Article published In:
Register Studies
Vol. 2:1 (2020) ► pp.102130


Aull, L. L., & Lancaster, Z.
(2014) Linguistic markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: A corpus-based comparison. Written Communication, 31(2), 151–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
(2019) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E., & Quirk, R.
(1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Collins, P.
(2009a) Modals and quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Modals and quasi-modals in world Englishes. World Englishes, 28(3), 281–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Depraetere, I., & Verhulst, A.
(2008) Source of modality: A reassessment. English Language & Linguistics, 12(1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, S., & Nesi, H.
(2013) A classification of genre families in university student writing. Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, B., & Biber, D.
(2012) Current conceptions of stance. In K. Hyland & C. S. Guinda (Eds.), Stance and voice in written academic genres (pp. 15–33). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1994) An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hood, S.
(2004) Managing attitude in undergraduate academic writing: A focus on the introductions to research reports. In L. J. Ravelli & R. A. Ellis (Eds.), Analysing academic writing: Contextualised frameworks, (pp. 24–44). London: Continnum.Google Scholar
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K.
(2002) The Cambridge grammar of English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2005) Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Tse, P.
(2005) Evaluative that constructions: Signalling stance in research abstracts. Functions of Language, 12(1), 39–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N.
(2009) Change in contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R.
(1984) Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (Ed.), Language studies: Children’s writing: Reader (p. 984). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, G.
(1989) The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S.
(2012) Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R.
(1979) Modality and the English modals (1st ed.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rayson, P.
(2016) Log-likelihood and effect size calculator. Retrieved from: [URL]> (12 March 2018)
Scott, M.
(1996) WordSmith Tools. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scimago Journal rank
(2016) Retrieved from: [URL]> (15 October 2017).
The ICE Project
(2009) The design of the ICE corpora. Retrieved from: [URL]> (19 March 2019).
Verhulst, A., Depraetere, I., & Heyvaert, L.
(2013) Source and strength of modality: An empirical study of root should, ought to and be supposed to in present-day British English. Journal of Pragmatics, 551, 210–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, J-C.
(2001) Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics, 331, 1505–1528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar