Cover not available
Article published In:
Register Studies
Vol. 4:1 (2022) ► pp.30–54

TV shows, authenticity, and language learning

A corpus-based case study

ORCID logo | Qatar University
One of the many resources teachers seek for authentic materials, particularly for spoken English, is TV. However, the concept of authenticity is relative, and it is sometimes hard to determine how authentic materials are. The present study uses a corpus-based analysis to assess to what extent a soap opera, compared to a sitcom, represent natural conversation on a salient set of linguistic features associated with the situational characteristics of conversation. Results showed that the soap opera seems to be closer to natural conversation, and hence more authentic, in the use of features associated with two situational characteristics out of three, namely real time production and interactiveness, and expressing feelings and stance. Results could help inform the practitioners’ decisions when looking for authentic spoken materials.
Keywords: TV shows, natural conversation, authenticity, situational characteristics, language learning
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Using authentic video materials in esl instruction
    • 1.2Authenticity and TV shows language
    • 1.3Register variation, situational characteristics of conversation, and TV registers
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Corpora
    • 2.2Linguistic features
    • 2.3Analysis
  • 3.Results and discussion
  • 4.Summary and implications
  • References
Published online: 9 June 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.19016.als
References (52)
References
Al-Surmi, M. (2012). Authenticity and TV shows: A multidimensional analysis Perspective, TESOL Quarterly, 46 (4), pp 671–694. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). TV Shows, word coverage and incidental vocabulary learning: Implications for speakers of Arabic learning English. In K. M. Bailey and R. M. Damerow (Eds.), The teaching and learning of English in the Arabic-speaking world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Altman, R. (1989). The video connection: Integrating video into language teaching. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bacon, S. (1989). Listening for real in the foreign-language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 22 1, 543–551. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baltova, I. (1994). The impact of video on the comprehension skills of core French students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50 1, 507–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Vellenga, H. E. (2012). The effect of instruction on conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. System, 40 1, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barlow, M. (2000). MonoConc Pro, version 2.0.Google Scholar
Bednarek, M. (2010). The language of fictional television. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2018). Language and television series: A linguistic approach to TV dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T., & Veirano Pinto, M. (2017). American television and off-screen registers: A corpus-based comparison. Corpora, 12 (1). 85–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2001). Multi-dimensional analysis and the study of register variation. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 3–12). London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2009). Register, genre, and style. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Buendgens-Kosten, J. (2013). Authenticity in CALL: three domains of ‘realness’. ReCALL 25 (2), 272–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, U. K. (1994). The effect of audio, a single picture, multiple pictures, or video on second-language listening comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne, Illinois.
Curtis, A. (2015). Learning English through the language of the Pokémon: “Just watchin’ TV, ma”. In D. Nunan & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Language learning beyond the classroom (pp. 138–48). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gebhard, J. (1996). Teaching English as a foreign or second language: A self-development and methodology guide. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gil, G. (2016). Third places and the interactive construction of interculturality in the English as foreign/additional language classroom. Acta Scientiarum. Language and Culture, 38 (4), 337–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40 (2), 97–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grant, L., & Starks, D. (2001). Screening appropriate materials closings from textbooks and television soap operas. IRAL, 39 1, 39–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hanf, A. (2015). Resourcing authentic language in television series. In D. Nunan & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Language learning beyond the classroom (pp. 129–37). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herron, C., & Seay, I. (1991). The effect of authentic oral texts on student listening comprehension in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 24 1, 487–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herron, C., Morris, M., Secules, T., & Curtis, L. (1994). A comparison study of the effects of video-based versus text-based instruction in the foreign language classroom. The French Review, 68 (5), 775–795.Google Scholar
Kozloff, S. (2000). Overhearing Film Dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1999). The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In H. Hasselgård, & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in honour of Stig Johansson (pp. 107–118). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Lin, P. M. S., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2015). Internet television for L2 vocabulary learning. In D. Nunan & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Language learning beyond the classroom (pp. 149–158). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maria, P. (2011). Exploring the representation of orality: The use of vocatives in two Spanish-speaking films, Machuca and Volver. Sociolinguistic Studies, 5 (1), 103–126.Google Scholar
Martinez-Gibson, E. (1998). A study on cultural awareness through commercials and writing. Foreign Language Annals, 31 (1), 115–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1995). Spoken grammar: What is it and how can we teach it? ELT Journal, 49 (3), 207–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morley, J. (1990). Trends and developments in listening comprehension: Theory and practice. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University round table on language and linguistics (pp. 317–337). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Napier, S. J. (2001). Anime: From Akira to Princess Mononoke: Experiencing contemporary Japanese animation. New York: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pardo-Ballester, C. (2012). CALL evaluation: Students’ perception and use of LoMasTv. CALICO Journal, 29 (3), 532–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peacock, M. (1997). The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal 51 (2). 144–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poupore, G. (2014). The influence of content on adult L2 learners’ task motivation: An interest theory perspective. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17 (2), 69–90.Google Scholar
Quaglio, P. (2004). The language of NBC’s Friends: A comparison with face-to-face conversation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University, Arizona.
(2009). Television dialogue: The sitcom Friends vs. natural conversation. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quaglio, P., & Biber, D. (2006). The grammar of conversation. In B. Aarts & A. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp. 692–723). Oxford: Blackwells. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, M. P. H. (2013). English language learning through viewing television: An investigation of comprehension, incidental vocabulary acquisition, lexical coverage, attitudes, and captions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Rogers, C., & Medley, F. (1988). Language with a purpose: Using authentic materials in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 21 1, 467–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85 (1), 39–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schenke, A. (1996). Feminist theory and the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 30 (1), 155–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Secules, T., Herron, C., & Tomasello, M. (1992). The effect of video context on foreign language learning. Modern Language Journal, 76 (4), 480–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sherman, J. (2003). Using authentic video in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A., & Rawley, L. (1997). Using TV commercials to teach listening and critical thinking. The Journal of the Imagination in Language Learning and Teaching, 4 1. Retrieved from [URL]
Washburn, G. (2001). Using situation comedies for pragmatic language teaching and learning. TESOL Journal, 10 1, 21–26.Google Scholar
Webb, S. (2015). Extensive viewing: Language learning through watching television. In D. Nunan & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Language learning beyond the classroom (pp. 159–68). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009). The vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59 (2), 335–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weyers, J. (1999). The effect of authentic video on communicative competence. Modern Language Journal, 83 (3), 339–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Berber Sardinha, Tony
2024. AI-generated vs human-authored texts: A multidimensional comparison. Applied Corpus Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 100083 ff. DOI logo
Dixon, Daniel H.
2024. Measuring the linguistic similarity of discourse from open-world role-playing games to the real world through an additive multidimensional analysis. Register Studies DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.