève.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1990): How to do things with junk. Journal of Linguistics, 26, 1, pp. 76–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maiden, M. (2000): Di un cambiamento intramorfologico: Origini del tipo dissi dicesti ecc., nell’italoromanzo. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 85, 2, pp. 137–171.Google Scholar
(2001): A strange affinity: perfecto y tiempos afines. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 581, pp. 441–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004): Verb augments and meaninglessness in Romance morphology. Studi di grammatica italiana, 221, pp. 1–61.Google Scholar
(2005): Morphological autonomy and diachrony. Yearbook of Morphology, 2004, pp. 137–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009a): From pure phonology to pure morphology. The reshaping of the Romance verb. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, 381, pp. 45–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b): Un capitolo di morfologia storica del romeno: preterito i tempi affini. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, 1251, pp. 273–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012): A paradox? The morphological history of the Romance present subjunctive, in: Gaglia, S. & M.-O. Hinzelin (eds.): Inflection and Word Formation in Romance Languages. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 27–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013): The Latin ‘third stem’ and its Romance descendants. Diachronica, 301, pp. 492–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016a): Morphomes, in: Ledgeway, A. & M. Maiden (eds.): The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 708–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016b): Some lessons from history. Morphomes in diachrony, in: Luís, A. & R. Bermúdez-Otero (eds.): The Morphome Debate. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 33–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018): The Romance Verb. Morphomic structures and diachrony. Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, G. & B. Moulin. (2007): Grammaire provençale et cartes linguistiques, deuxième édition revue et corrigée. Comitat Sestian d’Estudis Occitans, Aix-en-Provence.Google Scholar
Meul, C. (2010): The intra-paradigmatic distribution of the infix -I/ESC- from Latin to Modern Romance: morphomic patterning and beyond. Morphology, 201, pp. 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). The Romance reflexes of the Latin infixes -I/ESC- and -IDI-: restructuring and remodeling processes. Buske, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Milizia, P. (2016): Sincretismo compensativo ed esponenza semiseparata in alcuni paradigmi verbali del dominio italo-romanzo centromeridionale. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 101, 1, pp. 88–119.Google Scholar
Moll, F. de B. (2006): Gramàtica històrica catalana. València: Universitat de València.Google Scholar
O’Neill, P. (2014): The morphome in constructive and abstractive models of morphology. Morphology, 241, pp. 25–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quint, N. (ms.): Azérables: morphologie verbale. Unpublished fieldwork notes.
Ronjat, J. (1937): Grammaire istorique des parlers provençaux modernes, vol. III. Société des Langues Romanes, Montpellier.Google Scholar
Round, E. R. (2015): Rhizomorphomes, meromorphomes, and metamorphomes, in: Baerman, M., D. Brown & G. Corbett (eds.): Understanding and measuring morphological complexity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 29–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Savinian [= Lhermitte, J.] (1978 [1882]): Grammaire provençale: précis historique de la langue d’oc. Marcel Petit, Raphèle-lès-Arles.Google Scholar
Sibille, J. (2015): Description de l’occitan parlé à Sénaillac-Lauzès (Lot) et dans les communes voisines. Lambert Lucas, Limoges.Google Scholar
Smith, J. C. (2013): The morphome as a gradient phenomenon: Evidence from Romance, in: Cruschina, S., M. Maiden & J. C. Smith (eds.): The Boundaries of Pure Morphology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 247–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, G. (2016): Inflectional paradigms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, G. & R. Finkel. (2013): Morphological typology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, M. (1993): Changing inflection: verbs in North West Catalan, in: Mackenzie, D. & I. Michael (eds.): Hispanic Linguistic Studies in honour of F. W. Hodcraft. Dolphin, Llangrannog, pp. 171–206.Google Scholar
(2011): The Evolution of a Morphome in Catalan Verb Inflection, in: Maiden, M., J. C. Smith, M. Goldbach & M.-O. Hinzelin (eds.): Morphological Autonomy. Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 183–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, M., A. Yates & N. Dols. (1999): Catalan: a comprehensive grammar. Routledge, London. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

ESHER, LOUISE
2024. The intricate inflectional relationships underpinning morphological analogy. Journal of Linguistics 60:2  pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Herce, Borja & Bogdan Pricop
2024. VeLeRo: an inflected verbal lexicon of standard Romanian and a quantitative analysis of morphological predictability. Language Resources and Evaluation DOI logo
Kasstan, Jonathan R.
2022. A variationist analysis of the subjunctive mood in a sociolinguistic corpus of spoken Francoprovençal. Linx :84 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.